Those working on this mod do so in their own free time and for no pay.
Show your support for them by enabling ads on this site!

Author Topic: The Last Jedi (SPOILERS SPOILERS LOTS OF SPOILERS YOUR FAULT SPOILERS)  (Read 29934 times)

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

December 20, 2017, 05:04:21 AM

Offline Pali

  • Tester
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 790
  • Approval: +39/-2
    • View Profile
So, since we should have somewhere that we can discuss the newest entry to the saga openly, I figured I'd get the ball rolling.  I seem to be in somewhat of a minority opinion here in that I very much enjoyed the new movie, and I figured I'd break down why to get things started.  So, in my opinion based on a single viewing (future viewings may alter these opinions)...

The great:
-The entire scene with Snoke, Rey, Ren, and the Red Guards from start to finish
-Luke projecting himself to the salt planet
-Yoda
-The hyperspace ram - one of the most beautiful shots in all of Star Wars
-Rey and Ren being connected and their conversations
-Poe prank calling Hux was fucking AWESOME
-The acting of all the main characters - everyone gave their A-game here and it showed
-FUCKING SHIELDS ON SHIPS EXIST AND WE SEE THEM!

The good:
-Finn's suicide charge as he finally finds something he can willingly devote himself to (alongside the utter failure of the falling-apart speeders vs top-line military vehicles) - though I'm torn on whether or not I think he should've been allowed to die trying, as that would've been a very powerful moment but would also have left the character feeling somewhat short-changed in my mind; if he'd died there I know I'd have come out having wanted more of him and disappointed (not sad, disappointed) that there wouldn't be, and I think that'd have been the wrong last feeling to leave me with regarding him
-Poe's arc as he learns that sometimes discretion is the better part of valor
-Rose was adorable
-Chewie and the porgies (or whatever they're called) was hilarious and adorable
-Luke's arc as Rey and Yoda remind him that utter failure isn't always the end
-Leia showing she's got some Force tricks up her sleeves too
-Rey coming to define her own place in things rather than still asking for someone else to tell her what it is, and accepting the mantle of a new sort of post-Jedi force user (though this could've been a bit better handled, I still really liked how she was done here, particularly the apparent fact that her parents were nobodies; I hated all theories that she was the child of someone super important, and I really hope they don't backtrack on this one in Ep. IX because not everything has to be about the fucking Skywalkers)
-Hux starting to draw his blaster before Ren wakes up and clearly resisting Ren assuming the Supreme Leader mantle - lots of ground to grow there in Ep. IX
-I really liked that Del Toro's character was NOT a scoundrel-with-a-heart-of-gold; he was just a scoundrel, and had the movie tried to redeem him in the short time we had with him it would've felt forced.  Han coming back after everything in ANH worked - Del Toro's character turning good would not have

The meh, could be better:
-The Rose-Finn romance didn't feel earned, but then again, not everyone expresses affection the same way, and Rose definitely geeked out enough on meeting Finn and showed enough social anxiety issues that I can somewhat buy a fangirl thinking she's in love with a personal hero she finally spends some time with
-Snoke could've used a fair bit more characterization before being killed off, but I suspect he was always intended as a red herring of sorts, and that the whole point of the character was to lead us to expect a Vader-turning-on-the-Emperor moment of redemption for Kylo Ren; instead we got a dark side apprentice legitimately killing his master to seize the mantle rather than to change sides - and in truth, it's not like the original trilogy gave us any deep character work for the Emperor either
-The casino planet storyline I actually didn't mind all that much, but it didn't mesh with the rest of the film well, and what it achieved I think could've been achieved through other means.  It got Rose and Finn on the Mega SD so they could participate in the climax, it gave them an adventure together so the Rose-Finn pairing didn't feel entirely fake, and it built on the kind of nuanced look at the galactic wars introduced during the prequels and Clone Wars series: that there are people who benefit greatly from this struggle without sharing any of the risks, and that want the wars to never end because they keep lining the pockets of profiteers, and that the wars don't just happen purely because ideologically-opposed beings can't find a middle-ground.  Instead, they often happen in no small part because many have a vested interest in keeping the fighting happening.  This is good stuff, but I don't think it was handled as well as it could have been by any stretch, and this was the only part of the movie that I felt dragged.
-Much as I liked the hyperspace ram, it should've been Ackbar as the admiral in charge of the suicide run, not some lady I'd never seen before
-BB-8 felt somewhat underutilized to me - I enjoyed every moment with him still, but he didn't quite live up to the charm he had in TFA
-I understand the point of the end scene with the kid on the planet symbolizing a new Rose, a new hope, a new rebellion/resistance to the harshness of the galaxy, but it still felt somewhat tacked on to me

The bad:
-The bomber run against the dreadnought - despite what many will think, yes, a ship under powered flight above a planet CAN just drop bombs that way assuming that down for the bomber points close-to-directly at the planet (once detached from the ship the bombs will still be accelerated "down" by gravity while the ship's own acceleration will keep it on a "straight" path, leaving the bombs to "fall" relative to the ship), but it felt wrong nonetheless and I'd have greatly preferred it to feel more like a battle in space without gravity playing any apparent role
-Leia surviving being blown out into space.  Yes, this contradicts one of my goods above, but I think showing Leia still had significant Force powers could have been achieved without squandering this PERFECT way to kill the character - Kylo deciding not to kill her and then her dying anyway because of an attack he's a part of would have been a wonderful thing for him, and the audience, to go through.  There's a bit of hindsight at play here, as I suspect she was intended to die in Ep. IX and reality intervened, but damn it that would've been a great send-off
-edit: One more bad: Phasma.  There was some utility in terms of Finn's arc to have him face off against her, but it fell flat due to her lack of any characterization beyond "female loyal stormtrooper with mirrored armor".  The fight gave Finn an okay moment of personal victory against a symbol of the group that brainwashed and abused him, but it felt by-the-numbers; Finn's suicide charge did a far better job of making me feel that he'd truly devoted himself to defeating the First Order, not just escaping it, without once again failing to properly utilize a potentially badass minor villain who already was misused in the previous film.  If they bother to bring her back in Ep IX, they really need to do a far better job of it or Phasma will never feel like anything beyond Star Wars trying to monetize Brienne of Tarth's awesomeness without having earned the right to do so.

The ugly:
.........................................yeah, I got nothing for this category

The movie is by no means perfect, but I had a great time overall, with the casino planet being the only significant part that felt dragged-out and truly unnecessary to me.  Its apparent purposes were to connect Finn and Rose, which it didn't really succeed at, to introduce a reason for Finn to question the rationale behind the Resistance before he truly decides to devote himself to it anyways (which again, it didn't quite succeed at), and to get Finn and Rose onto the Mega SD, which could've been done a bajillion other ways without half the hoops to jump through.  But Del Toro was fun to see, and I really liked that he wasn't a "hidden good guy" character but instead was quite sincerely a mercenary for hire, and I liked Rose and Finn so I didn't mind joining them for a quick if somewhat unnecessary and absurd adventure.
« Last Edit: December 20, 2017, 06:11:43 AM by Pali »

December 20, 2017, 01:33:14 PMReply #1

Offline turtle225

  • Brevet Admiral
  • ****
  • Posts: 101
  • Approval: +3/-0
  • Location: Shell
    • View Profile
Re: The Last Jedi (SPOILERS SPOILERS LOTS OF SPOILERS YOUR FAULT SPOILERS)
« Reply #1 on: December 20, 2017, 01:33:14 PM »
Welp, here's my take.

The good:
-The Snoke/Rey/Ren/Guards scene yes, I agree. But it leaves us with some problems I'll get to. It was also too blatantly a rip on episode 6.
-The acting.
-Shields on ships but only sometimes? Poe has no problems blowing up a dozen guns at the start with only his lasers.
-Chewie and the porgies was the only humor I liked.
-R2D2 and Luke's scene.
-Rey's parents are nobody, it isn't cliché and I like it. I'm actually surprised by how many people are upset about this.
-Despite how pointless Finn is in this movie, he is the only of the main three that I liked and he is the only one who developed well.
-Shooting Luke with the At-At's instead of being cliché and fighting him one on one.
-Luke's line about how Rey expects him to defeat the First Order by himself with a laser sword.

The bad:
-Poe prank calling Hux. It you want to be positive it makes Poe look clever. If you want to be negative it makes a joke of Hux, you know, a major villain we are supposed to be afraid of.
-Poe can fight a dreadnought by himself. A dreadnought only has 10 lasers apparently and no shields. It gets destroyed by one bomber.
-In 25 years, the resistance/rebellion/republic (who even knows) has replaced their Y-Wings and B-Wings with hot air balloons and somehow expect to ever destroy anything.
-Leia tells Poe not to attack the Dreadnought and fall back. Poe disagrees and the entire fighter/bomber fleet follows him? Shouldn't they be listening to Leia or is everybody as trigger happy/insubordinate as Poe?
-The fighter fleet is too cock-eyed and smug prior to the engagement on what is an insubordinate suicide run. Compare to episode 4 which is much more serious.
-The final bomber somehow survives for 100 years when the rest of the fleet was destroyed so easily. Rose's sister thing was far too drawn out.
-Hyperspace tracking is new technology? Since when? The books established that you can make educated guesses on where people are going when they hyperspace out based on their vector and astronomy.
-Finn knows where the tracker is because he used to mop the decks? When exactly because I thought he was mopping Star Killer base. I guess janitors get around to all of the new tech. Snoke doesn't even apparently know about the tracker.
-The rebel flagship powers rear shields but leaves the bridge exposed when they are under fighter attack? Is Ackbar that stupid? No.
-The First Order blows up the abandoned rebel ships instead of taking the free hardware. Only explanation is that they are afraid of traps but everybody in this movie is so dumb that they would never do that.
-Kylo/Rey's force connection, Luke's force projection, Yoda showing up. This is a nitpick from the books, these things should not be possible.
-What happened to the Knights of Ren? Why was Kylo obsessed with Vader in 7? Johnson doesn't know or seem to care.
-How were they planning on destroying the battering ram/cannon with speeders that apparently don't even have guns?
-Negating Finn's heroic sacrifice. Either let him do it or don't have the scene at all. They wanted to have their cake and eat it too and it made the whole thing feel extremely contrived. It also weakens Poe's development because he orders the team to pull back because it won't work, yet Finn makes it through anyway. Then Finn and Rose kiss in front of all of the At-At's and Finn drags her back without getting captured?
-The giant door is the only way into the resistance bunker... right? Oh wait there are entrances from the trenches that the soldiers are fighting from.
-Why is their a land assault on the bunker? "No prisoners, kill them all." They opened the movie by bombarding the rebel base from orbit, why not do that here? What is even the point of the soldiers in the trenches? They are literally just fodder with no chance to doing damage to anything.
-Rose's character. Sorry, I didn't like her and she felt very forced. She also falls in love with Finn in like eight hours.
-Snoke is dead. As much as I liked the scene in the moment it really leaves 9 in a bad place. Kylo the brat is now the supreme ruler and main villain? Really lame. He gets tricked by Kylo even though he KNEW that Kylo was conflicted. I would have liked an epic battle with Kylo/Rey vs Snoke but rip that dream. Snoke had all this build up to be super strong and yet he dies like a ***** before he does anything or we learn anything about him. It is a waste on par with Darth Maul.
-NO WORLD BUILDING: I'm really upset about this. At the end of 7, the first order takes a huge blow with the loss of Star Killer base and the Republic loses their capital, but in 8 apparently the resistance is on the brink of defeat and the First Order controls the galaxy?  This was a major problem in 7 and it persists. What is the First Order, where did it come from? Who is Snoke? Why is the Republic/Rebellion/Resistance/Whatever still fighting for control of the galaxy? What the bloody heck happened in the last 25 years?
-Leia: "We have all that we need here" Because apparently the resistance didn't need those 1000s of people that probably died over the course of the movie. A dozen people in the Falcon will suffice.
-No autopilot function? Holdo and others have to stay behind and sacrifice themselves because apparently they forgot how autopilot works. I do like your idea of Ackbar doing the suicide run though, that would have been great.
-Hyperspace ram destroys the entire First Order Fleet. No.
-Turbolaser shots picking off small transport ships with perfect accuracy.
-Rey gets basically no training from Luke, yet she has no problem fighting the red guards (who are definitely trained) or lifting a bunch of rocks. She is as much of a Mary Sue in this movie as the last.
-BB8 the rolling deus ex machina can do anything. Heroes are in a bind? No problem BB8 will show up and save the day. Leia was right "we have all we need here." As long as they have BB8 how can they lose?
-Weak Villains: Snoke is built up but then wasted, Phasma is totally wasted. Kylo is a whiney brat. Hux is made out as a joke. The Red Guards are more interesting than these guys.
-Themes beaten over the head. Minor nitpick I guess, but it is nice when they are more subtle.

The ugly:
-Idiot Plot (A plot that occurs because character(s) are idiots): The First Order can't catch the rebel ships... really? They can't microjump forward (Poe just did this earlier)? Or how about you send a bunch of fighters because you know, Kylo singlehandedly wiped out the hangers, bridge, and the entire rebel fighter fleet. Sure you might lose a few fighters but since when has the empire cared?
-The resistance ships have no fuel... so what was their plan? They didn't even have enough fuel to reach the planet they were going for regardless of the First Order showing up.
-Idiot Plot: Holdo won't tell Poe the plan. WHY? Because we need the movie to last an hour longer. As such we get both Cantobight and a mutiny. These things would not have happened if Holdo just tells Poe the plan, but the writers needed Finn and Poe to have something to do because literally nothing is happening in the plot they wrote.
-Cantobight and the master code breaker. This is a major wasted subplot and waste of time. I don't like the idea of there being a "master code breaker" to begin with. The entire time on Cantobight was painful and they beat us over the head with their theme here. In the end the plan fails anyway soo great work team?
-Plot Hole: hyperspace=teleportation as far as time is concerned. This was a problem in 7 and R1 also. The new writers don't seem to understand that hyperspace travel takes TIME. The entire chase scene is about 6 to 8 hours yet Finn has time to fly to Cantobight, spend a bunch of time there and fly back? Rey can show up at the end from Luke's oasis?
-Plot Hole: Rey is on the island communicating with Kylo while the rebel fleet is being chased. The chase is 6 to 8 hours but we see multiple day/night cycles for Rey on the island. The only explanation is that Luke's planet has a stupid fast day/night cycle but that is convoluted.
-Leia: Cringe worthy. She should have died on the bridge. Also Poe lets her back into the ship and somehow they don't all get sucked out into vacuum? There was no airlock there.
-LUKE: Oh God Luke. Ruined. Leaves a map behind in 7 (main plot driver of 7) but then when Rey finds him he just tells her to shove off? If he went to the planet to die then why the heck did he leave behind a map? I couldn't buy into his desire to end the Jedi or his overall withdrawal because it is so fundamentally against his character. Even Mark Hamill has openly declared that he disagreed with Johnson's take on the character. This isn't the Luke we knew. They wanted him to be just like Yoda was in episode 5. His behavior and character are so wrong.
-Luke considers killing Kylo because he is showing dark side tendencies. NO.
-Luke's death. We all knew he would die, but I at least wanted it to be awesome. Instead he dies because he was old and used too much energy or something. I would have liked it a lot better if he died in the At-At's blasts AND THEN he tricked Kylo by lingering as a force ghost to buy the others more time.

I probably forgot some stuff and all of that is disorganized so sorry. But really I think a lot of the problems arise because the writers wanted to have and eat their cake.
-Kill Leia? No she's fine.
-Kill Finn? No we gotta save him.
-Luke is a hero? Yes but he isn't there and dies anyway.
-Luke is grumpy old man and won't train Rey? But Rey is apparently way stronger anyway.
-Kylo is conflicted? Yea but he's still apparently going to evil just cause. We still don't even know why he is evil. Did Han refuse to give him cookies when he was kid?

It seems like the writers weren't sure how to make the main characters relevant.
-The main plot is that the resistance is fleeing from the First Order. We use that as our baseline, and are basically stuck with this 8 hour window.
-Poe needs something to do... how about a mutiny? That's dramatic.
-Finn needs something to do... and a love triangle apparently, how about a convoluted subplot?
Rather than build a main plot that gives each hero something to do it was more like our heroes were stuck in a plot with nothing to do and they had to shoehorn in stuff to keep them relevant.

And finally a bunch of problems arise because of the disconnect between Abrams and Johnson. I didn't like 7 either but I thought if 8 built upon it then it would make it better. But clearly Johnson and Abrams are not on the same page. The New Jedi Order series is written by over 12 different people and yet all of those books connect and flow better than just two movies with different directors. I don't like Abrams either but I honestly think it would have been better with him at the helm. At least he would have built off of his own foundation. Probably.

December 20, 2017, 06:33:14 PMReply #2

Offline Pali

  • Tester
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 790
  • Approval: +39/-2
    • View Profile
Re: The Last Jedi (SPOILERS SPOILERS LOTS OF SPOILERS YOUR FAULT SPOILERS)
« Reply #2 on: December 20, 2017, 06:33:14 PM »
Not going to go through point by point, but I do have a few comments regarding your criticisms.

First, I was never on the "Rey is a Mary Sue" bandwagon - if she is, then so was Luke in ANH, so was Anakin in the prequels, and so were the Solo children and dozens of other Force-sensitives in the EU.  People being innately gifted because of Force powers, or manifesting powers without consciously trying to or without any training, is not something new in Star Wars stories.

Second, some technical bits: small ships being able to penetrate shields and hit the hull also has plenty of precedents - that's how X-wings could shoot the Death Star, how Han killed Zsinj.  This ability isn't consistently presented, but it's not new.  Bombers following a cocky fighter pilot against orders also isn't new - that's how Corran Horn and Warden Squadron bagged a Lancer in the first Rogue Squadron book.  The orbital bombardments the movie opened with were carried out by the dreadnought Poe helped destroy, which is why they couldn't be done at the end.  The hyperspace ram didn't destroy the whole fleet, just the SSD and ships behind it that were hit by debris moving at close to light speed; ships remained to launch the land attack.  Autopilot never works during dramatic moments in any franchise.  Small or not, transports moving on a near-straight line course are easy targets.  Hyperspace tracking doesn't appear anywhere in the EU that I can recall without having a tracking device on the ship being tracked - projecting courses and making educated guesses, yes, but the tracking here was a lot more precise and done without a bug on the tracked ship; regardless, it was very much new as far as the movies go, as getting into hyperspace in the movies had always been an escape.

Third, a lot of your criticisms can be equally applied to the original trilogy.  Where were the Empire's origins explained, or the Rebellion's, or the Emperor's past (or NAME even)?  New Force abilities are shown in every movie, why are the ones here a problem?  The Death Star can't just microjump around Yavin for a clear shot?  Travel times don't exist there either - Tatooine to Alderaan seems to take about ten minutes, Hoth to Bespin without a hyperdrive is fast enough that Fett has to tell the Empire to get there first rather than catch the Falcon in an open sublight intersystem transit that should take decades.  How long was Luke on Dagobah, and how does the time he spent training with Yoda match up to the seeming no time at all it takes the Falcon to make it to Cloud City?

Liking or disliking character arcs or portrayals is largely subjective, so I don't see much point in going into depth on them - you hated Luke's characterization and arc, I enjoyed both greatly.  You saw the fight as a rip-off of 6, I saw it as an intentional parallel and reversal of 6.  Holdo not explaining things to Poe made sense to me: you don't spread need-to-know information to people who don't need-to-know, especially when you're being tracked by means you don't understand (which could include a traitor or security leak of some sort), and there isn't a military on the planet (edit: meaning real life Earth) that allows a subordinate to demand explanations of orders the way Poe did.
« Last Edit: December 21, 2017, 04:38:27 AM by Pali »

December 21, 2017, 06:07:41 AMReply #3

Offline Grand Admiral Rufaan Tigellinus

  • Rear Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 160
  • Approval: +8/-0
  • One of the 13
    • View Profile
Re: The Last Jedi (SPOILERS SPOILERS LOTS OF SPOILERS YOUR FAULT SPOILERS)
« Reply #3 on: December 21, 2017, 06:07:41 AM »
Since I did not think that TLJ was a completely worthless film, I wouldn't bash it as heavily as Turtle225 did, even though he did make a few points with which I agree. There were indeed a lot of strengths in it as a film, the problem is, in my opinion, that TLJ does not work as a Star Wars film specifically. For me, there are a lot of flaws and obvious mistakes in it which I can more or less ignore. Such as Luke disappearing along with his prosthetic hand, which should have remained on the ground where he vanished (this actually hints on another thing to which I'll come back later), Leia entering the "Raddus" where there is no airlock, the Resistance fleet not having enough fuel to get to Crait, regardless of the First Order's pursuit (two points which Turtle225 has pointed out in his post), ships apparently going at exactly the same speed during the chase, and despite the presence of hundreds of TIE Fighters at the First Order's disposal, which were incredibly effective the one time they utilized their fighter superiority, this tactic is abandoned altogether by the First Order afterwards, for reasons unknown. All of these errors are acceptable, because as Pali rightfully points out, most Star Wars films have similar errors, including those from the original trilogy.

Here, however, are several things that I do have trouble with, and those are the things that ruined this movie as part of the Star Wars universe and killed this sequel trilogy for me for good:
1. Snoke mentions Vader as someone for Kylo Ren to aspire to, which is idiotic, because for a Dark Side adept - Vader is the ultimate traitor and false idol. He didn't just kill Palpatine, he RETURNED TO THE LIGHT SIDE OF THE FORCE AND SAVED HIS SON. This wasn't an egotistical act, to kill your master and usurp his power, which is indeed how Sith have operated for centuries, and that's how the cycle of the Order of Two works - when the apprentice is powerful enough to betray and kill his master he does so, himself becoming the master and taking a new apprentice, thus continuing the cycle (Pali himself seems to be aware of this, by pointing out that Snoke's killing was legitimate, and mentions Vader, but for some reason is unfazed at the idiocy of Snoke comparing his apprentice to Vader openly three times in the film, clearly admiring Vader). Vader killed Palpatine only to save Luke, and by doing this he also essentially killed himself by exposing himself to Palpatine's force lightning. It's an altruistic gesture, one of ultimate sacrifice and love towards your family member. Something a true Sith will never forgive or forget. If I remember correctly, Mara Jade only ever mentions Vader in Heir to the Empire as a traitor (she was never a Sith, just a Dark Side user at the time, but that's the only concrete example of how Vader was remembered by Dark Side users post-RofJ that comes to mind right now). Again, Vader being Kylo's grandfather does indeed potentially inherit him with some Dark Side potential, possibly, I am not disputing that. Even Kylo idolizing his Sith relative himself is one thing, but his master (at the time) Snoke referring to Kylo as "a new Vader" is just insultingly stupid and makes no fucking sense whatsoever in the context of what the Dark Side of the Force represents in general. It just goes against the basic concepts of this universe, and you don't have to even be aware of the EU to be able to point this out.
2. The handling of Luke Skywalker in the film. As brilliant as Mark Hamill was in TLJ, the ultimate fate of his character in it has disappointed me to no end. Whether or nor he is portrayed as a depressed and hopeless former Jedi master isn't even the point of great concern for me, because I understood that regardless of this he will eventually take part in the action one way or the other, which to some extent he did. So I will only talk about his demise in the film, and not even in the context of the universe. It appears that the decision to kill him off was made in the last possible moment, which partially explains the vanishing of his prosthetic hand alongside him (it was obviously easier to just remove him digitally sitting on that rock this way, without adding an extra scene of his prosthetic hand clunking to the ground). It also appears that Mark Hamill himself wasn't told the fate of his character, and he only found out that he actually dies at the end at the premiere of the film, and if true, this is an absolutely horrible treatment of him. I'm not even sure Rian Johnson himself wished to kill off Luke, and rumor has it that it was Kathleen Kennedy who did. Different people might react to Luke's passing in this film differently, but for me personally this means zero excitement before the next film. The one reason I was excited to see TFA was the see Luke, Han and Leia again. After Han's death in TFA, and Luke's almost complete absence in it, and after being greatly disappointed and let down by every new character in the film, pretty much the only reasons for my slight excitement for TLJ was to see Leia and hopefully Luke this time. It happened, but now we know that neither of the three main characters from the original trilogy will be playing a substantial part in Episode 9 due to both the events of TLJ and real life intervening in a tragic way. We might get Leia's death scene through CGI and Luke being there as a force ghost, but for me this isn't enough to incite any excitement for Episode 9. I really have no reason to see that movie in theaters when it comes out, even though being a Star Wars fan I probably still will. Still, I already know that there would be nothing for me in that film, and it's depressing, to be honest.

And you know what, that's it. Those are the major issues I had in this film which made me question Disney's understanding of this franchise even further. Everything else in it was either good, or not surprising. The new main characters in the film did not impress me, or seem believable and/or compelling even in TFA, so nothing that happened to them was really of any interest to me anyway. This is a subjective thing though, so I will not attribute it to my overall view of the film, I understand that Rian Johnson had no choice but to work with these pathetic characters the great Jeffrey Jacob Abrams has written for TFA, so I will never put him to blame for them not working for me here as well as in TFA. This is just the stench that TFA has carried onto TLJ, and it was to be expected, with TLJ being its sequel. Some of Johnson's writing choices however I did find a bit weird, with Poe essentially being an unassuming minor villain of the film. If this sequel trilogy had any pretenses of even in-universe realism or logicality, Poe should be court-martialed immediately at the start of Episode 9 for all the Resistance enlisted personnel deaths he singlehandedly caused in this film (leading both the successful, but suicidal for everyone bar himself bomber attack on the dreadnought, and the failed speeder attack on the walkers, during which every participant except Finn, Rose and Poe himself is killed), as well as his coup attempt. The Canto Bight plot line in the film has already been critisized so heavily by even the few people who loved the film, so I won't jump on the bandwagon here, and funnily enough I also didn't have as much of a problem with it (mainly because I don't care for the new characters of this sequel trilogy anyway, and don't mind films with slower pace, and also due to the addition of the surprisingly interesting character of DJ, who despite being essentially just a selfish version of Han Solo works for me, and seems almost like the only character in the film who understands how the universe is supposed to work). The way how even the badly written characters in TFA are getting even worse in TLJ was painful to be forced to see again. Hux is even more of a caricature of an Imperial villain, although to me it seems like Rian Johnson just doesn't know what better use to make of someone as one-dimensional in the first place. Neither does he seem to know how to handle Phasma, but considering how absolutely pathetic that character is to begin with, I feel like almost praising Johnson for just throwing her out in the garbage bin disgracefully the way he did. That really was the only way for her to go, there's nothing good to be done with something that thinly written to begin with. In the universe where so many incredible Imperial villains exist (Thrawn, Pellaeon (not even a villain, but a great fucking character, and an Imperial), Isard, Daala, Zsinj, Kaine, Delvardus, Harrsk, the Teradocs, etc.) it's painful to be subjected to someone as humorously amateurish, pathetically unintimidating and downright stupid as Hux and Phasma. Speaking of humor, the humor in the film was incredibly over-the-top, and the only jokes that worked for me were the ones between Luke and Rey (and I didn't mind Luke wiping his shoulder smugly after the walkers scene and him throwing the lightsaber over his shoulder in the beginning), and every scene with the porgs, who somehow landed well with me, possibly because I immediately realized that they are non-CGI, but actually puppets, which was a nice reference to the original trilogy, as well as the puppet Yoda, btw. I did, however, expect the overload of humor after TFA, and also was warned about it before the film by some friends, so it didn't of course come as a surprise. And since I will be watching this movie in the theater again, I will actually try to relax and pretend to be a normie Star Wars fan, which won't be difficult considering how hard it is to take almost anything in this film seriously to begin with. But I will try to replace my sarcastic smile with a genuine (fake) one. I'll try to trick myself, is what I'm saying. That's the length one has to go to enjoy this film as a Star Wars fan.

A lot of things that I dislike about the film are very subjective to me, and do not contribute to the overall standing of the film. Such as the disinteristing characters of Rey, Kylo Ren, Finn, Poe Dameron, Snoke, etc. They were present in TFA, and their presence in this film was obvious, so it's not like anything could be done in this regard for me. Rian Johnson does, however, prove to be a better writer (as if there was ever a question, really, but still) than JJA, with some new characters in this film being an improvement over those introduced in TFA. Namely Amilyn Holdo and DJ, but I found Rose to be quite charming as well. Kylo Ren and Finn are also developed better here than in TFA, but it's difficult for me to call this a drastic improvement, since the characters are still boring, and there's simply not much Rian could have done to remedy that. And whatever he does, Kylo is just not an intimidating villain to me, especially in the universe where Jacen Solo exists. Finn is ok, but he was never a particularly interesting character to start with. Even Johnson seems to realize his uselessness by relegating him to the least important storyline of the film. As for Rey being just a Mary Sue, I agree with Pali that it's no different in its essence to Luke and Anakin, but it's still disappointing to me that nothing is done to change this narrative flaw so apparent in all of Star Wars - having an all-powerful protagonist for no apparent reason. Surely it can be done, no? Instead we have just gotten a female version of that boring premise. Doesn't make it better or more interesting though, does it? But again, this issue was apparent in TFA, so it's just me repeating myself again. However, I don't remember ever reviewing TFA, so maybe this opinion had to be voiced here.

Considering all of the rules and laws of this new simple and predictable Star Wars universe laid down by TFA, I knew that it's not quite possible for me to love TLJ wholeheartedly or even to take it in any way seriously, so I'm never going to say that I expected greatness from it. Hell no, I just wanted to have a good time as a Star Wars fan, even being ready to ignore the one-dimensional nature of every character from TFA, and the general unoriginality of the whole thing. I just didn't anticipate being spat in the face by how they handled Luke, and by few universe-breaking things that would never have happened even in the prequel films or if Lucas was doing this trilogy (or a real Star Wars fan who knows his shit), such as Vader all of a sudden being a hero in the eyes of Dark Side users post-Endor, and some other nitpicky "Star Wars EU nerd" things, which I have forgotten about when I was writing about everything in-depth above, so I won't go heavily into it now, because it really wouldn't be something of concern for people who enjoyed the film anyway (we do see shields working in this film, but HOW they work is completely fucking illogical, regardless of the power of turbolaser fire withstanded by the shields, no fucking shield can survive 18 HOURS OF CONTINUOUS FIRE UPON IT, the shield generator will just drain, and will never be able to keep recharging for this long, but whatever). It really doesn't change anything.

If you enjoyed the film, then I'm happy for you, and I will not advise not to go see it to someone who hasn't, or anything. If you are able to not think of it as a Star Wars film while you're watching it, or if you're not much of a Star Wars fan to begin with, then I guess it's a fine sci-fi action film, with several surprising twists. It's an average film at best, but not nearly as stupid and unoriginal in its premise as TFA, even though it shares the same boring characters, which in itself is something that potentially ruins any future Episode with these guys in them. I can repeat my frustration at that Rian Johnson wasn't hired to write and direct TFA, because he would undoubtedly do a better job than the talentless fuck who I don't even want to mention by name at not only writing the first film in the new trilogy, but also at building the world and the characters for future installments. Instead, anyone who has ever dared to take this universe seriously was already doomed to suffer through these films, created by people who obviously never were fans of this thing, I don't care what the fuck JJ says, his work speaks for itself. All I can say, is that TLJ was less of a torture for a Star Wars fan than TFA was. If this is a compliment from me, it's a lukewarm one.

Having said that, I realize that we will never get anything better from the people running the show now. And since my journey to becoming a Star Wars fan (and discovering EU) started with the films, I still am unable, unfortunately, to completely ignore their existence. So I will try to watch TLJ in the cinema again, even though that'll require me to dumb myself down and pretend like I've never read an EU novel. Or better yet, not consider it being Star Wars at all. It all really feels more like an unofficial rip-off of it, with no soul of the original remaining. But sadly, that's all we are ever going to get, and fighting it is not a war we can win. So I'll give it another shot, by trying to adjust myself into it. Just because it's winter-time, the holidays, the Christmas spirit, or whatever it is, and I'm sad at not being able to enjoy myself watching a film that's supposedly a part of a franchise I was once a fan of.  :-\
« Last Edit: December 21, 2017, 06:40:16 AM by Major Grodin Tierce »
"To live is to suffer, to survive is to find some meaning in the suffering" - Friedrich Nietzsche

"Maybe those nihilist philosophers are right; maybe this is all we can expect of the universe, a relentless crushing of life and spirit, because the equilibrium state of the cosmos is death" - Arthur C. Clarke

"We even ignited the first atomic bomb on the day commemorating the transfiguration of Christ, thus unconsciously signaling that we intended likewise to transform the world, not only after the light but after darkness - with a blast that burned several times hotter than the surface of the sun." - Stanislav Grof, "Human Survival and Consciousness Evolution"


December 21, 2017, 07:45:30 AMReply #4

Offline Pali

  • Tester
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 790
  • Approval: +39/-2
    • View Profile
Re: The Last Jedi (SPOILERS SPOILERS LOTS OF SPOILERS YOUR FAULT SPOILERS)
« Reply #4 on: December 21, 2017, 07:45:30 AM »
Such as Luke disappearing along with his prosthetic hand, which should have remained on the ground where he vanished

Heh, this didn't occur to me at all, good catch.  I don't know that it definitely counts as an issue, as it's not like we have strong rules regarding Force ghosting and how the body becomes one with the Force - perhaps at that point he'd accepted the arm sufficiently that, so far as the Force within him was concerned, it was a part of him (and the rules that mechanicals don't feel the Force exist purely in books, not the movies) - but that's definitely a good nitpick.

Quote
1. Snoke mentions Vader as someone for Kylo Ren to aspire to, which is idiotic, because for a Dark Side adept - Vader is the ultimate traitor and false idol. He didn't just kill Palpatine, he RETURNED TO THE LIGHT SIDE OF THE FORCE AND SAVED HIS SON. This wasn't an egotistical act, to kill your master and usurp his power, which is indeed how Sith have operated for centuries, and that's how the cycle of the Order of Two works - when the apprentice is powerful enough to betray and kill his master he does so, himself becoming the master and taking a new apprentice, thus continuing the cycle (Pali himself seems to be aware of this, by pointing out that Snoke's killing was legitimate, and mentions Vader, but for some reason is unfazed at the idiocy of Snoke comparing his apprentice to Vader openly three times in the film, clearly admiring Vader). Vader killed Palpatine only to save Luke, and by doing this he also essentially killed himself by exposing himself to Palpatine's force lightning. It's an altruistic gesture, one of ultimate sacrifice and love towards your family member. Something a true Sith will never forgive or forget.

This depends on the assumption that Vader's last-minute turn is widely known, which I don't know has been at all established.  Even in the EU, it wasn't until I, Jedi's accounting of the Jedi Academy trilogy time period that I can recall Luke telling anyone other than Leia about Vader's redemption, seemingly because he realized that most people wouldn't be able or willing to accept it.  It's very possible that in the new timeline Snoke, Kylo Ren, and most of the galaxy don't even know it happened, and they just think that Luke defeated Vader and the Emperor on the Death Star II.  I freely grant that this is a hole that requires an assumption like the above by the viewer to fill, and should've been clearly addressed in some way by the new movies - a couple lines of dialogue indicating my hypothesis or something similar as the case would've been enough - but it's not a big enough hole to bother me.  I'm a Trekkie just as much as I'm a Star Wars fan - and as such I'm used to having to... adjust... continuity a bit to keep things coherent without letting it bother me. ;) If you ever want to see how far Trekkies go into doing that, visit the DaystromInstitute subreddit sometime and see how much we have to twist certain things there to make them work. :D

Regarding point 2) this is an aspect that I'm not sure any of us can really sway each other on even if we go on for a dozen pages here.  What treatment of a character feels right is just so subjective a matter that it's impossible to say that one take or another is the "true" portrayal.  I've seen enough feedback here and elsewhere that I like to think I have an understanding of why many weren't happy with it, Hamill included... but with respect to all, I can't help but like what we got.  I'm a romantic at heart, and one of my favorite tropes to see executed well is the optimist-turned-cynic redemption arc, and I found the version we got with Luke here very satisfying.

I don't agree that Poe was a minor villain - he was a hero who made honest mistakes and had lessons he needed to learn.  There is nothing wrong with that being a character arc in my view: good guys are more interesting when they screw up.

Quote
And whatever he does, Kylo is just not an intimidating villain to me, especially in the universe where Jacen Solo exists.

Personally, I don't think he's intended to really be intimidating (and in official canon, Jacen Solo doesn't exist ;)).  Star Wars has had plenty of intimidating villains, and I think they chose to go a new route with Kylo - he is, to me at least, a sympathetic villain.  He's a tragic character whose life just keeps pushing him in the wrong direction, so he tries to embrace that even as part of him is screaming that its wrong.  He's a character to pity more than fear in many ways, which is a type of villain rarely explored.

Quote
(we do see shields working in this film, but HOW they work is completely fucking illogical, regardless of the power of turbolaser fire withstanded by the shields, no fucking shield can survive 18 HOURS OF CONTINUOUS FIRE UPON IT, the shield generator will just drain, and will never be able to keep recharging for this long, but whatever)

In fairness to the movie, they do specifically mention that the ship is at the very edge of turbolaser range and that the shots won't do much but remind the Resistance that the First Order is there. (edit: and to again reference the first X-Wing book, when Corran Horn flies against Tycho Celchu the first time, Tycho very intentionally starts firing at maximum range where his shots won't do damage but will distract Corran's targeting - again, precedent for maximum-range shots doing no damage but having tactical utility nonetheless)

Quote
If you are able to not think of it as a Star Wars film while you're watching it, or if you're not much of a Star Wars fan to begin with, then I guess it's a fine sci-fi action film, with several surprising twists... All I can say, is that TLJ was less of a torture for a Star Wars fan than TFA was. If this is a compliment from me, it's a lukewarm one.

This is an attitude I do not like at all.  Respectfully, but you do not have the authority to define what a Star Wars fan is or what said fans may view as being properly Star Wars.  I've been a Star Wars fan for as long as I can remember - hell, I've got a Wraith Squadron patch-inspired tattoo of X-wings over the Rebel crest - and you are in no position to dictate whether or not I can enjoy this movie as a worthy addition to the saga.  I've seen the same kind of gatekeeping bullshit on Star Trek forums as purists claim people who enjoy DSC or the recent movies can't be real fans, and its just as much nonsense there as it is here.  Star Wars may mean different things to you and I, and you and I may enjoy different Star Wars stories and movies to varying degrees, but neither of us gets to tell the other that they aren't a fan - especially not just because you like specific Star Wars stories, concepts or characters I don't or vice versa.

It's interesting to me to note the disconnect between the movie's critical reception, fan reception I've seen online, and the reception of people I know IRL whether significant Star Wars fans or not.  Metacritic gives a critic review average of 86; a user average of 4.8.  Rotten Tomatoes has a 92% liked average for critics with an average 8.1 score, while users give a 54% liked with an average of 3.2/5 (or 6.4 of 10).  The worst review I've gotten from a person I know IRL is "I liked it, but it's definitely got some issues", which was from one person of the dozen+ I've discussed the movie with; the others all had a great time, though like me, none thought the movie perfect.  The critical reception and the people I know IRL seem to line up pretty well in agreement - a very solid addition to the saga, but with some room for improvement - it's the reception of people who view or identify themselves as Star Wars fans online that seems to stand out.
« Last Edit: December 21, 2017, 07:50:27 AM by Pali »

December 21, 2017, 09:31:27 AMReply #5

Offline tlmiller

  • Tester
  • Moff
  • *
  • Posts: 2,363
  • Approval: +56/-9
  • Don't turn around you moron, ATTACK!!!!!
    • View Profile
Re: The Last Jedi (SPOILERS SPOILERS LOTS OF SPOILERS YOUR FAULT SPOILERS)
« Reply #5 on: December 21, 2017, 09:31:27 AM »
I watched it on a pirate site, and I have to say:

1.  Glad I didn't spend the money to see this in the theatres.
2.  I can definitely see where some get and to a limited level agree with those that say it's a good sci-fi movie, but have trouble accepting it as Star Wars.
3.  BILLIONS of times better than TFA, but then, watching grass grow was better than TFA.
4.  I personally liked the fact that they finally injected some humor on purpose, I thought it made it much more watchable, even if some was...rough.
5.  Overall, good movie.  Not amazing, but good.  Won't purchase it, won't even probably ever watch it again.  But if I happen to be bored and it's on TV, I won't turn it off in disgust.
People should not be afraid of their government...governments should be afraid of their people.

December 21, 2017, 10:06:09 AMReply #6

Offline Grand Admiral Rufaan Tigellinus

  • Rear Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 160
  • Approval: +8/-0
  • One of the 13
    • View Profile
Re: The Last Jedi (SPOILERS SPOILERS LOTS OF SPOILERS YOUR FAULT SPOILERS)
« Reply #6 on: December 21, 2017, 10:06:09 AM »
Heh, this didn't occur to me at all, good catch.  I don't know that it definitely counts as an issue, as it's not like we have strong rules regarding Force ghosting and how the body becomes one with the Force - perhaps at that point he'd accepted the arm sufficiently that, so far as the Force within him was concerned, it was a part of him (and the rules that mechanicals don't feel the Force exist purely in books, not the movies) - but that's definitely a good nitpick.

Since posting my review of TLJ here, I have actually found an interview with Rian Johnson and Mark Hamill discussing the ending of the film where Rian voices his regret about this: "During the Q&A, Johnson also pointed out a slight flaw with the vanishing scene. “We were in the other room saying, ‘A steel hand should clunk to the ground.'" - so this is pretty much officially a blunder. Not a major one, of course, but still. In the same interview Hamill is clearly distraught about Luke's fate in the film. Here's the link, in case you're interested: http://ew.com/movies/2017/12/16/the-last-jedi-spoilers-rian-johnson-mark-hamill-luke-skywalker-revelations/2/

This depends on the assumption that Vader's last-minute turn is widely known, which I don't know has been at all established.  Even in the EU, it wasn't until I, Jedi's accounting of the Jedi Academy trilogy time period that I can recall Luke telling anyone other than Leia about Vader's redemption, seemingly because he realized that most people wouldn't be able or willing to accept it.  It's very possible that in the new timeline Snoke, Kylo Ren, and most of the galaxy don't even know it happened, and they just think that Luke defeated Vader and the Emperor on the Death Star II.  I freely grant that this is a hole that requires an assumption like the above by the viewer to fill, and should've been clearly addressed in some way by the new movies - a couple lines of dialogue indicating my hypothesis or something similar as the case would've been enough - but it's not a big enough hole to bother me.  I'm a Trekkie just as much as I'm a Star Wars fan - and as such I'm used to having to... adjust... continuity a bit to keep things coherent without letting it bother me. ;) If you ever want to see how far Trekkies go into doing that, visit the DaystromInstitute subreddit sometime and see how much we have to twist certain things there to make them work. :D

Well, you're right, I suppose it is slightly open to interpretation. But the one thing I will say is that Kylo Ren is also Ben Solo, which means that he grew up in the Solo family with Han and Leia, and obviously knew Luke very well, and he was also trained by him later. So I wouldn't say that it's a huge stretch to assume that Kylo/Ben knows about Vader's turn from Luke or Leia. And logically Snoke would have possibly become aware of it from Kylo. However, you are correct, there is still a chance of at least Snoke not knowing about Vader's demise, so I shouldn't have spoken about it so adamantly. Even though in reality I'm pretty sure that this was just neglect on Rian's part, who should not have included this reference and comparison in the film, because the absence of Vader's name in the script certainly wouldn't have changed anything in the story. But again, this started with TFA, and Kylo fanboying over Vader's helmet. And I disagree on this being a minor issue, it's not, if you respect the universe. I know that both you and I do, but it's an indication that JJ and possibly even Rian don't or don't care. This does bother me, not as an aspect of the film, but just such laziness on the writer's part. "Everyone loves Vader, let's just have his name in the script!". Again, it wasn't even necessary for the story at all, regardless of what one thinks of the story itself.

Regarding point 2) this is an aspect that I'm not sure any of us can really sway each other on even if we go on for a dozen pages here.  What treatment of a character feels right is just so subjective a matter that it's impossible to say that one take or another is the "true" portrayal.  I've seen enough feedback here and elsewhere that I like to think I have an understanding of why many weren't happy with it, Hamill included... but with respect to all, I can't help but like what we got.  I'm a romantic at heart, and one of my favorite tropes to see executed well is the optimist-turned-cynic redemption arc, and I found the version we got with Luke here very satisfying.

Well, I didn't say that I was against this version of Luke, I actually liked it. Making him a more conflicted character actually made him a little bit more dramatic. People are calling Rey Mary Sue, well, as much as I agree with it, Luke was the original Mary Sue, and I always thought of him as a bit boring, too. So this treatment certainly made him more interesting. What I did object to, was his death. I absolutely agree with Mark Hamill himself, that it had to occur in Ep. 9. He died at peace, yes, and it was a beautiful scene, with the twin sunset and all, but it's not like he died when the war is over, and evrything is done. No, quite the contrary. Now is the time when the Resistance needs him the most, so it doesn't really make much sence to kill him off now. I liked the force projection thing, but if you intended him to die, I'd rather he died in action. It pisses me off a little bit that he never actually left his island over the two films. Even though they have shown us that he still has his X-Wing. His death doesn't sit well with me, and I don't think it ever will, I trully have no reason to wait for 9 now. I'm only talking about myself though.

I don't agree that Poe was a minor villain - he was a hero who made honest mistakes and had lessons he needed to learn.  There is nothing wrong with that being a character arc in my view: good guys are more interesting when they screw up.

Well, maybe, but people died. When you "mess up", and it results in dozens of unnecessary deaths of your own people.... In real life you go to jail for such things, even if you're the kindest person in the world, and your intentions were always the best. Poe was demoted to commander, while in reality he should have been arrested and court-martialled. He wasn't, and only more people died because of him later. I have nothing against Poe, he's not the worst character in this trilogy for me, but this is just some shoddy writing.

Personally, I don't think he's intended to really be intimidating (and in official canon, Jacen Solo doesn't exist ;)).  Star Wars has had plenty of intimidating villains, and I think they chose to go a new route with Kylo - he is, to me at least, a sympathetic villain.  He's a tragic character whose life just keeps pushing him in the wrong direction, so he tries to embrace that even as part of him is screaming that its wrong.  He's a character to pity more than fear in many ways, which is a type of villain rarely explored.

Well, again, this was subjective on my part. He didn't work for me, personally, but that's just me. But your interpretation of him is also subjective. But this is not something obvious, where there is a right or wrong opinion (as most of this, if not all, really). As for Jacen Solo, by universe, I meant ours.  :D He certainly exists in my world, as a character.

In fairness to the movie, they do specifically mention that the ship is at the very edge of turbolaser range and that the shots won't do much but remind the Resistance that the First Order is there. (edit: and to again reference the first X-Wing book, when Corran Horn flies against Tycho Celchu the first time, Tycho very intentionally starts firing at maximum range where his shots won't do damage but will distract Corran's targeting - again, precedent for maximum-range shots doing no damage but having tactical utility nonetheless)

Thanks for the reference, it was probably not a very good observation on my part, or the most nitpicky nitpick of all. I'm happy to admit that I was wrong.  ;)

This is an attitude I do not like at all.  Respectfully, but you do not have the authority to define what a Star Wars fan is or what said fans may view as being properly Star Wars.  I've been a Star Wars fan for as long as I can remember - hell, I've got a Wraith Squadron patch-inspired tattoo of X-wings over the Rebel crest - and you are in no position to dictate whether or not I can enjoy this movie as a worthy addition to the saga.  I've seen the same kind of gatekeeping bullshit on Star Trek forums as purists claim people who enjoy DSC or the recent movies can't be real fans, and its just as much nonsense there as it is here.  Star Wars may mean different things to you and I, and you and I may enjoy different Star Wars stories and movies to varying degrees, but neither of us gets to tell the other that they aren't a fan - especially not just because you like specific Star Wars stories, concepts or characters I don't or vice versa.

Whoah, whoah! I wasn't referring to you, chill, dude, chill! Please, be reasonable!  :) By "you", I meant whomever is reading that comment. None of it was a direct response to you, btw. If you didn't notice, I referred to you earlier twice in third person. I know that you're a Star Wars fan, and would never tell any other Star Wars fan what to do and what not to do, as well as what defines a Star Wars fan, and I've specifically stated that I'm not advising anyone to not watch this film. It saddens me that this is how you see me, but it's probably because you haven't paid attention while reading my comment, which is fine, it was a very long-winded one. It's cool that you have SW tattoos, that's great! I have several, too, but none of them SW-related, SO FAR! But you never know ;D

It's interesting to me to note the disconnect between the movie's critical reception, fan reception I've seen online, and the reception of people I know IRL whether significant Star Wars fans or not.  Metacritic gives a critic review average of 86; a user average of 4.8.  Rotten Tomatoes has a 92% liked average for critics with an average 8.1 score, while users give a 54% liked with an average of 3.2/5 (or 6.4 of 10).  The worst review I've gotten from a person I know IRL is "I liked it, but it's definitely got some issues", which was from one person of the dozen+ I've discussed the movie with; the others all had a great time, though like me, none thought the movie perfect.  The critical reception and the people I know IRL seem to line up pretty well in agreement - a very solid addition to the saga, but with some room for improvement - it's the reception of people who view or identify themselves as Star Wars fans online that seems to stand out.

Well, in my case it's pretty much 50/50 when it comes to appreciation of this film amongst the SW fans I know. But those are interesting stats, and I've noticed the incredibly low audience score on RT.

It's always a pleasure debating Star Wars with you, Pali, you're a very interesting opponent, maybe time will come for something for us to agree upon, one day, just for a change. ;D Have a great day, whatever you're doing, and may the force be with you, my friend! Thanks for your time, I really enjoyed our conversation, and your optimism is contagious, I have to say  ;)
« Last Edit: December 21, 2017, 10:43:17 AM by Major Grodin Tierce »
"To live is to suffer, to survive is to find some meaning in the suffering" - Friedrich Nietzsche

"Maybe those nihilist philosophers are right; maybe this is all we can expect of the universe, a relentless crushing of life and spirit, because the equilibrium state of the cosmos is death" - Arthur C. Clarke

"We even ignited the first atomic bomb on the day commemorating the transfiguration of Christ, thus unconsciously signaling that we intended likewise to transform the world, not only after the light but after darkness - with a blast that burned several times hotter than the surface of the sun." - Stanislav Grof, "Human Survival and Consciousness Evolution"


December 21, 2017, 10:16:22 AMReply #7

Offline Grand Admiral Rufaan Tigellinus

  • Rear Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 160
  • Approval: +8/-0
  • One of the 13
    • View Profile
Re: The Last Jedi (SPOILERS SPOILERS LOTS OF SPOILERS YOUR FAULT SPOILERS)
« Reply #7 on: December 21, 2017, 10:16:22 AM »
3.  BILLIONS of times better than TFA, but then, watching grass grow was better than TFA.

Lol, brutal, but true.

but have trouble accepting it as Star Wars.

Yep, me too.  :-[
"To live is to suffer, to survive is to find some meaning in the suffering" - Friedrich Nietzsche

"Maybe those nihilist philosophers are right; maybe this is all we can expect of the universe, a relentless crushing of life and spirit, because the equilibrium state of the cosmos is death" - Arthur C. Clarke

"We even ignited the first atomic bomb on the day commemorating the transfiguration of Christ, thus unconsciously signaling that we intended likewise to transform the world, not only after the light but after darkness - with a blast that burned several times hotter than the surface of the sun." - Stanislav Grof, "Human Survival and Consciousness Evolution"


December 21, 2017, 12:49:46 PMReply #8

Offline turtle225

  • Brevet Admiral
  • ****
  • Posts: 101
  • Approval: +3/-0
  • Location: Shell
    • View Profile
Re: The Last Jedi (SPOILERS SPOILERS LOTS OF SPOILERS YOUR FAULT SPOILERS)
« Reply #8 on: December 21, 2017, 12:49:46 PM »
Sorry that I won't be touching on everyone's comments (there's a lot going on here) but there's some things I want to get into.

I'll admit that I have a lot of nitpicks about minor things and you can troll most movies in that way. But there are plenty of BIG logic problems as well that I mentioned above that I feel justified in complaining about.

World Building:
- While it is true that the original trilogy doesn't explain the empire to the last detail or the origins of the emperor, it doesn't actually have to. Hear me out. ANH establishes that there is an empire and living under it sucks (they blow up planets if they don't like you, not fun). But that's really all you need to know to empathize with the main characters and understand why there is a rebellion and what they are fighting for. Skip ahead to 7/8 where we basically have the same exact setup. The first order I evil because they blow up planets blah, and we must fight them. But it doesn't work this time because this isn't a new story and new universe. You can't just have a 25 year time skip and not explain what happened. At the end of RotJ the heroes win the battle and secure the peace they were fighting for (we know from EU that it wasn't that simple but from the trilogy's standpoint, the heroes had achieved their goal). Then 7 and 8 come along and where the force is that peace out heroes fought and bled to achieve? What happened to the New Republic Leia wanted to build? Why is the First Order stronger than the Empire ever was? Why is the new resistance so weak? What the heck was the point of the original trilogy if nothing has improved 25 years later? They OWE us that world building because our original characters are still here. What have they been doing? Why didn't they succeed?

Holdo is a terrible character:
- I'm surprised that you guys seem to be defending her. You want to talk about sleeper minor villains? That would be her. You say that Poe doesn't need to know? There might be a leak? Poe is their "best" pilot you really think he's going to be a leak? She doesn't even say anything when they are holding her at gunpoint. I think when your crew is staging a mutiny, they kind of need to know that you aren't just some inept commander that is going to get them all killed. Finn and Poe's entire role in the movie can be negated if she just tells them her plan. Then Holdo openly admits to Leia that she actually likes Poe (even though she has been a jerk to him this whole time) and then she stays behind to martyr and redeem herself so the audience won't hate her like they should. She spends the entire movie pulling rank to tell everyone to shut up and listen to her without actually giving anybody a real reason to shut up and listen to her.

Critical vs. fan reception:
- Of course the critics are praising it. You really shouldn't ever trust critic scores for anything (movies, games, tv, whatever). There is often a very high chance that the critics are being paid off for good reviews and this isn't just me being cynical. It's just smart business. You think megacorp Disney would allow anybody to give them a bad review? The more money a company has to flight around the less likely you will see bad "reviews." Critics said TFA was a good movie too but we all agree that it sucked right? This, aside from some YouTube comments is the only place that I've seen anybody who actually liked the movie. I saw the movie with two friends who are not as nerd as I am but they didn't like it either. My dad and sisters didn't like it either and they are definitely casual. I would not agree with the claim that the only people who don't like it are vocal Star Wars nerds.

Luke was NOT a Mary Sue:
- And neither were Jacen/Jaina/Anakin either. Just being strong in the force with little training does not make one a Mary Sue.
  https://www.reddit.com/r/StarWars/comments/3xxi10/luke_skywalker_is_not_a_mary_sue_anh_spoilers/
That sums it up quite nicely. Just because Luke destroys the Death Star with little Jedi training does not make him a Mary Sue. Contrast to Rey who can fly and FIX the Falcon after being stranded on Jakku all her life, who can mind control stormtroopers, fight elite guards, fight Kylo Ren, lift a ton of rocks, oh and beat Luke himself in a "duel" with no training. None. 7/8 take place over the span of like a week and yet she can already beat the hero of this universe in combat? Her only "flaw" if you can call it that, is that she is hung up on her parents, but it isn't like it ever prevents her from accomplishing anything so I don't even think it counts. The only time she struggles in either movie is against Snoke, but that lasts a whole two minutes. Luke went through immense growth from 4-6. Has Rey grown from 7-8? Not really. The only thing that has changed is that she seems to have accepted that her parents were jerks.

Luke's character arc:
- Luke is ruined plain and simple. Destroyed. Spat on. He is a cynic now because his nephew turned to the dark side and killed his school? Welp, guess the Jedi suck might as well go die. No. In episode 6, Luke lets himself get captured so that he can try and turn his father (the second most evil person in the galaxy) to the light because he senses some good in him. Fast forward to 8 and Luke is considering KILLING his nephew because he is showing dark side tendencies. Are you kidding me? It is such a betrayal of Luke's character that it is beyond insulting. Mark Hamill even agrees. Everything about Luke in this movie is wrong. He is a completely different character. Sure you would expect him to change after 25 years but to think he would forget all of the lessons and trials he learned and went though in the original is ridiculous. The movie's handling of Luke is the single greatest sin in the entire new trilogy. Luke could be written out of the story and have died ten years ago to Star Wars equivalent of cancer and the new trilogy would be improved by it.

They butchered Han too but that was Abrams. I don't know why you guys are trying to hard so defend Johnson. He did a downright awful job and you can't blame it all on JJ.

Sorry, I'm ranting again. Please don't take my negative tone as offensive. I'm just really jaded. I will not be paying Disney another dollar for their butchering of my favorite series. Don't get me wrong I'll be curious when 9 comes out but there's no way I'll go pay for it unless everybody (not critics) turns around and says it saved the trilogy or something. But with Abrams at the helm and the pile of crud the last two movies were, that would be more than a miracle.

December 21, 2017, 02:34:24 PMReply #9

Offline tlmiller

  • Tester
  • Moff
  • *
  • Posts: 2,363
  • Approval: +56/-9
  • Don't turn around you moron, ATTACK!!!!!
    • View Profile
Re: The Last Jedi (SPOILERS SPOILERS LOTS OF SPOILERS YOUR FAULT SPOILERS)
« Reply #9 on: December 21, 2017, 02:34:24 PM »
But with Abrams at the helm and the pile of crud that everything he has ever touched in his entire life has been, that would be more than a miracle.

fixed.
People should not be afraid of their government...governments should be afraid of their people.

December 21, 2017, 04:30:37 PMReply #10

Offline Pali

  • Tester
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 790
  • Approval: +39/-2
    • View Profile
Re: The Last Jedi (SPOILERS SPOILERS LOTS OF SPOILERS YOUR FAULT SPOILERS)
« Reply #10 on: December 21, 2017, 04:30:37 PM »
And I disagree on this being a minor issue, it's not, if you respect the universe. I know that both you and I do, but it's an indication that JJ and possibly even Rian don't or don't care. This does bother me, not as an aspect of the film, but just such laziness on the writer's part. "Everyone loves Vader, let's just have his name in the script!". Again, it wasn't even necessary for the story at all, regardless of what one thinks of the story itself.

I wouldn't go that far - it makes sense that if Snoke wants to make Kylo feel like a failure he'd use Vader as the comparison if only because Snoke knows how much Kylo idolized Vader.

Quote
Well, maybe, but people died. When you "mess up", and it results in dozens of unnecessary deaths of your own people.... In real life you go to jail for such things, even if you're the kindest person in the world, and your intentions were always the best. Poe was demoted to commander, while in reality he should have been arrested and court-martialled. He wasn't, and only more people died because of him later. I have nothing against Poe, he's not the worst character in this trilogy for me, but this is just some shoddy writing.

Definitely true, but the Resistance - especially in TLJ - is small, informal relative to most established militaries, and by this point almost out of people.  Rules get bent when there are only a few hundred of you facing massive odds and the violator is your best warrior. Edit: a good example of this happening even when the guy in charge really doesn't like or even trust the warrior in question comes from how Alfred deals with Uhtred in The Last Kingdom; Uhtred gets a lot of leeway simply because he's the best fighter Wessex has and Alfred knows that he's needed.

Quote
As for Jacen Solo, by universe, I meant ours.  :D He certainly exists in my world, as a character.

I know, I was just teasing. ;)

Quote
Whoah, whoah! I wasn't referring to you, chill, dude, chill! Please, be reasonable!  :) By "you", I meant whomever is reading that comment. None of it was a direct response to you, btw. If you didn't notice, I referred to you earlier twice in third person. I know that you're a Star Wars fan, and would never tell any other Star Wars fan what to do and what not to do, as well as what defines a Star Wars fan, and I've specifically stated that I'm not advising anyone to not watch this film. It saddens me that this is how you see me, but it's probably because you haven't paid attention while reading my comment, which is fine, it was a very long-winded one. It's cool that you have SW tattoos, that's great! I have several, too, but none of them SW-related, SO FAR! But you never know ;D

Apologies for the misunderstanding then - a combination of me having dealt with that sentiment an annoying amount lately and me being about two minutes from falling asleep after a long day can leave me a bit trigger-happy.

Holdo is a terrible character:
- I'm surprised that you guys seem to be defending her. You want to talk about sleeper minor villains? That would be her. You say that Poe doesn't need to know? There might be a leak? Poe is their "best" pilot you really think he's going to be a leak?

That's not how operational security works.  The concern isn't that Poe or any other specific person is a traitor, the concern is that the more information is spread, the more likely it will leak out somehow.  Poe definitely isn't going to intentionally betray the Resistance, but can a hothead pilot who was just demoted for disobeying orders be trusted to not, say, tell a fellow pilot or friend who is just as worried as he is?  And do you trust who that person might tell?  Do you trust that they aren't told in a room that the enemy may have snuck a listening device into?  Wedge Antilles was never going to betray the New Republic either, but Blackmoon being Borleias was still kept from him by Ackbar because he didn't need to know.  And as another general rule, most military commanders aren't going to feel very inclined to grant the demands of mutineers.

Quote
Of course the critics are praising it. You really shouldn't ever trust critic scores for anything (movies, games, tv, whatever). There is often a very high chance that the critics are being paid off for good reviews and this isn't just me being cynical. It's just smart business. You think megacorp Disney would allow anybody to give them a bad review? The more money a company has to flight around the less likely you will see bad "reviews." Critics said TFA was a good movie too but we all agree that it sucked right?

No, we don't - I enjoyed TFA plenty, and Rogue One I absolutely loved; I rate it around the same level as I do RotJ.  And as someone who agrees with the critics' consensus, I don't feel any need to assume that their take is somehow disingenuous - somehow I'm not shocked when people agree with me on things. ;)
« Last Edit: December 21, 2017, 04:35:34 PM by Pali »

December 21, 2017, 07:45:44 PMReply #11

Offline Pali

  • Tester
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 790
  • Approval: +39/-2
    • View Profile
Re: The Last Jedi (SPOILERS SPOILERS LOTS OF SPOILERS YOUR FAULT SPOILERS)
« Reply #11 on: December 21, 2017, 07:45:44 PM »
I don't have time for another long post, but the Reddit thread below has a lot of great discussion regarding how Luke was handled here that roughly parallels why I'm quite happy with what we got from TLJ regarding him.

https://www.reddit.com/r/StarWars/comments/7l9m4c/spoilers_lets_talk_about_luke_skywalker/
« Last Edit: December 21, 2017, 07:59:46 PM by Pali »

December 22, 2017, 10:52:48 AMReply #12

Offline Lord Xizer

  • Tester
  • Grand Moff
  • *
  • Posts: 3,222
  • Approval: +134/-14
  • Nothing shall withstand my ambition.
    • View Profile
Re: The Last Jedi (SPOILERS SPOILERS LOTS OF SPOILERS YOUR FAULT SPOILERS)
« Reply #12 on: December 22, 2017, 10:52:48 AM »
(Am multitasking atm so will condense mine)

The Good:
Effects and style of filming were decent.
Acting for the most part.
Slightly improved soundtrack over TFA.

The Bad:
Rey's 'development' if you want to call it that.
The plot is fairly cliche, not so much a remake of ESB, but obviously a homage with bits of RotJ.
Character decision making usually being painfully stupid.
Too much humor, felt like a running gag far too often.

The Ugly:
Luke, pretty much EVERYTHING until he sacrifices himself felt NOTHING like what Luke would do. It was so badly out of character even Hamill commented on it.
Snoke was built up and then not really done anything with at all. Felt like they just kinda scrapped that.
Rey being insanely good at EVERYTHING, Luke doesn't even really train her so much as gawk and serve to be the fuckup to her. This is beyond Anakin OP and Luke  OP. She doesn't have to work or have an explanation for being just Mary damned Sue(empowerment I guess, gotta check that box) Anakin was conceived by Force manipulation was originally Lucas idea to have Palpatine be his father in that sense, so it makes sense he'd be strong, Luke has Anakin's DNA as his son, makes sense he'd be strong. Rey's just a cosmic friggen accident of feminine power perfection.
Rose, her entire addition felt extremely forced.
"I do not intend to be the Emperor's servant forever..."-High Inquisitor Jerec

"The New Order has never fallen. Only the Emperor."-Grand Moff Ardus Kaine

December 22, 2017, 11:09:11 AMReply #13

Offline Lord Xizer

  • Tester
  • Grand Moff
  • *
  • Posts: 3,222
  • Approval: +134/-14
  • Nothing shall withstand my ambition.
    • View Profile
"I do not intend to be the Emperor's servant forever..."-High Inquisitor Jerec

"The New Order has never fallen. Only the Emperor."-Grand Moff Ardus Kaine

December 22, 2017, 03:50:57 PMReply #14

Offline Pali

  • Tester
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 790
  • Approval: +39/-2
    • View Profile
Re: The Last Jedi (SPOILERS SPOILERS LOTS OF SPOILERS YOUR FAULT SPOILERS)
« Reply #14 on: December 22, 2017, 03:50:57 PM »
Like everyone, Hamill's got the right to his opinion - I simply disagree.  That someone is a Jedi doesn't stop them from being human, doesn't stop them from being able to be emotionally or mentally broken by traumatic events, doesn't stop them from making horrible mistakes that they can be consumed by guilt over.

Luke's attempt to train Ben Solo is, quite simply, the greatest failure of his entire life.  He took the child of his sister and his best friend, and he failed to prevent that child from falling to the dark - more than that, because of a moment's weakness he may well be what gave Ben the final push in the dark's direction, and because of that everything he worked for was destroyed and everyone he trained either also fell to the dark or was slaughtered.  On top of that, this failure mirrors the failure of the old Jedi as well, as in many ways it was their fault that Anakin Skywalker fell to the dark side.  So you have a character whose life dreams of restoring the Jedi are utterly shattered because of his own actions, who has failed on a personal level the people he cares about most, and who is likely now suffering from a great deal of survivor's guilt and PTSD after the deaths or betrayals of his students and the destruction of his school.

I have no trouble seeing this chain of events as one that could break someone, even someone as good as Luke.  I have no trouble seeing this chain of events as one that would leave Luke feeling like he's repeating the mistakes of the old Jedi, and that any more intervention on his part will only make things worse.

December 22, 2017, 04:37:52 PMReply #15

Offline Slornie

  • Mod Team Member
  • Moff
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,759
  • Approval: +54/-13
  • Every Silver Lining has a Cloud
    • View Profile
Re: The Last Jedi (SPOILERS SPOILERS LOTS OF SPOILERS YOUR FAULT SPOILERS)
« Reply #15 on: December 22, 2017, 04:37:52 PM »
I really liked The Last Jedi.  From a first watching I'd probably put it somewhere top three (and obviously above all of the prequels).  There were lots of similarities with both ESB and RotJ, but I feel the way those elements were brought together and reinterpreted here worked well.

The great:

- Luke's Force projection on Crait.  At first I was like "now how is he supposed to have got there?" but quickly decided it had to be a projection.
 That entire sequence was utterly brilliant and especially the way Hux/Kylo Ren reacted to the event.

- Kylo and Leia sensing each others presence and Kylo then being unable to fire on his own mother (after killing Han last movie), only for his wingmen to destroy the bridge right in front of him.  At this point he believes she is dead but i can't rightly remember if he later learnt otherwise?

- Luke and Rey, and Rey and Kylo conversations.  I loved the interaction between these pairs, and the latter in particular was quite a divergence from what we've seen before (I don't have any problem with that manifestation of the Force).


The good:

- Porgs and cystal foxes.  Loved the new fauna, although seeing the origin of blue milk was a bit weird!

- Luke's struggle with the Jedi legacy (including his failures as a teacher, which mirrors the old EU well) and the re-appearance of Yoda's Force ghost (glad they didn't try to cram Ewan McGregor in as a weirdly younger Old Ben too!).


The bad:

- Poe Dameron single handedly taking out all of the turrets on the Dreadnought.  They're bigger than his fighter yet they all went *poof* just like that.  Also does that thing have no shields?

- Drawn out suspense scene with gunner in the bomber ship thing during the battle to destroy the Dreadnought.  I assume that was supposed to be a moment for the audience to emotionally connect with the battle and Resistance sacrifice, but it just left me cold.  It's been used too often in various movies (wasn't there even a similar bit in Rogue One?) and this version wasn't particularly original.

- The Dreadnought itself.  Big black super ship with a giant cannon on the bottom.  All I can think of is Benedict CumberKhan's line from Star Trek Into Darkness: "Dreadnought class: two times the size, three times the speed, advanced weaponry, modified for a minimal crew.".  It's like Disney just lifted that concept wholesale from Paramount's movie.


The ugly:

- Lizard washerwomen on Ahch-To.  Seriously??
- Captain Phasma.  Utterly pointless character.  Saved from near certain death in the last movie for no reason whatsoever.


Various unrelated longer thoughts:

I feel some of the continuity in the movie was rather haphazard.  The bit that has stuck in my mind is the scenes in the giantbatwingthing hangar (no idea what that ship was actually called) which got rather fuzzy.  Before the ship was hit by hyperspace Raddus Finn and Rose are on the floor with Plasma/stormtroopers right next to them, yet in the next moment when the hangar is in flames Plasma and the stormtroopers are all the way across the deck heading back towards her prisoners? Wtf? Also thought it was rather convenient that the shuttle over by the exit was miraculously the only thing undamaged!

With regards to what happened to Luke at the end of the movie, I'm actually quite happy with it.  He's choosing his own time of passing and is at peace with his legacy (Yoda still handing out lessons from beyond the grave).  I also thought it nicely reflected both Yoda and Old Ben's deaths from the OT (i.e. there's almost a "if you strike me down I'll become more powerful than you can possibly imagine" subtext between Luke and Kylo).  I'm also in two minds about that last strike of Kylo's lightsaber to projection-Luke and whether despite the metaphysical separation there was some real impact to Luke (he seemed to react to the saber).

Honestly, I feel Finn was dis-served by Rose's save in those last moments.  For me he's always been the weakest of the new hero characters and seems only to exist as a plot device (hey, I'ma rescue the named pilot, hey I know where the weapon control doo-da is, hey I know where the secret hyperspace tracker is on the supreme leader's ship even though I've probably never been on it before).  Allowing him to go out a proper hero, sacrificing himself for the greater good of his new-found friends and the Resistance, seemed like a good end.

The throne room scene with Snoke/Rey/Kylo was interesting.  Harks back to both RotJ and RotS, where Palpatine was trying to manipulate Anakin and Luke, but I like how it was changed up so Snoke is the one being played.  Kylo using the Force purposely to turn Rey's lightsaber into Snoke's side was a masterstroke for me.  However I'm still in two minds about whether or not that was actually Snoke there, or just a puppet with the real Snoke yet to be revealed.  I'm also wondering about Kylo's un-reveal about Rey's non-lineage.  Was he telling the truth, or was it merely a clever falsehood to undermine her self-confidence and beliefs as part of his attempt to turn her to his side?
Quote from: RonMaverick291 (Gametrailers)
why do u hate america? if it were not for us u guys would be lost. i mean we invented the tv, we invented the internet, cars and we even went to the planet moon. we won all the wars and we always help the little countries who cant fight and we give food to poor people.

December 22, 2017, 07:00:29 PMReply #16

Offline turtle225

  • Brevet Admiral
  • ****
  • Posts: 101
  • Approval: +3/-0
  • Location: Shell
    • View Profile
Re: The Last Jedi (SPOILERS SPOILERS LOTS OF SPOILERS YOUR FAULT SPOILERS)
« Reply #16 on: December 22, 2017, 07:00:29 PM »
Like everyone, Hamill's got the right to his opinion - I simply disagree.  That someone is a Jedi doesn't stop them from being human, doesn't stop them from being able to be emotionally or mentally broken by traumatic events, doesn't stop them from making horrible mistakes that they can be consumed by guilt over.

Luke's attempt to train Ben Solo is, quite simply, the greatest failure of his entire life.  He took the child of his sister and his best friend, and he failed to prevent that child from falling to the dark - more than that, because of a moment's weakness he may well be what gave Ben the final push in the dark's direction, and because of that everything he worked for was destroyed and everyone he trained either also fell to the dark or was slaughtered.  On top of that, this failure mirrors the failure of the old Jedi as well, as in many ways it was their fault that Anakin Skywalker fell to the dark side.  So you have a character whose life dreams of restoring the Jedi are utterly shattered because of his own actions, who has failed on a personal level the people he cares about most, and who is likely now suffering from a great deal of survivor's guilt and PTSD after the deaths or betrayals of his students and the destruction of his school.

I have no trouble seeing this chain of events as one that could break someone, even someone as good as Luke.  I have no trouble seeing this chain of events as one that would leave Luke feeling like he's repeating the mistakes of the old Jedi, and that any more intervention on his part will only make things worse.

You seem to not fully appreciate that the entire catalyst to everything is that Luke was going to KILL his nephew (the child of his sister and best friend as you point out) because he was showing dark side tendencies. I don't even care if it was a "moment of weakness." As I have already pointed out, this betrays Luke's character to a degree so absurd that it is a wonder if Johnson even watched the original trilogy. Luke jumps through hoops to bring Vader back on the slim chance he could save him and yet for some reason Kylo is so lost that he should be murdered when he is still in jedi school? Even if you like Luke's character on the island, how can you even accept that he would have gotten there to begin with? His trauma should never have happened.

It would be like Leia blowing up a planet with a Death Star and then going through this arc where she's all regretful or whatever and she made a mistake. Ridiculous right? So is Luke in this movie. His actions undermine the very themes that drove the original trilogy.

December 22, 2017, 08:14:57 PMReply #17

Offline Pali

  • Tester
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 790
  • Approval: +39/-2
    • View Profile
Re: The Last Jedi (SPOILERS SPOILERS LOTS OF SPOILERS YOUR FAULT SPOILERS)
« Reply #17 on: December 22, 2017, 08:14:57 PM »
Luke also had a moment in RotJ where he was an inch away from killing his father after already slicing his hand off, and he had to pause and pull back from doing so.  He had a vision of the darkness within Ben and for a split second reacted with the thought "I need to prevent this" - and then again stopped himself.  No, I do not see this as in any way a betrayal of the character.

Edit: I liked how this moment was handled a lot, actually - it ties very well into Kenobi's adage of the truth depending on our point of view.  From Kylo's, Luke tried to kill him.  From Luke's, it was the culminating moment of Luke's long-term failure of Ben.  From Rey's, it was a screw-up on Luke's part, but the real failure remains Ben's.

Edit 2: Also, I seem to recall Luke sanctioning and assisting in killing Jacen Solo (and was about to kill Jacen personally until his own son demanded to do it himself) and Luke during the Vong war being far too passive with the Jedi because he took their failures as his personal fault until Vergere reminded him how egotistical that was...
« Last Edit: December 22, 2017, 08:39:53 PM by Pali »

December 22, 2017, 09:24:58 PMReply #18

Offline Lord Xizer

  • Tester
  • Grand Moff
  • *
  • Posts: 3,222
  • Approval: +134/-14
  • Nothing shall withstand my ambition.
    • View Profile
Re: The Last Jedi (SPOILERS SPOILERS LOTS OF SPOILERS YOUR FAULT SPOILERS)
« Reply #18 on: December 22, 2017, 09:24:58 PM »
Like everyone, Hamill's got the right to his opinion - I simply disagree.  That someone is a Jedi doesn't stop them from being human, doesn't stop them from being able to be emotionally or mentally broken by traumatic events, doesn't stop them from making horrible mistakes that they can be consumed by guilt over.

Luke's attempt to train Ben Solo is, quite simply, the greatest failure of his entire life.  He took the child of his sister and his best friend, and he failed to prevent that child from falling to the dark - more than that, because of a moment's weakness he may well be what gave Ben the final push in the dark's direction, and because of that everything he worked for was destroyed and everyone he trained either also fell to the dark or was slaughtered.  On top of that, this failure mirrors the failure of the old Jedi as well, as in many ways it was their fault that Anakin Skywalker fell to the dark side.  So you have a character whose life dreams of restoring the Jedi are utterly shattered because of his own actions, who has failed on a personal level the people he cares about most, and who is likely now suffering from a great deal of survivor's guilt and PTSD after the deaths or betrayals of his students and the destruction of his school.

I have no trouble seeing this chain of events as one that could break someone, even someone as good as Luke.  I have no trouble seeing this chain of events as one that would leave Luke feeling like he's repeating the mistakes of the old Jedi, and that any more intervention on his part will only make things worse.

There's being human Pali and there's literally doing the exact opposite of everything you are as a person. Yea, I get it, Luke fouled up, but based on who he is and his development he would not do what this film says he did. Luke would do everything in his power and beyond to TRY and fix it, to do SOMETHING, that's who he is and what he does. It's utterly inconceivable that the Luke I saw risk EVERYTHING including his own life to redeem Darth Vader just because there was SOME good in him, save his friends and the Rebellion would first off contemplate murdering someone for something they haven't even done and then ABANDON his friends, family and the galaxy just to hide away. If he was trying to find some way or secret to making it right I could see him TELLING Leia and Han he had to do so and MAYBE be gone a year tops. Hamill PLAYED this character for a decade, and has had four decades of media, fans and the like to further delve into who Luke is as a character and when he himself is pointing this out it's not so much an opinion as a pretty solidly backed statement by an expert on Luke himself as a character. The film flies right in the face of who and what Luke was and not even for a good reason, it's just to cast light on the NEW faces by comparison, it's why the character change feels so jarring and frankly uncharacteristic.

A comparison to this would be if Gandalf felt bad he convinced Frodo to go to his likely death so he went into the wild while Sauron annihilated Middle Earth. It would be contrary to literally his entire being, just as this travesty did with Luke. Your comparison of his action in RotJ against Vader is also not accurate in his decision with Ben, against Vader he flew into a blind rage at Vader's threat against Leia, with Ben he was making a cold, DELIBERATE decision to kill his nephew, not heat of the moment battle high, Luke Skywalker, actively contemplating MURDER against someone who hadn't even gone over yet. So yeah, I see that and his self imposed pity exile as a pretty big betrayal of the character.

You might recall also that during the Vong War he still took action, he was involved and saved lives. he didn't exile himself, he just didn't see the Jedi needing to be the NR's new SF. As to Jacen Solo, I'd point out he also gave him chances to come back, Jacen plunged the Galaxy into a war(not just Luke's fear of IF he might) and Jacen had no qualms about killing Luke or any of the old gang so again it's measuring what Kylo MIGHT do against what Jacen HAD ALREADY done, so it doesn't really compare again.
"I do not intend to be the Emperor's servant forever..."-High Inquisitor Jerec

"The New Order has never fallen. Only the Emperor."-Grand Moff Ardus Kaine

December 22, 2017, 10:09:39 PMReply #19

Offline Pali

  • Tester
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 790
  • Approval: +39/-2
    • View Profile
Re: The Last Jedi (SPOILERS SPOILERS LOTS OF SPOILERS YOUR FAULT SPOILERS)
« Reply #19 on: December 22, 2017, 10:09:39 PM »
The character change may feel jarring to you, but not to me nor to many others - many of us see it as an understandable development for a character broken by abject failure and consumed by guilt, both of which can cause you to effectively stop acting like the person you were.  I've had experiences in life that have impacted me similarly, and I've had moments where I suddenly had to stop myself and ask "what the fuck am I doing here?!" because I found myself doing something I normally would not, so such happening to Luke didn't phase me - it made him feel more real, which was a major theme of the movie.

Luke was hiding from Vader until Vader provoked him into a rage by threatening to turn Leia, only stopping himself after he cuts off Vader's hand and the Emperor starts encouraging him.  Luke had a vision of the darkness within Ben and all the damage it could cause, and this caused him to think for a moment "I can't let that happen." before he stops himself.  I'm not saying these are identical situations, but if anger could make Luke entertain the notion of killing a family member and actually try to carry it out, why couldn't fear make him entertain it for a second before rejecting it?  Yes, Jacen was doing bad while Ben hadn't yet - which is probably why Jacen Luke fully intended to kill, and Ben Luke held back from killing to give him those chances to turn back.  He never actually tried to kill Ben, he just considered the thought for a moment before rejecting it - and saying a character isn't allowed to even think about doing something before deciding not to is, to me, demanding too much.

The Vong war example is even further removed in the contextual details - my point is just that we have precedence for Luke taking responsibility for the acts of his students and holding back from certain actions out of fear of how things may go wrong because of them.  The difference here is of degree, not type, and it isn't combined with him having lost everything he had worked for.  Had Kyp Durron and Exar Kun destroyed the Jedi temple, slaughtered the rest of the students, and gone on to revitalize the Empire with Luke believing this is all specifically his fault... well, we'll never know.
« Last Edit: December 22, 2017, 10:11:40 PM by Pali »

 

Those working on this mod do so in their own free time and for no pay.
Show your support for them by enabling ads on this site!