Author Topic: (SPLIT) from Revelation, FoC Canon? (Read 32706 times)

Corey · « **Reply #60 on:** March 18, 2008, 08:17:39 PM »

By that logic, the Corporate Sector, Black Sun, Hapans, Empire of the Hand and Chiss shouldn't have been made.

GrndAdmrlPellaeon · « **Reply #61 on:** March 18, 2008, 08:31:19 PM »

What about Yv? That Imperium thing. Killiks. The list goes on.

Corey · « **Reply #62 on:** March 18, 2008, 08:33:06 PM »

They weren't inserted into a time where there was other stuff, so I don't think they mean those.

GrndAdmrlPellaeon · « **Reply #63 on:** March 18, 2008, 08:33:52 PM »

As always, Im confused.

strike23 · « **Reply #64 on:** March 18, 2008, 08:41:26 PM »

Quote from: Arbiter on March 18, 2008, 08:17:39 PM

By that logic, the Corporate Sector, Black Sun, Hapans, Empire of the Hand and Chiss shouldn't have been made.

thats true but none of them stick out quite as much as the consortium does. But since they don't interfere with anything than i guess i have to accept them as cannon

Isamu · « **Reply #65 on:** March 18, 2008, 09:38:19 PM »

i mean stuff that would severely alter the main storyline. (tyber zann taking over the galaxy)

Scarecrow63 · « **Reply #66 on:** March 18, 2008, 09:50:39 PM »

which he never does in-game...

Isamu · « **Reply #67 on:** March 18, 2008, 11:52:40 PM »

yea but he takes some major imperial planets.

Meyer · « **Reply #68 on:** March 19, 2008, 09:04:37 AM »

no he doesn't. he just corrupts them he doesn't really conguer so many of them.

Slornie · « **Reply #69 on:** March 19, 2008, 09:07:23 AM »

If you want to argue it that way, how many planets did the Rebel Alliance capture in EAW? Another canonical problem in EAW is when you send R2D2 and C3PO to Wayland (which was supposedly "lost" until the Thrawn Crisis in 9 ABY).

Isamu · « **Reply #70 on:** March 19, 2008, 06:04:52 PM »

yea foc was definatly a load of bull crap while fun to play but bull crap.

Meyer · « **Reply #71 on:** March 20, 2008, 01:40:06 AM »

You could Equally say that KOTOR is bull crap. there is no mention of Revan or the main characters before it that I know of. but still you seem to accept that very well. Just as there is no mention about Zann before FOC. same thing. so by that logic if you say Zann is fake so is Revan.

aNaRcHiSt44 · « **Reply #72 on:** March 20, 2008, 05:06:39 AM »

Funny thing is that they had to start off the KotOR era with something, so doing it with a agme was probably a better decision than making it a book. At least KotOR is justified and doesnt conflict with anything and is fully canon, and people from that era that arent even mentioned in those games have appeared in the books. And btw, I am pretty sure that Revan would have been mentioned somewhere before the KotOR games, along with Nihilius, Kreia, the Jedi Exile, etc. And Meyer you obviously mis-interpreted what people have been saying. Dont jump to conclusions, and you cant just say that just because someone says Zann isnt real implies that Revan isnt real, because as I said, he doesnt conflict with anything, and also as before, he has probably been emntioned. Dont use logic in a false way, and not in a way that is malignantly idiotical.

Slornie · « **Reply #73 on:** March 20, 2008, 07:10:53 AM »

On the other hand, there is nothing to say that Zann hasnt been mentioned in other books, either under an alias, or as an unnamed underworld organisation.

Qui0jinn · « **Reply #74 on:** March 20, 2008, 07:47:21 AM »

The thing is that the Star Wars "Canon" is always being expanded (and it can do that cause its fiction), you'd expect as a result that there are gonna be errors like the Consortium not being mention previously (not that I myself am a fan of ZC, but on the other hand I dont much like the YV either).

Meyer · « **Reply #75 on:** March 20, 2008, 09:05:47 AM »

and I also like to point that there is no mention of Karrde's group being the largest in Galaxy before HotE. And No there is no mention of Revan or any other KOTOR character before the games. And I just used your arguments of why Zann isn't real to claim that Revan isn't real. And that was only to point something. That you don't accept your idea when it's turned against you. And I don't see Zann conflicting with anything. Say one thing.

strike23 · « **Reply #76 on:** March 20, 2008, 12:07:05 PM »

the difference with KOTOR is that it takes place 4000 years before anything else in the star wars universe

vadereclipse · « **Reply #77 on:** March 20, 2008, 01:30:50 PM »

before kotor's release, there was nothing that happened in that time period. kotor created the era. foc did not create an era. it expanded an existing era.

Slornie · « **Reply #78 on:** March 20, 2008, 03:41:19 PM »

And until KOTOR was created, there was no reference to that era in any other canon source.

Meyer · « **Reply #79 on:** March 20, 2008, 04:38:32 PM »

and how does that make it more acceptable as canon than FOC?

Author Topic: (SPLIT) from Revelation, FoC Canon? (Read 32706 times)

strike23

aNaRcHiSt44

strike23