Those working on this mod do so in their own free time and for no pay.
Show your support for them by enabling ads on this site!

Author Topic: Pollution and Energy (Split from Obama)  (Read 17037 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

September 07, 2008, 12:56:37 PMReply #40

Offline Corey

  • Mod Leader
  • Administrator
  • Emperor
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,520
  • Approval: +410/-80
  • Dream Crusher
    • View Profile
Re: Pollution and Energy (Split from Obama)
« Reply #40 on: September 07, 2008, 12:56:37 PM »
There.
I also have a YouTube channel where I talk about mod development and gaming, do tutorials, and Let's Plays. If you like the content, consider supporting it on Patreon


September 07, 2008, 02:38:46 PMReply #41

Offline Slornie

  • Mod Team Member
  • Moff
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,759
  • Approval: +54/-13
  • Every Silver Lining has a Cloud
    • View Profile
Re: Pollution and Energy (Split from Obama)
« Reply #41 on: September 07, 2008, 02:38:46 PM »
So, why do they try researching to prevent global warming instead of research for cleaning the pollution.
Because in many cases, the technology for one can be used to combat the other.
Quote from: RonMaverick291 (Gametrailers)
why do u hate america? if it were not for us u guys would be lost. i mean we invented the tv, we invented the internet, cars and we even went to the planet moon. we won all the wars and we always help the little countries who cant fight and we give food to poor people.

September 07, 2008, 02:45:59 PMReply #42

Offline Delta 07

  • Rear Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 154
  • Approval: +6/-20
    • View Profile
Re: Pollution and Energy (Split from Obama)
« Reply #42 on: September 07, 2008, 02:45:59 PM »
Very true Slornie. And how did we get from Obama and McCain, to iraq,to global warming and then pollution in the world?

September 07, 2008, 02:52:58 PMReply #43

Offline vadereclipse

  • Grand Admiral
  • ********
  • Posts: 939
  • Approval: +28/-27
    • View Profile
Re: Pollution and Energy (Split from Obama)
« Reply #43 on: September 07, 2008, 02:52:58 PM »
something about palin and mccain having differing environmental views.
but the new topic is energy.

September 07, 2008, 03:24:32 PMReply #44

Offline siegfried1

  • Rear Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 148
  • Approval: +2/-8
    • View Profile
Re: Pollution and Energy (Split from Obama)
« Reply #44 on: September 07, 2008, 03:24:32 PM »
Yeah, and i'm likin' the possibilites of the vacuum energy theory (near infinite sounds great to me)
But courage which goes against military expediency is stupidity, or, if it is insisted upon by a commander, irresponsibility.
Don't fight a battle if you don't gain anything by winning.
In a man-to-man fight, the winner is he who has one more round in his magazine.
Sweat saves blood.
(Erwin Rommel, the most awesome person to ever live)

September 07, 2008, 06:21:31 PMReply #45

Offline Delta 07

  • Rear Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 154
  • Approval: +6/-20
    • View Profile
Re: Pollution and Energy (Split from Obama)
« Reply #45 on: September 07, 2008, 06:21:31 PM »
never heard of that

September 07, 2008, 07:17:06 PMReply #46

Offline siegfried1

  • Rear Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 148
  • Approval: +2/-8
    • View Profile
Re: Pollution and Energy (Split from Obama)
« Reply #46 on: September 07, 2008, 07:17:06 PM »
It's just in developmeant, but it draws a near infinite amount of power that's drawn from vacuum.  I'm gonna admit i don't understand it entirely, but it sounds promising.
But courage which goes against military expediency is stupidity, or, if it is insisted upon by a commander, irresponsibility.
Don't fight a battle if you don't gain anything by winning.
In a man-to-man fight, the winner is he who has one more round in his magazine.
Sweat saves blood.
(Erwin Rommel, the most awesome person to ever live)

September 07, 2008, 08:12:45 PMReply #47

Offline Delta 07

  • Rear Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 154
  • Approval: +6/-20
    • View Profile
Re: Pollution and Energy (Split from Obama)
« Reply #47 on: September 07, 2008, 08:12:45 PM »
It may sound promising, but it doesnt sound like its going to happen this century. hey, i dont know that though

September 07, 2008, 08:22:11 PMReply #48

Offline siegfried1

  • Rear Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 148
  • Approval: +2/-8
    • View Profile
Re: Pollution and Energy (Split from Obama)
« Reply #48 on: September 07, 2008, 08:22:11 PM »
As i said, it's just in theoretical phase, but they said it's anywhere from 30-40 years off, not that bad.
And i thought it was just something they made up for Stargate!!
But courage which goes against military expediency is stupidity, or, if it is insisted upon by a commander, irresponsibility.
Don't fight a battle if you don't gain anything by winning.
In a man-to-man fight, the winner is he who has one more round in his magazine.
Sweat saves blood.
(Erwin Rommel, the most awesome person to ever live)

September 08, 2008, 08:11:55 PMReply #49

Offline Dane Kiet

  • Vice Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 369
  • Approval: +10/-11
  • victoria est meus
    • View Profile
Re: Pollution and Energy (Split from Obama)
« Reply #49 on: September 08, 2008, 08:11:55 PM »
We should totally do what star trek did and use anti-matter  =D
One choice can change a life..........
One choice can change many lives.........
What's your choice?

September 09, 2008, 12:16:42 PMReply #50

Offline vadereclipse

  • Grand Admiral
  • ********
  • Posts: 939
  • Approval: +28/-27
    • View Profile
Re: Pollution and Energy (Split from Obama)
« Reply #50 on: September 09, 2008, 12:16:42 PM »
We should totally do what star trek did and use anti-matter  =D
except it's the most volatile substance conceivable? and contact with air causes it to combust?

September 09, 2008, 03:00:02 PMReply #51

Offline siegfried1

  • Rear Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 148
  • Approval: +2/-8
    • View Profile
Re: Pollution and Energy (Split from Obama)
« Reply #51 on: September 09, 2008, 03:00:02 PM »
It's hard to make stuff not touch air
But courage which goes against military expediency is stupidity, or, if it is insisted upon by a commander, irresponsibility.
Don't fight a battle if you don't gain anything by winning.
In a man-to-man fight, the winner is he who has one more round in his magazine.
Sweat saves blood.
(Erwin Rommel, the most awesome person to ever live)

 

Those working on this mod do so in their own free time and for no pay.
Show your support for them by enabling ads on this site!