Those working on this mod do so in their own free time and for no pay.
Show your support for them by enabling ads on this site!

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Bucman55

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 ... 10
1
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: Where to find fighter spawns for ships in the files?
« on: March 13, 2019, 04:17:42 PM »
Quote from: Vlado87 on March 13, 2019, 03:15:02 PM
I am still can not find it GameObjectLibrary.lua, is it hidden file 
Should be exactly where Jorrit said it is. It's not hidden or anything.

2
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: Different Starfighters for Imperial factions
« on: February 19, 2019, 12:16:32 PM »
There's already several different fighters for some of the Warlords and more are coming in 2.3. Pentastar gets the V-19 Torrent, Maldrood gets the TIE Avenger and ARC-170, and Eriadu gets a shielded TIE Interceptor. In 2.3, they're adding the TIE Punisher to Eriadu, but I'm not sure if they're adding other fighters to the other warlords for that release. I know Corey has said that eventually they'd like to get some different fighters like XG-1s in for some of the Warlords.

3
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: Hapes cluster
« on: November 16, 2018, 11:48:41 PM »
I'm pretty sure the Hapes Consortium is still planned for 2.4+

4
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: Eriadu Authority Capital Shipyards Problem?
« on: September 23, 2018, 08:29:51 PM »
The space unit filters are new to 2.2.

5
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: Ranking the ISD II's
« on: September 03, 2018, 01:39:55 PM »
PA ISDs don't carry V-19s, that's only their Acclamators, Venators and Secutors. PA ISDs carry 1/1 TIE Fighters, 1/1 TIE Bombers and 2/0 TIE Interceptors.

6
News & Updates / Re: [Patch] Imperial Civil War 2.2.2 Released
« on: April 28, 2018, 11:23:14 AM »
Quote from: ImpLicht on April 28, 2018, 06:33:48 AM
Outstanding work, thank you very much! Am I correct that patch 2.2.2 still isn´t released at moddb? At least I wasn´t able to find it.

Correct, ModDB won't get an update until 2.2.5.

7
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: Stormtroopers or Army Troopers?
« on: April 25, 2018, 02:46:12 PM »
I prefer to use the Enforcer Troopers (PA's Army Troopers) as defensive units, they have more health than stormies and since they're on defense firing on the move doesn't really matter much.

Quote from: Grand Admiral Rufaan Tigellinus on April 25, 2018, 10:25:39 AM
Having said that, I'm yet to play as Zsinj or the Pentastar Alignment in 2.2, and they have AT-TEs now instead of AT-ATs, which means no free infantry. So I guess that changes things a bit for these two factions. I'd go for Stormtroopers over Army Troopers then. However, Zsinj has Raptor Troops, and PA has Storm Commandos and stuff, so there are different choices to make. All of them have their strengths and weaknesses, I'd assume.

PA does not have Storm Commandos.

8
Imperial Civil War Tech Support / Re: Imperial Civil War 2.2 Known Issue and Bug Report Thread
« on: April 21, 2018, 04:32:41 AM »
GC: From the Ground Up
Faction: New Republic
Era: 5
Description: Successfully boarding the last of one of the hostile factions vessels and capturing it will cause the battle to not end unless a retreat is ordered, which depending on the state of the captured vessel would mean losing it.

GC: From the Ground Up
Faction: New Republic
Era: 5
Description: Nearly every capturable object on New Alderaan starts under New Republic control. There are also Imperial aligned AT-STs 2-M tanks just hanging around.

9
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: Modding Fighter Loadout
« on: April 14, 2018, 01:00:43 AM »
The scripts you're looking for are in the config.meg file. You'll need the megeditor to access them.

10
Discussion, Suggestions and Feedback / Re: Separatist holdouts
« on: April 10, 2018, 12:34:57 AM »
I'm not opposed to the idea of a post-clone wars GC in general (just look at my mod), but in a mod called "Fall of the Republic", why involve something that doesn't involve the Republic?

Edit: Also Corey has stated FoTR will not go past the Mission to Mustafar.

11
Discussion, Suggestions and Feedback / Re: Separatist holdouts
« on: April 09, 2018, 11:37:43 PM »
Fall of the Republic will not proceed past the Mission to Mustafar.

No young Empire

No Separatist Holdouts

12
News & Updates / Re: Slight Delay
« on: March 29, 2018, 01:07:02 AM »
Quote from: Governor Colex on March 28, 2018, 05:23:02 PM
Shoot. What happens if you get it confirmed fixed before that date?

If they manage to find a fix they'll likely keep the date as April 12th, they'll just be able to polish the mod a bit more.

13
Ascendancy Discussion / Re: PentaStar Carrier
« on: March 27, 2018, 10:18:11 PM »
The Acclamator, Venator, Lucrehulk and Secutor all serve as carriers for the PA.

14
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: Making Leader ships more manageable?
« on: March 24, 2018, 05:31:21 PM »
In 2.2, the PA no longer gets two free SSDs from the start. Kaine shows up at around week 20 and Jerec has been separated from the Vengeance. Captain Sysco is now in command of the Vengeance and is a recruitable hero for them. SSDs in general have also been adjusted. They are significantly more vulnerable to fighters and bombers in 2.2 than in 2.15. They also have received engine hardpoints so you can prevent them from retreating.

Picking your ships starting positions isn't possible.

When on offense, pathfinder slot. Use it. Makes things much better. Can't really do anything about that on defense.

As a side note, this should probably be moved to the Imperial Civil War section as opposed to the Fall of the Republic section. Moved ~ Slornie

15
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: Uglies
« on: March 21, 2018, 12:40:07 PM »
Most uglies would make no sense from either a gameplay perspective or a lore perspective. The only uglies that could fit would be the Clutch Uglies for Maldrood.
Shielded TIE Interceptors are present for Eriadu and possibly Era 2 Remnant.

16
Star Wars Discussion / Re: Character Study Carnor Jax
« on: March 19, 2018, 12:58:51 AM »
Do you think that's one of the scenarios you'll explore in the submod you're working on?

17
Star Wars Discussion / Re: Greater maldrood
« on: March 16, 2018, 01:26:51 AM »
Quote from: Lord Xizer on March 15, 2018, 09:58:57 PM
To the best of my knowledge they don't.

Yeah. I think the PA is the only warlord faction with a canon (legends) insignia.

EDIT: Nevermind, the Restored Empire has a distinct insignia as well.

18
News & Updates / Re: [ICW] Testing Process & Release Date
« on: February 02, 2018, 01:48:34 PM »
Quote from: StarBornMichaelh165 on February 02, 2018, 12:58:42 PM
So just what is about Thursday that good for Release dates. Oh and when can we Admirals Start Playing the Beta to start Testing?

Did you read the actual news post? It's there in big bold letters.

February 15th

19
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: Building Fighters is kind of useless don't you think?
« on: January 26, 2018, 05:28:07 PM »
Quote from: Rogue66X on January 26, 2018, 04:54:52 PM
Surely in era 5 they started adding a few defenders to star destroyers and few others

By Era 5 the Remnant had pretty much run out of TIE Fighter production facilities which is why they began relying on Preybirds and I-7 Howlrunners. If they were so depleted of TIE Fighters they couldn't garrison most of their ISDs with them, there's no way they would have been able to garrison even a small fleet with TIE Defenders.

20
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: Mercenaries
« on: January 22, 2018, 02:11:59 PM »
I agree with Ordo, Why? This seems like adding units for the sake of adding units.

P.S. Mercenaries don't make a mod good or bad.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 ... 10
Those working on this mod do so in their own free time and for no pay.
Show your support for them by enabling ads on this site!