Author Topic: Floating Fortress? (Read 13943 times)

Slornie · « **on:** October 08, 2007, 07:03:56 PM »

How about the HAVr A9 Floating Fortress for the Empire? http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Floating_Fortress

Would be another unit unique to TR (i havent seen it in any other mods, either released or in development). Would be an alternative to the AT-AT or Juggernaught.

Corey · « **Reply #1 on:** October 08, 2007, 07:06:03 PM »

Yes, we plan to have that in in the role of a transport.

Meyer · « **Reply #2 on:** October 09, 2007, 12:24:51 AM »

nice. great thing that you take many ships and vessels to this mod.

sarcronis · « **Reply #3 on:** October 09, 2007, 09:32:01 PM »

Sweet idea. Although I came up with this as an idea for remnants of the past yesterday. Weird...

STORM GENERAL · « **Reply #4 on:** October 10, 2007, 04:58:37 PM »

Yeah, that is weird but anyway it'll be useful as a transport.

Corey · « **Reply #5 on:** October 10, 2007, 05:10:19 PM »

It will also be one of the vehicles that serve as mobile RPs, for those who were here long enough to have read that update....

Slornie · « **Reply #6 on:** October 11, 2007, 04:50:07 AM »

I think i vaguely remember something about them

vadereclipse · « **Reply #7 on:** October 18, 2007, 05:49:51 PM »

i like idea of floating fortress but it would be hard to model by the looks of it

Slornie · « **Reply #8 on:** October 18, 2007, 06:01:07 PM »

By the way, which release(s) are you intending on including this in?

Meyer · « **Reply #9 on:** October 19, 2007, 02:35:20 AM »

do they have some sort of weaponary?

Slornie · « **Reply #10 on:** October 19, 2007, 08:35:23 AM »

Two top-mounted turreted heavy blaster cannons.

Meyer · « **Reply #11 on:** October 19, 2007, 09:04:03 AM »

nice. that should be effective enough.

Slornie · « **Reply #12 on:** October 19, 2007, 11:33:31 AM »

And its a hell of a lot faster than an AT-AT and isnt susceptible to being tripped up

Meyer · « **Reply #13 on:** October 19, 2007, 12:04:33 PM »

and it can transport troops inside it.

Slornie · « **Reply #14 on:** October 19, 2007, 12:37:58 PM »

Only 10 men though, whats that compared with an AT-AT?

Meyer · « **Reply #15 on:** October 19, 2007, 01:35:31 PM »

AT-AT transports 40 men if I remember right.

vadereclipse · « **Reply #16 on:** October 19, 2007, 01:47:55 PM »

and were able to pack a speeder bike squadron

Corey · « **Reply #17 on:** October 19, 2007, 03:19:32 PM »

The thing is, you had to actually be able to get into an AT-AT. Kinda hard once it is alr=eady deployed.

vadereclipse · « **Reply #18 on:** October 19, 2007, 03:52:48 PM »

wasnt the floating fortress a modified repulsorlift AT-AT?

Corey · « **Reply #19 on:** October 19, 2007, 03:53:38 PM »

Nope. It was completely different.