Thrawn's Revenge

Imperial Civil War [Empire at War] => Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback => Topic started by: CBTS Demon on February 27, 2007, 07:14:49 PM

Title: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: CBTS Demon on February 27, 2007, 07:14:49 PM
Can you guys make the SSD be a unit you can make multiples of? That would be sweet. ;D
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Corey on February 27, 2007, 07:50:11 PM
I'm assuming you mean the Executor class by SSD? If so, yes, you can build more than one, but they will be very expensive, and take quite a bit of time to build.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: CBTS Demon on February 27, 2007, 08:03:26 PM
I can live with that ;D
Anything to get rid of that rebel scum :angel:
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on February 28, 2007, 05:13:35 AM
But I hope they are worth the cost. In FOC Vader in Executor is quite weak.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: insanegolfer on February 28, 2007, 07:59:06 AM
The Executor class SSD was about 8 times bigger than the Imperial class SD.  It makes sense then for it to be a lot more expensive and take a lot longer.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on February 28, 2007, 02:02:21 PM
Executor-class SSD was 19km long.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Corey on February 28, 2007, 03:11:11 PM
We are going for the 11 times longer than an ISD, with the Eclipse slightly shorter than that. I made a scaling guide to Thrawn's Revenge a while back, I'll update it a bit then post it.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: SCPX on March 01, 2007, 12:22:01 PM
Will it be more expensive than a Death Star? I played a mod that did that, and thought it was stupid...

Will there only be the Executor-Class SSD? Or will you include the Eclipse-Class SSD?

Will the Rebels (or other factions) get Super Star Destroyers?
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Corey on March 01, 2007, 03:12:47 PM
1. No, that would make absolutely no sense.

2. There will be more than one multi-km warship for the Imperial Remnant, though the Empire will just have Executors.

3. Multi-km warships? Most likely, not the Rebels though. Executors? hehe  8)
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Noret on April 19, 2007, 04:58:15 PM
well the rebels did inheart a couple of ssds didnt they?
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Corey on April 19, 2007, 05:01:07 PM
Nope.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Slornie on April 20, 2007, 03:48:47 AM
they captured one or two i think - the Lusankya and another one that was scrapped
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on April 20, 2007, 05:03:46 AM
Guardian SSD
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Slornie on April 20, 2007, 06:17:22 AM
wasnt the Guardian an Imperial Remnant SSD ?
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on April 20, 2007, 07:11:09 AM
Rebels captured it after the battle of Tantive V. Guardian fought against Pellaeon in 18 ABY as a flagship of Ackbar.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Corey on April 20, 2007, 03:19:41 PM
The Lusankya was captured by the New republic, not the Rebellion. Same with the Guardian.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Noret on April 20, 2007, 04:50:23 PM
thats what i meant sorry :-\
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on April 21, 2007, 02:24:20 AM
Yeah I'm sorry too. I should have remembered they were captured by the "New Republic" A.K.A. REBEL SCUMS
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Slornie on April 21, 2007, 04:38:08 AM
Rebel Alliance, New Republic - big difference :P
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on April 21, 2007, 07:24:54 AM
New Republic was illegal goverment that overthrew the legal one, I remind you all.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Zeron on April 21, 2007, 12:22:04 PM
So was the United States throwing off Britain's colonial rule if i remember.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on April 21, 2007, 12:44:59 PM
I don't think you can compare these incidents. England had conguered US, who wanted to become independent like Finland. But Empire didn't have to conguer anything. Palpatine had been elected, by the Senate, to become an emperor for life.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: CBTS Demon on April 21, 2007, 12:51:42 PM
so was the king of britain (kinda)
there are a lot of similarities
new republic eventually falls altogether and the USA ain't looking so good
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Noret on April 21, 2007, 01:10:50 PM
i give it about 50 years  :o :o

So was the United States throwing off Britain's colonial rule if i remember.
ithought the exact same thing
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: CBTS Demon on April 21, 2007, 01:18:12 PM
If Hilary Clinton gets presidency, we won't last 2 1/2 years :'(
Seriously, if our presidents keep wasting resources on pointless wars we can't win, then other nations will take advantage and Armageddon will be upon us Americans.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Noret on April 21, 2007, 01:30:28 PM
if Hilary wins we may have another civil war let alone a foreign war
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on April 21, 2007, 01:59:04 PM
I don't want to insult anyone here but I say that if USA keeps acting like World Police they should be teached if not destroy.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: SCPX on April 21, 2007, 02:15:15 PM
Oy, a lot of anti-American feelings here. Perhaps I should leave...
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: insanegolfer on April 21, 2007, 02:48:18 PM
Lets keep the discussion in context.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on April 21, 2007, 03:57:07 PM
You're right. Lets talk about Super Star Destroyers.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Noret on April 21, 2007, 07:15:03 PM
right then, does anybody the exact number that were produced
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on April 22, 2007, 02:36:49 AM
It depend on what class are we talking about.
13 Executor-class SSDs were built: Executor, Lusankya, Aggressor, Annihilator, Guardian, Intimidator, Knight Hammer, Iron Fist, Reaper, Terror, Vengeance, Razor's Kiss, Crimson Blade
2 Eclipse-class SSDs: Eclipse and Eclipse II
4 Sovereign-class SSDs: Sovereign, Autarch, Despot, Heresiarch

These are mentioned on wookiepedia. But it says that none of the Sovereign-class ships were completed.
So that would give us 15 SSDs completed.

Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Noret on April 22, 2007, 09:58:23 AM
thank you thats what i wanted to know :)(thats a lot more than i thought i figured was about 5)
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: SCPX on April 22, 2007, 05:59:00 PM
Yeah, considering how little work had been done in the way of SSDs, there sure were a lot. Must be due to Kuat Ship Yards capability...
The problem is that each one, while built the same, had something unusual about them. For instance, the Knight Hammer had cloaking capability while the Lusankya had part of Coruscant built on it.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on April 23, 2007, 06:34:19 AM
What do you mean by saying that Lusankya had part of Imperial Center built on it?
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: insanegolfer on April 23, 2007, 09:27:17 AM
What he means is that the Lusankya was buried in Coruscant back when the Emperor was in control.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Slornie on April 23, 2007, 11:23:04 AM
but the real question about that is how did he keep it secret when it was buried ? - did he use the force to erase any memories of it - or did he slaughter millions of people ?

and i never realised there were 4 Sovereign class SSDs built - i thought there was just the Sovereign
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on April 23, 2007, 11:42:48 AM
none of the Sovereign-class SSDs were completed.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Slornie on April 23, 2007, 12:40:26 PM
sorry - i didnt realise there were 4 of them (built or otherwise)
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: insanegolfer on April 23, 2007, 01:11:30 PM
In the X-Wing books, it was thought that he used the Force to erase the memories of all the people that the construction displaced.  Another of the theories was that the Lusankya was only partially built when buried and finished underground.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: SCPX on April 23, 2007, 03:10:17 PM
Personnally, it would be just like the Emperor to kill all who saw it. He'd see no problems with murdering millions. Especially on Coruscant, where that many can just disappear and no one would notice...
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on April 24, 2007, 02:13:51 AM
It is in his (Palpatines) character to kill those people.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Slornie on April 24, 2007, 03:44:05 AM
but i would have thought that by that time Luke would be strong enough in the Force to feel so many deaths
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: SCPX on April 24, 2007, 03:44:45 PM
He might have, but if he was not trained in that way, he would not know if it was just him feeling nasueous or something...
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on April 25, 2007, 06:40:49 AM
Lusankya was completed 1 ABY 2 years before Luke met Yoda. I think he wouldn't have fel it throught the Force if Palpatine killed those people. And he didn't have to kill them all at the same time.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Slornie on April 25, 2007, 11:19:27 AM
oh yeah - i always forget that there is a time gap between the films - and i suppose the number of people that Palpatine had to kill would be less than those killed when Alderaan was destroyed, making it less likely that he would have been able to sense it through the Force, even with training
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: SCPX on April 25, 2007, 03:29:45 PM
That, plus anyone who's lived on Coruscant long enough would know not to talk about what they just saw...
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Wal-Mart Shoplifter on April 25, 2007, 05:52:38 PM
Yeah...I can't see Palpatine really killing that many people by himself. He was always one for manipulation...Always had his to lackeys do is bidding for him.

"I couldn't see more then 3 Super Star Destroyers for the Empire...Thinking as if you wanted to use them all on one map..it would be horrid just thought of how far spread they would be...kinda like many other mods where things would be off screen."
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on April 26, 2007, 03:00:07 AM
Maybe all the workers who buried Lusankya were killed by accidents like shuttle crash or something
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Wal-Mart Shoplifter on April 26, 2007, 09:36:25 AM
Yeah..Kinda like former Chancellor Valorum dun dun dunned.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: SCPX on April 26, 2007, 02:14:05 PM
Either that, or the workers were the first to test the Lusankya's brig...
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on April 26, 2007, 02:14:43 PM
there are many options
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Kratas on May 22, 2007, 01:04:28 PM
of course he didnt kill them
 some body wouldve noticed the dissapearance of millions of people it was probably dark side influence wait just think of what happened when the lusankya went up  people falling on the lusankya's bridge  that would be funny in a cartoon
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on May 23, 2007, 09:12:21 AM
I believe he killed them.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Kratas on May 23, 2007, 12:54:29 PM
maybe no one lived in that part of coruscant when it was buried but they put people were allowed to live there after it was buried

or palpatine could of just scheduled the area for destruction legally so nobody thought anything out of the ordinary happened
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on May 23, 2007, 01:09:59 PM
he wouldn't bother anything hard to succeed. He killed them, that was the best and easiest solution for Palpatine.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Slornie on May 24, 2007, 03:46:38 AM
maybe no one lived in that part of coruscant when it was buried but they put people were allowed to live there after it was buried
on a planet where space is at such a premium ?? i doubt they would let even the smallest area be unpopulated, especially not an area the size of a the Lusankya (remember it was built on the surface of the planet, so that would mean that there was nothing at all on that patch of ground, or anywhere above it)
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on May 24, 2007, 11:21:20 AM
There would have had to be a heck of a lot free space. Wasn't Lusankya 19km long like all Executor-class SSDs?
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Kratas on May 24, 2007, 02:49:32 PM
well then couldnt he of scheduled a area for destruction and then put the lusankya there
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on May 25, 2007, 03:42:51 AM
I think there would be some note in somewhere.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Kratas on May 25, 2007, 05:29:50 PM
some note in what
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on May 26, 2007, 01:32:25 AM
I mean there would have been somekind of mention if he had destroyed part of Coruscant.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Kratas on May 26, 2007, 04:23:30 AM
aswould there be if he killed thousands maybe millions of people
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on May 26, 2007, 08:38:14 AM
no if he would have made it look like an accident. and who said he killed them all in same time in same place.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Noret on May 26, 2007, 10:53:55 AM
he could have had the ship land on them and it wasnt put archives because only an idiot would put that in the archives
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Kratas on May 26, 2007, 11:52:21 AM
thats not a bad idea
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on May 31, 2007, 01:04:12 AM
will rebels have any of their captured SSDs on use?
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Kratas on May 31, 2007, 06:00:34 AM
i think they should get the lusankya eventually
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Corey on May 31, 2007, 03:20:39 PM
The Rebellion will not have the Lusankya, New Republic will.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on June 01, 2007, 01:05:51 AM
thank you for that information.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Kratas on June 01, 2007, 04:19:45 PM
cool im looking forward to it
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Scarecrow63 on July 13, 2007, 04:42:05 PM
About the Lusankya thing Both Fondor and Kuat said they built the Executor, but Executor was built at Fondor, the Lusankya was built under the same name at Kuat at the same time to make it look like only one was being built, after completion though, the one from Fondor was given to Vader and the Kuat one was taken to Coruscant
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Corey on July 13, 2007, 05:09:37 PM
Don't necro post.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: GrndAdmrlPellaeon on July 17, 2007, 12:26:27 AM
Will the Eclipse be in any of the releases?


Also, why dont you just lock all topics with 40 days of being not posted in?
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Corey on July 17, 2007, 12:28:01 AM
Yes, it will. We've shown a render of it recently, it will be the Clone Emperor's flagship.

We sometimes allow people to necro post, but only with permission from us.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Raptor on July 17, 2007, 04:51:35 PM
Than the Clone Emperor will be one of my targets to play as when he comes out.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: bigmommy on August 03, 2007, 01:33:59 PM
eeeeeh....
I think it will be funny ;): "ELEGY"-class Super Star Destroyer (commander Taruun Khai, commander of 6th devision of 501st legion, fleet commander of whole 501st. He showed himself in the battle over Coruscant (Clone Wars) and over HOTH (Civil War, EP4)) - enormous battlestation, secret base of 501st, wich can take on board four million soldiers, 1,5 million of personell five hundred thousand battle machines like AT-AT, AT-ST and so one, four "Executor"-class Super Star Destroyers, one "Sovereign"-class Super Star Destroyer, two hundred Interdictors, five hundred ISDs, one million starfighters and bombers. Has got six interdictor field generators, improved engines, almost undestructible shield generators, very powerful shields, two cloaking devices, three command briges one hangar for Star Destroyers, ten hangars for starfighters and brand-new hyperdrive. That's all, i think  ::)
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Corey on August 03, 2007, 01:42:17 PM
What the fuck?
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Scarecrow63 on August 03, 2007, 03:36:41 PM
What the hell does that even mean?
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Tyrant on August 03, 2007, 03:38:43 PM
What the fuck is that all supposed to mean? Seriously. Are you proposing some sort of new Star Dreadnaught?
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Raptor on August 03, 2007, 09:42:03 PM
Maybe hes trying to make a new faction.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on August 04, 2007, 03:01:07 AM
Or that could be somesort of weird joke nobody understands.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: bigmommy on August 10, 2007, 12:58:11 PM
Come on dudes, it was just a fucking dream!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!   >:( You are standing between man and his dreams, shame on you!!!!!!  ;)
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on August 10, 2007, 02:02:22 PM
Hell I have weird dreams too.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Kratas on August 10, 2007, 02:06:37 PM
i have such wierd dreams sometimes i apparently talk backwards in my sleep
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Corey on August 10, 2007, 02:07:36 PM
Stay on topic... Stay on topic...
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Kratas on August 10, 2007, 02:10:46 PM
yes sir anyway

i think a ssd could of taken down the death star 1 somehow lets hear your veiws
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Corey on August 10, 2007, 02:12:03 PM
If there weren't any shields and it was left there to pound it for a few days, then it could.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: GrndAdmrlPellaeon on August 10, 2007, 02:50:12 PM
If DS1 could take out a planet it could take out a SSD.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Corey on August 10, 2007, 03:04:23 PM
No it couldn't. They wouldn't be able to hit it with the superlaser.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Kratas on August 10, 2007, 03:19:29 PM
and remember the 1st death star has a weakness and i think a ssd could survive long enough to get above it and release its vast array of bombers and fighters and its own missiles
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Raptor on August 10, 2007, 03:56:19 PM
no. A superlase could easily destroy an SSD
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: GrndAdmrlPellaeon on August 10, 2007, 09:07:36 PM
The Death Star prototype took down ships the size of the Millenium Falcon. DS1 could take out a massive ship like a SSD.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Scarecrow63 on August 10, 2007, 09:10:38 PM
DS prototype missed an entire planet, it would easily miss a SSD, and both the prototype and the DS1 lacked the targeting capabalitites of the DS2
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Corey on August 10, 2007, 09:11:10 PM
There is a an extraordinarily small chance that the DS1 could target the Executor. The Executor could just fly around to the opposite side of it before the DS1 could get any sort of lock on it. If it stayed still, then eventually they'd get the aim right, but it could very possibly be detsroyed by then.

When did the prototype ever hit a ship the size of the Falcon while it was aiming for em?
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: GrndAdmrlPellaeon on August 10, 2007, 09:13:25 PM
That was the controllers fault.


In Champions of the Force, it might have been a corvette.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Scarecrow63 on August 10, 2007, 09:18:00 PM
But thats just caused it fired randomly into a mass of enemys
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: GrndAdmrlPellaeon on August 10, 2007, 09:40:16 PM
But an SSD is massive. The Executor is 17 kilometers long. If it fires in a mass of enemies it could fire on an SSD.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Corey on August 10, 2007, 10:01:50 PM
It could TRY to hit it, that doesn't mean it's going to. The Executor can move faster than it, and if it misses once, it has to spend a load of time recharging for another shot. If the shields are down (If they were up it would have all the time in the world and eventually hit it) then the Executor could most likely destroy the superlaser dish within minutes.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: sarcronis on August 10, 2007, 11:05:05 PM
The Ds1 also had thousands of weapons other than the superlaser, ion cannons, turbolasers, hundreds of fighters and probably more stuff.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on August 11, 2007, 02:35:00 AM
And Executor-class SSDs were 19km long. I think that DSI wouldn't have been able to hit Executor with it's superlaser. But as sarcronis said there were thousands of other guns, turbolaser, ion cannons. But Executor was more mobile. It could have destroyed the weapons points of one spot and then say on that spot and fire upon it. I think that Executor would have won DSI.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Scarecrow63 on August 11, 2007, 01:29:28 PM
And the DS1 had one shot before it had to recharge, i think it was close to a day
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on August 11, 2007, 01:30:58 PM
yep. but That power was needed to destroy a planet. I think that they wouldn't have need the full power to destroy Executor.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Scarecrow63 on August 11, 2007, 01:31:51 PM
If the DS1 could lower its power output, it wasnt designed for it
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on August 11, 2007, 01:37:54 PM
wasn't it. then never mind what I said.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Scarecrow63 on August 11, 2007, 01:39:11 PM
I dont know that it couldnt, im just saying its only purpose was for planets, nothing else was considered to be a target
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on August 11, 2007, 01:41:54 PM
you are propably right.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: sarcronis on August 11, 2007, 02:01:28 PM
In a ssd vs ds1 i really don't know who would win.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on August 11, 2007, 02:03:10 PM
SSD propably. Especially if it would be commanded by Thrawn.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Scarecrow63 on August 11, 2007, 02:18:35 PM
But maybe only Thrawn, otherwise the DS1 would just overwhelm it with firepower and shield power
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on August 11, 2007, 02:27:18 PM
I'm not so sure.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Scarecrow63 on August 11, 2007, 07:53:41 PM
Taim & Bak D6 turbolaser batteries (5,000)
Taim & Bak XX-9 heavy turbolasers (5,000)
SFS L-s 4.9 laser cannons (2,500)
Borstel MS-1 ion cannons (2,500)
Phylon tractor beam generators (768)


Id say thats more than enough
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: sarcronis on August 11, 2007, 08:07:00 PM
That's the Ds1 firepower.  Dang.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Corey on August 11, 2007, 08:10:13 PM
Then you need to take into account radius and range. They would be evenly spaced around the gigantic station, so very few could shoot at one time.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Kratas on August 12, 2007, 11:20:31 AM
i agree
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Scarecrow63 on August 12, 2007, 01:48:33 PM
Plus the 7000 starfighters and 4 strike cruisers
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Corey on August 12, 2007, 01:51:22 PM
I don't believe we're counting the Fighters, otherwise the Executor's could just do the trench run and it's not really the Executor and Death Star fighting.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Scarecrow63 on August 12, 2007, 01:58:02 PM
Okay, then take the DS1 shields into account, i mean it could create enough energy to destroy a planet, those shields would have been a liitle tougher than the ssd
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Corey on August 12, 2007, 02:07:56 PM
Yep. Thats why I said a few pages ago it would win assuming the DS1's shields were down.


also, I think this is straying from the topic.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Scarecrow63 on August 12, 2007, 02:32:49 PM
we're still talkin about ssds
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Corey on August 12, 2007, 02:52:15 PM
Not anything that has to do with the mod though.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: sarcronis on August 12, 2007, 08:17:14 PM
How many ssd's will be in the mod, or can't you say??
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Corey on August 12, 2007, 08:19:02 PM
In R1:
Executor-Class

R2:
Executor,
Sovereign,
Eclipse,
Viscount

R3:
Possibly a Mandator
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Scarecrow63 on August 12, 2007, 10:19:27 PM
Can you build multiples, and is the Empire the only ones allowed to get them?
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Corey on August 12, 2007, 10:40:12 PM
In R1:
Executor-Class -Unlimited, Empire

R2:
Executor, -Unlimited, Empire
Sovereign, -limited, Empire
Eclipse,- limited, Empire
Viscount -Unlimited, New Republic

R3:
Possibly a Mandator -Limited, Republic
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Scarecrow63 on August 12, 2007, 10:44:58 PM
Any way for the NR to get an executor class?
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: sarcronis on August 12, 2007, 10:58:07 PM
Unlimited Executer, and Viscount?  One word....AWESOME!
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Kratas on August 13, 2007, 05:33:42 AM
hm whats a viscount  ??? well time to head for google
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: GrndAdmrlPellaeon on August 13, 2007, 09:06:27 AM
How many is limited for the Sovereign and Eclipse. and why is Mandator limited?
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: sarcronis on August 13, 2007, 09:53:12 AM
The Mandator was only used in the Kuat defense fleet and only had a few produced.  If there had been anymore, the republic would have gone broke.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on August 15, 2007, 08:34:12 AM
I think that Eclipse should be limited also. I mean with a superlaser, when you have one Eclipse in a battle you don't need the rest of the fleet.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Kratas on August 15, 2007, 11:13:38 AM
thats true although i think executors should be limited
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on August 15, 2007, 11:57:28 AM
But Executor was built in large quatities. there were 12 or more if I remember right. there was only two Eclipse.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Scarecrow63 on August 15, 2007, 01:55:48 PM
And the way they're makin the mod if im thinkin right, building a ssd will take enough money and time that you wont have all that many anyways
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on August 15, 2007, 02:04:37 PM
yep. I have understood it so.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: GrndAdmrlPellaeon on August 19, 2007, 03:48:23 PM
Eclipse is limited.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on August 20, 2007, 07:53:50 AM
ah they have changedit.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Corey on August 20, 2007, 03:34:35 PM
No we haven't...
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Kratas on August 20, 2007, 03:39:20 PM
it was always limited
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Scarecrow63 on August 20, 2007, 04:31:42 PM
he said that in the first place
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on August 21, 2007, 07:47:44 AM
then I think I have been clouded by the light side of the force.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: sarcronis on August 21, 2007, 11:40:17 AM
with too much of the light side, you start to see things.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Kratas on August 21, 2007, 01:31:40 PM
really i didn know that
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on August 21, 2007, 01:47:06 PM
I must embrace the Dark side. Only then I'm strong enough.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Scarecrow63 on August 21, 2007, 01:48:58 PM
Until Yoda comes and cuts your head off
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on August 21, 2007, 02:04:46 PM
Yoda will not stop me. I will become the most powerful sith in the history of the Galaxy!
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Scarecrow63 on August 21, 2007, 02:05:48 PM
Sure, sith maybe, but Yoda was just to kickass
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on August 21, 2007, 02:06:16 PM
He will flee and I will hunt his friends down.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Scarecrow63 on August 21, 2007, 02:09:28 PM
Then i use my SSD to blow you up
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on August 21, 2007, 02:20:54 PM
I will turn the laser shots back at your ship using the force.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Scarecrow63 on August 21, 2007, 02:21:22 PM
And my shield soak them up, i then nuke you
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on August 21, 2007, 02:27:30 PM
great. back on topic.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: GrndAdmrlPellaeon on August 25, 2007, 11:32:00 PM
Youre just saying that cause he beat you.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Kalo on August 26, 2007, 12:47:58 AM
eeeeeh....
I think it will be funny ;): "ELEGY"-class Super Star Destroyer (commander Taruun Khai, commander of 6th devision of 501st legion, fleet commander of whole 501st. He showed himself in the battle over Coruscant (Clone Wars) and over HOTH (Civil War, EP4)) - enormous battlestation, secret base of 501st, wich can take on board four million soldiers, 1,5 million of personell five hundred thousand battle machines like AT-AT, AT-ST and so one, four "Executor"-class Super Star Destroyers, one "Sovereign"-class Super Star Destroyer, two hundred Interdictors, five hundred ISDs, one million starfighters and bombers. Has got six interdictor field generators, improved engines, almost undestructible shield generators, very powerful shields, two cloaking devices, three command briges one hangar for Star Destroyers, ten hangars for starfighters and brand-new hyperdrive. That's all, i think  ::)


Jesus Fucking Christ, thats not a ship, Thats your mother on a bad day...
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on August 26, 2007, 02:15:13 AM
Youre just saying that cause he beat you.
No. I just think that if he wants to continue this discussion we two have we should make a topic for it. sooner or later someone ekse comes and commands: back on topic.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: ItchyTasty on September 13, 2007, 11:53:26 PM
Heres a question, what kind of armorment are we going to be able to expect from these wonderful little contraptions? Will they be standardized for play with other FOC/EAW ships or will they have hundreds of turbolasers to make me happy as they shred enemy ships to peices?
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Slornie on September 14, 2007, 05:48:01 AM
I expect that the mod team will balance them in-game, and even if they didnt - i dont think the Alamo engine can handle hundreds of hardpoints on a single ship..
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Corey on September 14, 2007, 07:54:10 AM
It can, we can't. The Executor has 84 weapon hardpoints with dual firing bones, Viscount will be about the same number, Eclipse will probably be around 70. No idea about any others yet.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Scarecrow63 on September 14, 2007, 11:38:09 AM
Nice, talk about firepower
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on September 14, 2007, 11:59:25 AM
yep. that is great firepower we are speaking.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: ItchyTasty on September 14, 2007, 01:04:36 PM
fantastic. I'm currently using the executor model from the Conflict in Space mod it sports 25 targetable and 2 hidden hardpoints. It works quite nicely, Ive seen other mods using more.

Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Scarecrow63 on September 14, 2007, 10:20:36 PM
Will the Executor have more than one hangar?
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Meyer on September 15, 2007, 01:56:43 AM
I sure hope it has.

And Scarecrow63  gongratulations for making 1000 posts.
Title: Re: Super Star Destroyers
Post by: Scarecrow63 on September 15, 2007, 07:13:06 PM
ty, ill screenie when i get 1337

and more than one hangar would make sense on a ship of that size, be annoying if they killed one hardpoint and there goes your fighters