Author Topic: What is your favourite capital ship? (Read 52671 times)

Qui0jinn · « **Reply #80 on:** June 29, 2008, 09:20:33 AM »

Quote from: Meyer on June 29, 2008, 07:00:52 AM

I think that it's hard to compare them to other ships. those EotH ships are made for this mod only and not really canon. you don't see them anywhere else.

Then We will make them canon, cause they are awesome!

Pomerancak · « **Reply #81 on:** June 29, 2008, 02:10:37 PM »

Quote from: Qui0jinn on June 29, 2008, 09:20:33 AM

Then We will make them canon, cause they are awesome!

EXACTLY!

Btw: is it possible that at least some parts of mod became canon? Highly doubt about it, but it would be amazing!

Isamu · « **Reply #82 on:** July 02, 2008, 03:44:26 PM »

Quote from: Meyer on June 27, 2008, 09:28:39 AM

It's dual bridge design is cool. And also the overall shape is great.

personally i thought that the dual bridge design was a horrible idea. it blocks effeciant communication but at the same time they are too close together for 1 to take over if the other was destroyed because it is more likely both would be destroyed

Scarecrow63 · « **Reply #83 on:** July 02, 2008, 09:32:51 PM »

Well, one was the command tower for the hangar if i remember right, so they both serve different purposes

Corey · « **Reply #84 on:** July 02, 2008, 10:04:20 PM »

Quote from: Pomerancak on June 29, 2008, 02:10:37 PM

Quote from: Qui0jinn on June 29, 2008, 09:20:33 AM
Then We will make them canon, cause they are awesome!

EXACTLY!

Btw: is it possible that at least some parts of mod became canon? Highly doubt about it, but it would be amazing!

No, unless an author or official game adopted it. The 501st started as a charity organization that Timothy Zahn included in Survivor's Quest. However, some of our EotH ships DID somehow end up on wikipedia, but I removed them.

Anyways, I like the Providence.

Pomerancak · « **Reply #85 on:** July 03, 2008, 06:52:48 AM »

Zahn invented 501st?

2 topic: Thats always problem putting something in universe when its not bringing any profit. May you should let ur ships on wiki. Could be first illegal step to have some canon Chiss things.

GrndAdmrlPellaeon · « **Reply #86 on:** July 03, 2008, 12:04:58 PM »

First of all Lucasarts and other SW companies would never adopt something into being canon if it wasn't their idea or if they couldn't buy it. Taking something for free has to many possibilities that would make for loss instead of profit. Since the Team cannot sell it, the chance is close to null. Secondly, I think Arbiter doesn't want his stuff on Wiki because he wants to be able to manage where all his info and stuff is, just so he can know where his stuff is. Thirdly, their is no "illegal" canon. If the stuff in question were "illegal" canon it wouldn't be canon, because all canon must be "legal" or it wouldn't be canon; the phrase is an oxymoron.

Pomerancak · « **Reply #87 on:** July 03, 2008, 02:54:20 PM »

Word illegal belonged to process how can(don't take me at word...) TR (or parts of them) became canon. Just became to well-known that everyone would believe its canon. Thru any wiki, wookie etc...

But it was just a joke!

Anyhow it makes me sad when i sometimes see what is allready canon...

Corey · « **Reply #88 on:** July 03, 2008, 03:40:35 PM »

A lot of fanon stuff is in Star Wars. The pilot from Pink Five was in Allegiance, The 501st Legion was named after the charity organization, the Hand of Judgement was a fan suggestion, Piett was only in RotJ because of begging...

Anyways, the mod will never be canon, back on topic.

siegfried1 · « **Reply #89 on:** September 01, 2008, 10:38:15 AM »

I'd go with providence or venator

dreadcall · « **Reply #90 on:** September 01, 2008, 01:23:27 PM »

I'd go with the carrack. Gotta love a light cruiser that can match speed with an X-wing

By the way sry to talk about something so far back in the topic but executor class ships are also capable of atmospheric flight. And they dwarf venators for sure

vadereclipse · « **Reply #91 on:** September 01, 2008, 02:29:26 PM »

Quote from: dreadcall on September 01, 2008, 01:23:27 PM

I'd go with the carrack. Gotta love a light cruiser that can match speed with an X-wing

By the way sry to talk about something so far back in the topic but executor class ships are also capable of atmospheric flight. And they dwarf venators for sure

the lusankya can't fly in an atmosphere horizontally.
it was able to fly out vertically. there is no proof that an executor can fly horizontally.

siegfried1 · « **Reply #92 on:** September 01, 2008, 05:37:52 PM »

But it can fly in atmosphere............ so owned!!!!

Scarecrow63 · « **Reply #93 on:** September 01, 2008, 06:15:32 PM »

It can't fly in atmosphere.....

vadereclipse · « **Reply #94 on:** September 01, 2008, 07:06:53 PM »

Quote from: siegfried1 on September 01, 2008, 05:37:52 PM

But it can fly in atmosphere............ so owned!!!!

not horizontally. it can vertically fly upwards out of the atmospherre.
by that logic, if a SD crashes into a planet, it too can fly in atmospheres.

siegfried1 · « **Reply #95 on:** September 01, 2008, 07:16:03 PM »

Yeah, we agree on something for once vadereclipse.

Slornie · « **Reply #96 on:** September 01, 2008, 07:51:12 PM »

The Lusankya only "flew" in atmosphere with the help of a specially designed lift cradle, which had to be jettisoned for it to operate properly. I wouldnt call that atmospheric flight.

vadereclipse · « **Reply #97 on:** September 01, 2008, 07:54:09 PM »

Quote from: siegfried1 on September 01, 2008, 07:16:03 PM

Yeah, we agree on something for once vadereclipse.

i was saying it can't sustainably fly.
any supership could if you had a cradle, as slornie said.

siegfried1 · « **Reply #98 on:** September 01, 2008, 07:57:11 PM »

that's close enough.

PimpBacca · « **Reply #99 on:** September 02, 2008, 11:33:23 AM »

i all so like the Advanced Star Destroyer and the Pellaeon-class Star Destroyer