Author Topic: Imperial Civil War Wiki Thread (Read 37522 times)

Revanchist · « **Reply #20 on:** January 25, 2017, 06:56:24 PM »

Quote from: DarthRevansRevenge on January 25, 2017, 06:45:07 PM

sorry. that was probably me. i was tired. just for clarity, was it the Imperial Remnant article?

Yes it was. No worries, it was an easy fix, and I am glad the 2.2 additional info was added.

Out of curiosity is there any particular reason you don't have an account? It would be super helpful, especially as I am considering restricting the editing of certain important pages to Users Only.

DarthRevansRevenge · « **Reply #21 on:** January 25, 2017, 07:20:33 PM »

haven't made one. i have only edited 2-3 articles, so i wasn't worried. the account will be made when i actually spend more time editing. i'm just doing a little here and there right now

GreyStar · « **Reply #22 on:** January 25, 2017, 09:22:45 PM »

Thanks for the A-Wing update, finished up the X-Wing page. Should the history be rewritten to be more expansive and should we get rid of the part mentioning why you should not use Corran Horn and Luke in space?

DarthRevansRevenge · « **Reply #23 on:** January 25, 2017, 10:17:02 PM »

alright, have account. you may continue

Revanchist · « **Reply #24 on:** January 26, 2017, 02:42:20 PM »

Quote from: GreyStar on January 25, 2017, 09:22:45 PM

Thanks for the A-Wing update, finished up the X-Wing page. Should the history be rewritten to be more expansive and should we get rid of the part mentioning why you should not use Corran Horn and Luke in space?

Expanding history can always be done as a second pass later on. As for the Corran/Luke part, gat can be mentioned in their articles once we get there, so I think we can get rid of it.

Lord Xizer · « **Reply #25 on:** January 26, 2017, 03:04:05 PM »

I should get in on this for heroes with my expansive lore knowledge

DarthRevansRevenge · « **Reply #26 on:** January 26, 2017, 03:09:30 PM »

thank you. we need all the help we can get. we are trying to get the wiki at least to contain all of 2.1 and what we know of 2.2 before said 2.2 comes out

DarthRevansRevenge · « **Reply #27 on:** January 26, 2017, 03:45:04 PM »

by the way, can someone update the Imperial Civil War page to contain all the rest of the new stuff? i don't have time to do it all

GreyStar · « **Reply #28 on:** January 30, 2017, 02:30:52 PM »

I don't really care about the 2.2 stuff until it comes out. I'm just focused on writing out the NR's faction and their gameplay. While the 2.2 notes are nice, they will end up removed anyhow.

DarthRevansRevenge · « **Reply #29 on:** January 30, 2017, 04:24:53 PM »

why remove it? what's wrong with including the notes containing 2.2 material

GreyStar · « **Reply #30 on:** January 30, 2017, 09:41:15 PM »

They'll be removed and the Era decripistions will instead be 2.2 stuff instead of 2.1 stuff.

kucsidave · « **Reply #31 on:** January 31, 2017, 05:49:15 AM »

Quote from: DarthRevansRevenge on January 30, 2017, 04:24:53 PM

why remove it? what's wrong with including the notes containing 2.2 material

the stuff you know about the 2.2 content might be wrong or change by the time of the full release, and might become inaccurate. It might also make people look for a content that does not exist

GreyStar · « **Reply #32 on:** February 01, 2017, 01:46:24 PM »

Shouldn't we delete the redundant X-Wing page we have?

Revanchist · « **Reply #33 on:** February 01, 2017, 03:00:52 PM »

Quote from: GreyStar on February 01, 2017, 01:46:24 PM

Shouldn't we delete the redundant X-Wing page we have?

Done

Also I was looking at the page on the B-wing at it says that the IR counterpart is the TIE Defender. This was true in vanilla FoC, but could not be farther from the truth in the case of ICW. If anyone wants to correct that at the moment that's great (away from a computer atm). If not, I will be bringing it up to standards this week hopefully.

GreyStar · « **Reply #34 on:** February 01, 2017, 03:49:46 PM »

In terms of weaponry and design the TIE Defender and B-Wing are the same in terms of concepts, just the Defender is better in every regard.

Revanchist · « **Reply #35 on:** February 01, 2017, 04:11:49 PM »

Quote from: GreyStar on February 01, 2017, 03:49:46 PM

In terms of weaponry and design the TIE Defender and B-Wing are the same in terms of concepts, just the Defender is better in every regard.

Weaponry is about all they got going for them. They were designed for completely different roles. The B-wing was meant to be a replacement for the Y-wing, a bomber which could also pass as a heavy fighter in a pinch. The Defender was meant to be the pinnacle of fighters: fast, maneuverable, and just better at everything fighters could do, with some ordnance tacked on for good measure.

DarthRevansRevenge · « **Reply #36 on:** February 02, 2017, 07:18:21 PM »

while the merger of posts is fine, we need to make sure all the links lead to the right tabs. i clicked the X-Wing link, and it lead me to the extraneous page, which, not knowing it at the time, i proceded to edit. i'm just saying, i don't want to make that mistake again, or have someone else do likewise

Revanchist · « **Reply #37 on:** February 02, 2017, 08:25:17 PM »

Quote from: DarthRevansRevenge on February 02, 2017, 07:18:21 PM

while the merger of posts is fine, we need to make sure all the links lead to the right tabs. i clicked the X-Wing link, and it lead me to the extraneous page, which, not knowing it at the time, i proceded to edit. i'm just saying, i don't want to make that mistake again, or have someone else do likewise

The page should be gone gone now. If you find it again let me know and I'll hit it over the head with the Delete Bat again.

GreyStar · « **Reply #38 on:** February 02, 2017, 10:25:49 PM »

Since Monday - Wesndsy - Friday are the days I have 2.5 hours to myself, I'll try working on the NR page and making sure all the links work, and everything links back apporiatley.

DarthRevansRevenge · « **Reply #39 on:** February 03, 2017, 09:08:56 PM »

good. i don't want to make that mistake and get yelled at again