Total Members Voted: 15
0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.
and Vader... and Tarkin... And Lemelisk... And Jerec... and Cronal... and....
Tarkin was not evil he was just ruthless since he control sectors with a lot of rebels and Pirates
When you blow up a pacifist planet, you've gone passed ruthless.
So, having issues maintaining order and rule of law makes killing billions of people as a demonstration not evil somehow? Unless those rebels and pirates were killing billions of people (they weren't), I'm going to say they were the lesser evil in this circumstance.
A Planet selling weapons to terrorist and rebel groups
You cant really run your sector and not be ruthless to Criminal and rebel cells, and if you cant maintain order and people are killing each other... Worst a more drastic measurers will be taken against criminals, and Rebel cells.
the more you tighten your grip, the more systems will slip through your fingers
Quote from: rednax on May 31, 2017, 02:02:15 AMWhen you blow up a pacifist planet, you've gone passed ruthless.A Planet selling weapons to terrorist and rebel groups
why do u hate america? if it were not for us u guys would be lost. i mean we invented the tv, we invented the internet, cars and we even went to the planet moon. we won all the wars and we always help the little countries who cant fight and we give food to poor people.
TIL that the US can be blown up because we sell weapons to Terrorists and Rebel cells.
So selling weapons should have the death penalty, both for you and for anyone within a few thousand miles of you?So if a part of a city has a lot of crime, it's okay to just burn down the city with everyone in it, children included? That isn't an evil overreaction in your books, but is instead an understandable and justified act?
1.The entire government was involved and most people supported the actions. The planet was funding extremists groups, and rebel cells alike.
2. Well that is kind of the problem with these rebels, and terrorists they build bases in huge population centers(there are exceptions like hoth and yavin 4 which justifies the force they use since they were remote) to hide them among the people. You can't be sure what to strike at. While maybe bombing rebel bases in population centers isn't really a smart tactic the Empire has explore alternatives, However the rarely work.
btw Did the 1.7 million inhabitants of the Death Star not have backstories, families or children? Is it not possible that they were just doing their jobs whether they agreed with the Empire’s foreign policies or not? In any case they were all wiped out in one genocidal act by Luke to which Han Solo rejoices with the line, ‘Great shot. That was one in a million.’
It is noteable that only Luke and Han are honoured with medals at the end with the rest of the rebels altruistically looking on. No mention of those that actually devised the plan to destroy the Death Star or those that died sacrificing their lives for the rebel cause are mentioned or honored.
War it seems makes for good business.
what about the rebels recruiting terrorists like death watch, pirates, and crime syndicates that murder children everyday.More people die because the vong war had no true huge imperial force and commanders. the rebels fucked it up. How many children die because of the NR actions? answer: more than both planets combined.
As a rule, the Rebellion did not hire the more vicious parts of the underworld - there are a handful of cases of it happening, but the Empire made deals with such as a matter of course (and while high echelons of the military may have disdained the use of bounty hunters, keep in mind that many of those men could just as accurately be called Republic officers, since many likely joined during the Clone Wars, and much of their thinking would still be based on older, honorable standards that predate the Empire). Edit: and it bears repeating that the Empire didn't need to hire outside for its child killing and torture because it was pretty comfortable handling such work itself.The idea that the Empire would have handled the Vong better is, I think, flawed in several ways. First, and most important, is that it didn't survive long enough to face the Vong to begin with, and the fault here lies solely on the Empire's actions - the Rebellion exists in the first place because the Empire made living within it intolerable to enough people that they were willing to Rebel. In short, the Rebellion is the Empire's fault in the first place - it's own flaws are the reason it failed. Second, there is the flaw in Imperial thinking and doctrine that Han Solo points out: the Empire may very well have focused on building the biggest and baddest Vong-killing superweapon, only to have some minor flaw cause it to fail spectacularly and waste all the effort and resources. Third, the NR had the military might to have blunted the Vong invasion, but not the political will or consensus to deploy it effectively or in time. There's an unstated assumption that the Imperial leadership would have been united decisively against the Vong, but the truth is we have no idea how they would have reacted - would the Moff Council have held together, or would it have splintered as Moffs tried to make deals with the Vong to ensure their own survival? What if something went wrong early on, like Palpatine being killed - would the Empire have managed to survive a succession crisis during the Vong invasion? Saying the Empire would have handled it better is pure speculation, and I can easily come up with ways that it may well have handled the Vong invasion worse than the NR did.