Those working on this mod do so in their own free time and for no pay.
Show your support for them by enabling ads on this site!

Author Topic: Pollution and Energy (Split from Obama)  (Read 17048 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

September 04, 2008, 08:32:02 PM

Offline siegfried1

  • Rear Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 148
  • Approval: +2/-8
    • View Profile
Pollution and Energy (Split from Obama)
« on: September 04, 2008, 08:32:02 PM »
Pulling out of Iraq before it completely stabilizes is a bad idea. Country would have a civil war between Sunnis, Shi'ites, and Kurds. They would probably split Iraq into different regions for each group, disrupting the flow of oil from Iraq and negatively impacting the global economy.
First of all, who cares if they have a civil war, i mean, we do nothing about it in Africa, so what's another one (note, this is sarcasm).  Second, there is enough oil for us and the west, and that's all that matters.
But courage which goes against military expediency is stupidity, or, if it is insisted upon by a commander, irresponsibility.
Don't fight a battle if you don't gain anything by winning.
In a man-to-man fight, the winner is he who has one more round in his magazine.
Sweat saves blood.
(Erwin Rommel, the most awesome person to ever live)

September 04, 2008, 08:42:00 PMReply #1

Offline Dr. Knickers

  • Mod Team Member
  • Vice Admiral
  • ****
  • Posts: 338
  • Approval: +21/-2
    • View Profile
Pollution and Energy (Split from Obama)
« Reply #1 on: September 04, 2008, 08:42:00 PM »
How would you like a price hike on oil? How would the rest of the world?

September 04, 2008, 09:36:59 PMReply #2

Offline siegfried1

  • Rear Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 148
  • Approval: +2/-8
    • View Profile
Pollution and Energy (Split from Obama)
« Reply #2 on: September 04, 2008, 09:36:59 PM »
Well, there's a lot more oil than just that in the middle east.  There's probably trillions in Canada.
But courage which goes against military expediency is stupidity, or, if it is insisted upon by a commander, irresponsibility.
Don't fight a battle if you don't gain anything by winning.
In a man-to-man fight, the winner is he who has one more round in his magazine.
Sweat saves blood.
(Erwin Rommel, the most awesome person to ever live)

September 04, 2008, 10:10:00 PMReply #3

Offline Scarecrow63

  • Former Mod Team Member
  • Moff
  • *
  • Posts: 1,891
  • Approval: +37/-30
  • In internet speak, vowels are the first casualty
    • View Profile
Pollution and Energy (Split from Obama)
« Reply #3 on: September 04, 2008, 10:10:00 PM »
Good idea, tomorrow at eight we'll shut down all pipelines from the middle east and all go pump oil outta canada!  Oh wait, that won't work. 

Isn't in the bath, he prefers the shower

September 05, 2008, 12:17:02 AMReply #4

Offline Delta 07

  • Rear Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 154
  • Approval: +6/-20
    • View Profile
Pollution and Energy (Split from Obama)
« Reply #4 on: September 05, 2008, 12:17:02 AM »
iraq having a civil war would suck. i dont care about the iraqis, just the oil prices. and we dont stop the civil wars in africa because its not worth sending a squad of marines. half of africa's civil wars start because some guy stole a pig or goat from a person in another country

September 05, 2008, 12:43:16 AMReply #5

Offline Meyer

  • Grand Moff
  • **********
  • Posts: 4,152
  • Approval: +69/-2
  • Do-ro'ik vong pratte!
    • View Profile
Pollution and Energy (Split from Obama)
« Reply #5 on: September 05, 2008, 12:43:16 AM »
iraq having a civil war would suck. i dont care about the iraqis, just the oil prices. and we dont stop the civil wars in africa because its not worth sending a squad of marines. half of africa's civil wars start because some guy stole a pig or goat from a person in another country

so USA didn't go to Iraq to bring it's people democrazy and freedom?
I reject your canon and substitute my own!


September 05, 2008, 10:26:27 AMReply #6

Offline Delta 07

  • Rear Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 154
  • Approval: +6/-20
    • View Profile
Pollution and Energy (Split from Obama)
« Reply #6 on: September 05, 2008, 10:26:27 AM »
In my opinion, it was oil first, and while were there lets set up a democracy. another world super-power like china would just take the oil and let the iraqi people fend for themselves. ( I have nothing against china, just saying what I think they would do)

September 05, 2008, 02:16:24 PMReply #7

Offline s-t-n

  • Brevet Admiral
  • ****
  • Posts: 103
  • Approval: +2/-0
  • NEVER take anything i say seriously
    • View Profile
    • FW Mod
Pollution and Energy (Split from Obama)
« Reply #7 on: September 05, 2008, 02:16:24 PM »
hmmm...im torn between the two.

Obama would be perfect, but the one thing that makes me dislike his policies is the "pull out of Iraq" stuff. The US (and us in GB) should never have gone there. but now we have a responsibility to clean up the mess we caused and ensure Iraq is stable.

However, i could never like McCain or his decisions either, bar Iraq. The republicans seem to stand for the exact opposite to what i believe is right. luckily, as i live in good 'ol Britain, i dont have to worry about that. i just have to worry about Brown or Thatcher Mkll...
92% of teens have moved on to (c)rap. if you are one of the 8% who listen to real music, copy and paste this into your sig

September 05, 2008, 02:54:13 PMReply #8

Offline Slornie

  • Mod Team Member
  • Moff
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,759
  • Approval: +54/-13
  • Every Silver Lining has a Cloud
    • View Profile
Pollution and Energy (Split from Obama)
« Reply #8 on: September 05, 2008, 02:54:13 PM »
Now ive looked into things, i think i'd actually like Ralph Nader to win.  Unfortunately, there's no chance of that happening =[
Quote from: RonMaverick291 (Gametrailers)
why do u hate america? if it were not for us u guys would be lost. i mean we invented the tv, we invented the internet, cars and we even went to the planet moon. we won all the wars and we always help the little countries who cant fight and we give food to poor people.

September 05, 2008, 03:08:28 PMReply #9

Offline vadereclipse

  • Grand Admiral
  • ********
  • Posts: 939
  • Approval: +28/-27
    • View Profile
Pollution and Energy (Split from Obama)
« Reply #9 on: September 05, 2008, 03:08:28 PM »
with nader, the only bad thing is, he's technically the reason bush served 2 terms, or even 1, for that matter.
in both 2000 and 2004 he took votes from mainly democrats, meaning republicans had an advantage. however, nader seems like a civilised american politician.

September 05, 2008, 05:00:49 PMReply #10

Offline siegfried1

  • Rear Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 148
  • Approval: +2/-8
    • View Profile
Pollution and Energy (Split from Obama)
« Reply #10 on: September 05, 2008, 05:00:49 PM »
Good idea, tomorrow at eight we'll shut down all pipelines from the middle east and all go pump oil outta canada!  Oh wait, that won't work. 


Okay smart ass, i just meant there's more than just what's in the Middle East.  It was just an alternative idea.
But courage which goes against military expediency is stupidity, or, if it is insisted upon by a commander, irresponsibility.
Don't fight a battle if you don't gain anything by winning.
In a man-to-man fight, the winner is he who has one more round in his magazine.
Sweat saves blood.
(Erwin Rommel, the most awesome person to ever live)

September 05, 2008, 05:05:02 PMReply #11

Offline Scarecrow63

  • Former Mod Team Member
  • Moff
  • *
  • Posts: 1,891
  • Approval: +37/-30
  • In internet speak, vowels are the first casualty
    • View Profile
Pollution and Energy (Split from Obama)
« Reply #11 on: September 05, 2008, 05:05:02 PM »
The problem is, most of it is in the Middle East, at least whats usable right now.  So like it or not, the world relies on the middle east for oil right now.
Isn't in the bath, he prefers the shower

September 05, 2008, 05:37:18 PMReply #12

Offline vadereclipse

  • Grand Admiral
  • ********
  • Posts: 939
  • Approval: +28/-27
    • View Profile
Pollution and Energy (Split from Obama)
« Reply #12 on: September 05, 2008, 05:37:18 PM »
also, you don't pump oil as soon as a rig or pump is assembled. it takes a long time for any substantial supply of oil is pumped. While i believe iraq should be gradually pulled out from, i am not against the ides of temporary bases with garrisons of troops, similar to in Cyprus.

September 05, 2008, 06:57:42 PMReply #13

Offline Delta 07

  • Rear Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 154
  • Approval: +6/-20
    • View Profile
Pollution and Energy (Split from Obama)
« Reply #13 on: September 05, 2008, 06:57:42 PM »
who cares about oil, ethanol is the best. which just happens to be supplied by Brazi or most of it.

September 05, 2008, 07:07:30 PMReply #14

Offline Slornie

  • Mod Team Member
  • Moff
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,759
  • Approval: +54/-13
  • Every Silver Lining has a Cloud
    • View Profile
Pollution and Energy (Split from Obama)
« Reply #14 on: September 05, 2008, 07:07:30 PM »
Except, in many cases, bioethanol creates just as much CO2 as oil (through deforestation, etc).  Also, the land used to grow the ethanol crops cannot then be used for growing food crops, pushing up food prices.
Quote from: RonMaverick291 (Gametrailers)
why do u hate america? if it were not for us u guys would be lost. i mean we invented the tv, we invented the internet, cars and we even went to the planet moon. we won all the wars and we always help the little countries who cant fight and we give food to poor people.

September 05, 2008, 07:13:08 PMReply #15

Offline vadereclipse

  • Grand Admiral
  • ********
  • Posts: 939
  • Approval: +28/-27
    • View Profile
Pollution and Energy (Split from Obama)
« Reply #15 on: September 05, 2008, 07:13:08 PM »
bioethanol in the USA is made through corn. this has led to a shortage in food supplies of both corn, and livestock, and as it has taken pressure off oil, has been kept in place, and heavily subsidised, wasting taxpayer's money. biofuels in the USA are a failure.

September 06, 2008, 12:15:04 AMReply #16

Offline Scarecrow63

  • Former Mod Team Member
  • Moff
  • *
  • Posts: 1,891
  • Approval: +37/-30
  • In internet speak, vowels are the first casualty
    • View Profile
Pollution and Energy (Split from Obama)
« Reply #16 on: September 06, 2008, 12:15:04 AM »
In my opinion, ethanol is the bigget scam just about ever. Its marketed as a way to help the environment, but thats just a big lie.  The process ends up producing more co2 than normal gas, costs more than normal gas, requires more expensive engines to run on, drives up food prices worldwide, and devastates rain forests.
Isn't in the bath, he prefers the shower

September 06, 2008, 01:08:43 AMReply #17

Offline Delta 07

  • Rear Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 154
  • Approval: +6/-20
    • View Profile
Pollution and Energy (Split from Obama)
« Reply #17 on: September 06, 2008, 01:08:43 AM »
Hey, its an alternative fuel. though expensive and costly to your wallet and the enviorment. and scarecrow, it produces a little less co2 than normal gas. and all the global warming crap is BS anyways so who cares

September 06, 2008, 03:01:39 AMReply #18

Offline Meyer

  • Grand Moff
  • **********
  • Posts: 4,152
  • Approval: +69/-2
  • Do-ro'ik vong pratte!
    • View Profile
Pollution and Energy (Split from Obama)
« Reply #18 on: September 06, 2008, 03:01:39 AM »
and ethanol is made by slave labor. wasn't that abolished few hundred years ago? but this is going way out of topic right now.
I reject your canon and substitute my own!


September 06, 2008, 04:42:57 AMReply #19

Offline vadereclipse

  • Grand Admiral
  • ********
  • Posts: 939
  • Approval: +28/-27
    • View Profile
Pollution and Energy (Split from Obama)
« Reply #19 on: September 06, 2008, 04:42:57 AM »
In my opinion, ethanol is the bigget scam just about ever. Its marketed as a way to help the environment, but thats just a big lie.  The process ends up producing more co2 than normal gas, costs more than normal gas, requires more expensive engines to run on, drives up food prices worldwide, and devastates rain forests.
i totally agree. i don't see anything good about biofuels.
sure it's renewable, but it's not very environmental.
plus, it has caused huge inflation of meat prices in the USA, as all the crops are being reserved for bioethanol.
this causes inflation, and causes people to not be able to pay, and may eventually cause farmers to lose their livelihood.

 

Those working on this mod do so in their own free time and for no pay.
Show your support for them by enabling ads on this site!