1
The Lounge / Re: Obama (please read this thread before assumptions of this thread)
« on: September 17, 2008, 05:00:12 AM »
very little. i was sad enough to read the whole thing 
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
The Lounge / Pollution and Energy (Split from Obama)
« on: September 06, 2008, 12:40:22 PM »
the cause of chernobyl was poorly trained staff operating a complex power system and forgetting every rule in the book during a routine test.
3
The Lounge / Pollution and Energy (Split from Obama)
« on: September 06, 2008, 08:05:36 AM »
seems me and meyer have similar views on where the immediate future lies.
has this topic been officially hijacked? lol. i dont think anyone is interested in that videos message...
has this topic been officially hijacked? lol. i dont think anyone is interested in that videos message...
4
The Lounge / Pollution and Energy (Split from Obama)
« on: September 05, 2008, 02:16:24 PM »
hmmm...im torn between the two.
Obama would be perfect, but the one thing that makes me dislike his policies is the "pull out of Iraq" stuff. The US (and us in GB) should never have gone there. but now we have a responsibility to clean up the mess we caused and ensure Iraq is stable.
However, i could never like McCain or his decisions either, bar Iraq. The republicans seem to stand for the exact opposite to what i believe is right. luckily, as i live in good 'ol Britain, i dont have to worry about that. i just have to worry about Brown or Thatcher Mkll...
Obama would be perfect, but the one thing that makes me dislike his policies is the "pull out of Iraq" stuff. The US (and us in GB) should never have gone there. but now we have a responsibility to clean up the mess we caused and ensure Iraq is stable.
However, i could never like McCain or his decisions either, bar Iraq. The republicans seem to stand for the exact opposite to what i believe is right. luckily, as i live in good 'ol Britain, i dont have to worry about that. i just have to worry about Brown or Thatcher Mkll...
5
Welcome to the Boards / Re: HAHAHAH!!!! hi.
« on: November 18, 2007, 06:35:35 AM »
muhahaha...phase 2 of the take-over-thrawns-revenge-forum plan has been implemented 
time to be random time....wait for it...TURKEYS!!!
time to be random time....wait for it...TURKEYS!!!
6
Forum Games / Re: What are you listening to right now?
« on: October 25, 2007, 05:43:16 PM »
lol
weird al - trigger happy
weird al - trigger happy
7
The Lounge / Re: fall of Great Britain
« on: October 23, 2007, 12:38:57 PM »
i know....and (most) of the time, they dont do anything...but its because it is REALLY difficult when you are doing something...reading thousands of pages of a new law to make sure oyu have no objections
8
The Lounge / Re: fall of Great Britain
« on: October 23, 2007, 12:17:32 PM »
a lot...lol. 644 in house of commons.
10
The Lounge / Re: The Best
« on: October 23, 2007, 10:50:22 AM »
i think it was instrumental in defending britain during world war 2. cheap, expendable yet highly effective vs the better german planes.
11
The Lounge / Re: author's
« on: October 13, 2007, 01:29:57 PM »
no-one said McNab...lol. hes my fav writer. second is Nathan Elliot...randomly found on of his books and have been searching for more ever since...
12
The Lounge / Re: fall of Great Britain
« on: October 13, 2007, 01:27:41 PM »
...or me im probably off into a political career, lol. world would never be the same... 
VOTE S-T-N
im probably off into a political career, lol. world would never be the same... VOTE S-T-N
13
Welcome to the Boards / Re: hello
« on: October 12, 2007, 01:28:39 PM »this is unbelieveble they kicked me outa ueaw just becouse i post only 2 words and bumbing into old forums (god) it where forums from a week ago i dont cal that old so i dont know wye they banned me but i say it aint fair1) that topic was 2 months old
2) it wasnt that you had just posted 2 words, 99% of your posts were 1 word or a smilie.
3) you were given 3 official warnings from proto and an un-official 1 frm me
4) the ban is only tempory...on 13th u will be allowed back on.
14
The Lounge / Re: Religon
« on: October 11, 2007, 02:36:24 PM »
from the age of 3 i was being brainwashed with it. but i managed to find science, which i founda much better answer than "because god did it".
just to let you know, the main reason these smart, intellegent people choose religion is for comfort, in one form or another. my mum is religios because she NEEDS to know that the people who made her life a misery will have justice dealt to them.
just to let you know, the main reason these smart, intellegent people choose religion is for comfort, in one form or another. my mum is religios because she NEEDS to know that the people who made her life a misery will have justice dealt to them.
15
The Lounge / Re: Religon
« on: October 11, 2007, 02:10:59 PM »
originally, religionwas useful...but in modern day society, it serves no purpose...
what especially annoys me is that parents can send their children 2 RC schools and that, so they get brainwashed with religion....i was sent to one ofthese schoools, and was oneof the few that saw reality.
what especially annoys me is that parents can send their children 2 RC schools and that, so they get brainwashed with religion....i was sent to one ofthese schoools, and was oneof the few that saw reality.
16
The Lounge / Re: fall of Great Britain
« on: October 11, 2007, 01:45:32 PM »
that goes double so for him...if he ever becomes PM then britain will fall into depression, with mass unemployment.
17
The Lounge / Re: Religon
« on: October 11, 2007, 01:43:22 PM »
personally, im not religious...but if i had to choose, it would be "other"...the true form of christianity which is based on the gospel of thomas, which is closest to gospel of jesus. it states "The Kingdom of God is within you, not in buildings of wood and stone. Split a piece of wood and I am there. Lift the stone and you will find me." so naturally, was declared heracy by the church.
i actually knew about this before i saw or heard of Stigmata, which talks about it. see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_St._Thomas#Notes for the Gospel of Thomas
i actually knew about this before i saw or heard of Stigmata, which talks about it. see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_St._Thomas#Notes for the Gospel of Thomas
18
The Lounge / Re: fall of Great Britain
« on: October 11, 2007, 01:33:21 PM »
leader of english conservative party...he thinks he fits in with the average person, but hes really a posh snob like rest of the conservatives.
19
The Lounge / Re: fall of Great Britain
« on: October 07, 2007, 01:09:47 PM »
the loans crisis...the us is in x trillion dollars debt, and that equats to x million per person to pay, so they are recalling all the loans from abroad. thats what caused the Northern Rock crisis.
20
The Lounge / Re: The Best
« on: September 29, 2007, 07:02:12 PM »Then why did the germans try to destroy BEF from air? it would have been very stupid if the British had had manny planes over Dunkirk. And the RAF wasn't building enough planes. the got many of those from USA. and had the germans keep destroying the fields like they were the RAF would have been forced to retreat to Scotland. And that info was given to me by american made documents were had many british experts in them. I don't knoiw what they have taught you but you should check all angels and not just simply assuming that everything what is told to you in school history lessonsis true. And remeber most importantly: History is ALWAYS winners history.they tried to destroy the BEF from the air because of some British commanders notgetting their act together. the RAF gave very little cover while they were in Belgium, but only because of the leadership. by dunkirk, however, the RAF were providing Air cover.
their is obviously a difference in opinion between our two sources because although i acknowledge that the Americans made some of the parts the RAF needed, a lot more was made in Britain. America mainly provided the money needed.
also, my sources say that on average it took just 3 days for a runway to be completely fixed and fully operational after a heavy Luftwaffe bombing raid, hardly enough to force us to Scotland.
my sources are a mixture of War Veteran testimonies from German and British soldiers, as well as History books and good old wikipedia
i do try and explore all angles, and will only argue a point after that process has finished. if isee something to persuade me otherwise, i will change sides. oh, and thats my quote...thief