Author Topic: 2.1 and You (Read 101061 times)

Lord Xizer · « **Reply #160 on:** June 27, 2013, 08:20:53 PM »

Quote from: SettraTheImperishable on June 27, 2013, 08:45:30 AM

I was speaking to this (from the "modularr components section" of the wiki):
"Providence-class ships featured modular compartments which made the vessels very easy to modify. This made it possible to easily upgrade the propulsion systems or weaponry of a given ship, as well as making it possible to convert the ships into starfighter carriers, or other variations. The Invisible Hand was one example of a heavily modified Providence-class ship"

It is known

Crisiss · « **Reply #161 on:** June 27, 2013, 08:25:37 PM »

Quote from: Lord Xizer on June 27, 2013, 08:20:53 PM

It is known

Yeah I thought that would be fairly obvious... I don't need a Wookieepedia article to know that they were highly modifiable and commonly modified. There's already a handful of examples. I'm still curious to see the TR team's plans for the Providence.

Settra · « **Reply #162 on:** June 27, 2013, 10:20:20 PM »

Quote from: Crisiss on June 27, 2013, 08:25:37 PM

Yeah I thought that would be fairly obvious... I don't need a Wookieepedia article to know that they were highly modifiable and commonly modified. There's already a handful of examples. I'm still curious to see the TR team's plans for the Providence.

Wat.

We have the same question, you said they "were all destroyer/carrier variants" when this wiki that is "fairly obvious" said that "making it possible to convert the ships into starfighter carriers, or other variations". I had never said it was a different model, so when we want the same thing, I am not sure why you were trying to correct me.

Lord Xizer · « **Reply #163 on:** June 28, 2013, 06:06:16 PM »

Probably just miscommunication

Crisiss · « **Reply #164 on:** July 01, 2013, 02:57:57 PM »

Quote from: SettraTheImperishable on June 27, 2013, 10:20:20 PM

Wat.

We have the same question, you said they "were all destroyer/carrier variants" when this wiki that is "fairly obvious" said that "making it possible to convert the ships into starfighter carriers, or other variations". I had never said it was a different model, so when we want the same thing, I am not sure why you were trying to correct me.

I'm confused with your statement. I didn't correct you (or at least I don't think I was, just ignore me if that's the case) Im not really looking to start any arguments. Just looking for how the Providence will turn out in 2.1. I apologize for any inconviences.

Settra · « **Reply #165 on:** July 01, 2013, 03:14:48 PM »

Quote from: Crisiss on July 01, 2013, 02:57:57 PM

I'm confused with your statement. I didn't correct you (or at least I don't think I was, just ignore me if that's the case) Im not really looking to start any arguments. Just looking for how the Providence will turn out in 2.1. I apologize for any inconviences.

lol at communication issues, brainfarts all around. Though yeah, definitely interested in the Providence will be since they dumped the Recusant for it (and it is a good bit more powerful than it) I'm hoping for another bruiser for the PA.

Crisiss · « **Reply #166 on:** July 01, 2013, 03:42:31 PM »

Quote from: SettraTheImperishable on July 01, 2013, 03:14:48 PM

lol at communication issues, brainfarts all around. Though yeah, definitely interested in the Providence will be since they dumped the Recusant for it (and it is a good bit more powerful than it) I'm hoping for another bruiser for the PA.

They don't have any very fast heavy hitters. But then again there isn't much left in the notion of (for lack of better wording) newness. NR has their focus on starfighters, the IR in heavy hitters, and the EotH is a breed of the two plus hit and run abilities. Not much left for them. I think making them more fortification based (seeing as they weren't an expansionist faction, just maintaining what they own) would be something new. But seeing as beta testing has already started and this is likely the last major update for Thrawn's Revenge, they're probably stuck as an IR/NR mix. Disappointing as they don't add anything new to the available faction pool.

Lord Xizer · « **Reply #167 on:** July 01, 2013, 04:03:48 PM »

Well the PA is a compromise between NR and IR ideology. Heavy cap ships and fighter spamming carriers

tlmiller · « **Reply #168 on:** July 01, 2013, 04:11:07 PM »

With the Lucrehulk, REALLY BIG carriers.

Clubby71 · « **Reply #169 on:** July 07, 2013, 02:32:46 PM »

Quote from: Lord Xizer on July 01, 2013, 04:03:48 PM

Well the PA is a compromise between NR and IR ideology. Heavy cap ships and fighter spamming carriers

But in the end isn't the PA and IR the same ships? the same ships that make the PA unique eras 1-3 are used by the IR 4-5, except for the munificent and the escort carrier.

Lord Xizer · « **Reply #170 on:** July 07, 2013, 06:09:36 PM »

Quote from: Clubby71 on July 07, 2013, 02:32:46 PM

But in the end isn't the PA and IR the same ships? the same ships that make the PA unique eras 1-3 are used by the IR 4-5, except for the munificent and the escort carrier.

Not true, the PA has a multitude of unique units
PA gets:

Ground/ Dark Jedi, Hailfires, Enforcers, Storm Commandos, Floating fortress, republic Hover tank, and Clone drop ship

Space/IPVs, Lucrehulk, TIE Hunters, Praetor(which IR only gets in era 3) Providence, Regicide, V-19, Vengeance, Muunifient, Escort carrier, and the Enforcer

Clubby71 · « **Reply #171 on:** July 09, 2013, 01:41:10 PM »

Quote from: Lord Xizer on July 07, 2013, 06:09:36 PM

Not true, the PA has a multitude of unique units
PA gets:

Ground/ Dark Jedi, Hailfires, Enforcers, Storm Commandos, Floating fortress, republic Hover tank, and Clone drop ship

Space/IPVs, Lucrehulk, TIE Hunters, Praetor(which IR only gets in era 3) Providence, Regicide, V-19, Vengeance, Muunifient, Escort carrier, and the Enforcer

Lucrehulk, is that even in game? I never saw one.

Crisiss · « **Reply #172 on:** July 09, 2013, 01:51:11 PM »

Quote from: Clubby71 on July 09, 2013, 01:41:10 PM

Lucrehulk, is that even in game? I never saw one.

Re: 2.1 and you. This is a thread discussing what will be appearing in 2.1. So no, not in game yet.

Slornie · « **Reply #173 on:** July 09, 2013, 02:07:12 PM »

Quote from: Crisiss on July 09, 2013, 01:51:11 PM

Re: 2.1 and you. This is a thread discussing what will be appearing in 2.1. So no, not in game yet.

Well, technically it is in game, you just can't have it yet.

Singularity · « **Reply #174 on:** July 09, 2013, 02:42:57 PM »

Quote from: Clubby71 on July 09, 2013, 01:41:10 PM

Lucrehulk, is that even in game? I never saw one.

They don't have an icon, so they're basically invisible on the galaxy map.

Clubby71 · « **Reply #175 on:** July 09, 2013, 03:41:31 PM »

Quote from: Crisiss on July 09, 2013, 01:51:11 PM

Re: 2.1 and you. This is a thread discussing what will be appearing in 2.1. So no, not in game yet.

Well the list was mostly already in game, so I thought he was talking about current game.

Chimera2010 · « **Reply #176 on:** August 10, 2013, 12:22:06 PM »

Is there a way to edit the clawcraft squadron out of the game? For some reason they slow down the gameplay considerably on my computer.

Lord Xizer · « **Reply #177 on:** August 10, 2013, 04:22:02 PM »

Quote from: Chimera2010 on August 10, 2013, 12:22:06 PM

Is there a way to edit the clawcraft squadron out of the game? For some reason they slow down the gameplay considerably on my computer.

As I remember it's because they are very high detailed compared to other fighters(part of the reason for the new Fighter stagger is to prevent this from being an issue)

Corey · « **Reply #178 on:** August 10, 2013, 09:15:58 PM »

Yeah their poly count is way too high for several people's comps to handle. We're remaking it.

Lord Xizer · « **Reply #179 on:** August 10, 2013, 10:22:25 PM »

Quote from: Corey on August 10, 2013, 09:15:58 PM

Yeah their poly count is way too high for several people's comps to handle. We're remaking it.

Yeah 2 D Clawcraft!