1
Star Wars Discussion / TIE FIghter - short film
« on: March 24, 2015, 05:34:24 PM »
Neat little animation you might want to check out!
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
News & Updates / Re: 0.95 Overview
« on: February 22, 2015, 03:48:13 PM »
I'm interested in these IR changes, do they take a departure from how you have been doing IR? But that question will certainly be answered when the IR changes become relevant. I'm also curious how you'll model the Proficient since, to my knowledge, doesn't have a canon model.
3
News & Updates / Re: The End of the Beginning
« on: January 27, 2015, 02:34:31 AM »
Now I may be misunderstanding or may have missed it stated otherwise, but are the Ssi-Ruuvi up for potential full faction status? If so would it a spot competition between them and the Hapans (assuming the Armada III team 5 faction is the limit)? They certainly have some very interesting ideas to build upon, though this is of course assuming real life doesn't intervene. If there is spot competition I'd imagine it should go to the Ssi-Ruuvi, as I at least cannot see how to make the Hapans more interesting gameplaywise as compared to them, though I may just lack the creativity.
4
News & Updates / Re: The End of the Beginning
« on: January 21, 2015, 12:29:36 AM »
So how into giving the Hapans a EoTH treatment is the team?
5
News & Updates / Re: The End of the Beginning
« on: January 19, 2015, 10:34:53 PM »
Oh baby potential playable Hapans
6
The Lounge / Re: Anime
« on: September 08, 2014, 09:52:10 PM »
Oh Shii- Anime thread
Favorites:
Evangelion
Code Geass
Most Gundam series
Elfen Lied
Also currently enjoying Durarara and Aldnoah Zero
Favorites:
Evangelion
Code Geass
Most Gundam series
Elfen Lied
Also currently enjoying Durarara and Aldnoah Zero
7
News & Updates / Re: What You Can Do in 2.2
« on: August 16, 2014, 12:18:24 AM »OK, makes more sense then where the 8/31 came from...
Ah ha! It sure does.
8
News & Updates / Re: What You Can Do in 2.2
« on: August 16, 2014, 12:03:31 AM »Right now the focus is presumably on Ascendancy (with a target date of Aug. 31 for a full release).
lol wat, nobody has mentioned a deadline, ever.
9
Ascendancy Discussion / Re: Ascendancy Daily Screenshot Thread
« on: July 21, 2014, 03:26:35 PM »Preparing the Empire of the Hand for the testers
My body is ready
11
Welcome to the Boards / Re: Hello
« on: June 26, 2014, 09:34:47 PM »We appreciate it. Also we needed more EotH avatars around here.
EoTH master race. Also hello!
12
Ascendancy Discussion / Re: Ascendancy Daily Screenshot Thread
« on: June 23, 2014, 03:14:33 PM »
Nice looking Battle Dragon line. PewPewPew
13
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: Diplomacy for ICW
« on: June 21, 2014, 01:08:01 PM »
Just tried to download it (assuming it's the second download link) and it doesn't seem to want to open.
14
Ascendancy Discussion / Re: Ascendancy Daily Screenshot Thread
« on: June 16, 2014, 05:29:00 PM »
lol Teradoc.
15
Ascendancy Discussion / Re: Ascendancy Daily Screenshot Thread
« on: June 16, 2014, 12:46:18 AM »
pewpewpew.
I like the more sleek look to the Strike, nice improvement.
I like the more sleek look to the Strike, nice improvement.
16
Ascendancy Discussion / Re: Sins of a Surveyed Community
« on: May 28, 2014, 12:48:22 PM »
1. The culture system and something other than firepower playing into the combat system are my two favorite aspects.
2. The inability to specialize planets was a bit of a bummer for me (build a station and the planet gains more tactical/ logistic slots or trade/production/population while losing some of the opposite.
3. Well I love the fact that they exist and the fact that they are sizable, but it is a shame that they are more or less rehashes of the other factions techs.
4. Honestly, the tech trees themselves seem to be underdeveloped and could have had potential to either be longer or more diverse for each faction.
5. Since I'm not too familiar with the limitations of the game this may not be possible to the extent of which I'd like, but I think the game should have more options (which then gain restrictions) about how one uses their planets.
2. The inability to specialize planets was a bit of a bummer for me (build a station and the planet gains more tactical/ logistic slots or trade/production/population while losing some of the opposite.
3. Well I love the fact that they exist and the fact that they are sizable, but it is a shame that they are more or less rehashes of the other factions techs.
4. Honestly, the tech trees themselves seem to be underdeveloped and could have had potential to either be longer or more diverse for each faction.
5. Since I'm not too familiar with the limitations of the game this may not be possible to the extent of which I'd like, but I think the game should have more options (which then gain restrictions) about how one uses their planets.
17
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: Diplomacy for ICW
« on: May 26, 2014, 04:42:14 PM »
I've installed it. I count for something! (I'll do some more once my company leaves).
18
Ascendancy Discussion / Re: Ascendancy Daily Screenshot Thread
« on: May 20, 2014, 10:53:51 PM »
I'll be really interested to see how exactly you all implement Waffle Wagon's idea within the game limitations.
19
Ascendancy Discussion / Re: Ascendancy Daily Screenshot Thread
« on: May 20, 2014, 02:13:55 PM »I like the look of these are they going to be fighter deploying station like the Empire of the hands level 1 defense platforms or will they be more like the Golan?
That is actually the Naval Station, used to designate which planets are to be "fortress worlds".
20
News & Updates / Re: Empire of the Hand Unit List
« on: May 12, 2014, 10:21:37 PM »
I was curious if there's room for another defensive station for the EoTH. A consideration I had was a form of support station that enhances performance of the other two stations (increase fighter production/ fire rate).