Author Topic: attack Choppers (Read 37269 times)

s-t-n · « **Reply #20 on:** September 28, 2007, 04:32:44 AM »

which is gonna cause another depression if you ask m...the customers will panic and withdraw their money frm the banks. the banks cant pay everyone so they take money back from other countries. businesses in U.S and other countries will collapse and people still wont get their money. emd result = depression.

Slornie · « **Reply #21 on:** September 28, 2007, 05:55:27 AM »

Unless the Federal Reserve backs the banks.. like the Bank of England promised to do recently if Northern Rock went under..

But this has gone slightly off topic - economic depression is more suited to the Fall of the USA thread methinks..

Meyer · « **Reply #22 on:** September 28, 2007, 06:19:01 AM »

or like Finland supported banks in the resession of 1990s. but how does anything of this relate to attack choppers?

Kratas · « **Reply #23 on:** September 28, 2007, 12:31:25 PM »

one word

TOPIC

Meyer · « **Reply #24 on:** September 28, 2007, 12:50:50 PM »

Isn't this KA-50 supposed to be the best attack chopper in the world now? I mean it is said to be better than any other chopper that is used by usa, gb or russia.

Scarecrow63 · « **Reply #25 on:** September 28, 2007, 06:29:55 PM »

uh, its made by Russia, so it cant be any better than itself

GrndAdmrlPellaeon · « **Reply #26 on:** September 28, 2007, 11:04:00 PM »

Why does Russia matter? There still in the toilet. I mean no offense to any Russians or Russian fanboys, but you cant consider them a major power yet.

Raptor · « **Reply #27 on:** September 28, 2007, 11:23:04 PM »

M-T-L and Meyer, you just kiss up to any german or soviet anything.

Mandalore-the-Inquizitor · « **Reply #28 on:** September 28, 2007, 11:48:34 PM »

Well one thing never changes Raptor Know Nothing I happen to not Belive evry once of bull shit propaganda the us feeds every day

THE Russain make good Weapons The germans make good weaopos Enven finland makes good guns and stuff

The Us Makes Cheap Relible Crap In huge qualitys Other counterys cant afford to sling out replacement tanks and guns every year

Scarecrow63 · « **Reply #29 on:** September 28, 2007, 11:50:03 PM »

What the hell are you talking about? How the hell is US stuff going to be cheap crap? And there is no propaganda, only some peoples paranoia

Mandalore-the-Inquizitor · « **Reply #30 on:** September 28, 2007, 11:56:06 PM »

oh please The First gulf war the us lost $ tank aginst How many T-72 Thats bull shit and i know it look U wann cripple america Dont give us gas And were fucked The M-16 for instance is Cheap As is our army bein theve been presented with like 10 new replacements but they rejected them all for 1 reason they cost too much THe us Like Chep Mass Produced Guns And that Vile pos the abrams is a gas guzzler Kill off the fuel convoys and Screech Their not movin They basicly sit Ther and bee target practice

Scarecrow63 · « **Reply #31 on:** September 28, 2007, 11:59:59 PM »

Wow, someone needs to chill

The Abrams tank is one of the most advanced tanks in the world, how the hell is it cheap crap?
And the M-16 is an amazing gun, its used by hundreds of organizations and works wonderfly, they're aren't 'cheap' and they're mass produced cause they sell so many, what do you want a handmade rifle for every soldier with so many inconcistisies every gun is different?

Meyer · « **Reply #32 on:** September 29, 2007, 02:06:28 AM »

Quote from: Raptor on September 28, 2007, 11:23:04 PM

M-T-L and Meyer, you just kiss up to any german or soviet anything.

Well if it's a beautiful woman, then yes.

And M-T-I, maybe you should check your medication.

And I think that Abrams isn't even the best tank of USA anymore. it's good though. you shouldn't underestimate the weaponary of USA, M-T-I. But neither should anyone underestimate the weaponary of Russia.

I don't think that M-16 is a good weapon. too much plastic. but the more advangend model, M-4, now that's a great gun.

Mandalore-the-Inquizitor · « **Reply #33 on:** September 29, 2007, 02:07:28 PM »

i dont underestimate the us weapons i knoe theri goo but they try and make them sound in vunrable qand this is all off topic so back on topic

Scarecrow63 · « **Reply #34 on:** September 29, 2007, 02:19:06 PM »

What US tank is better than the Abrams?

And all guns are going away from metals now

Slornie · « **Reply #35 on:** September 29, 2007, 02:21:08 PM »

Makes them lighter, and eliminates some of the weaknesses attributed to the metal.

Scarecrow63 · « **Reply #36 on:** September 29, 2007, 02:21:36 PM »

Yeah, everybody is moving on to composites

Meyer · « **Reply #37 on:** September 29, 2007, 06:48:09 PM »

but composites are more vulnerable for nature. and I bet there must be some american tank that can beat abrams. not sure tough.

Scarecrow63 · « **Reply #38 on:** September 29, 2007, 06:49:34 PM »

more vulnerable for nature?

No, the Abrams is the latest production tank for the US, theres nothing that the US has thats better, there isn't a reason to make something better, its fine as is

Meyer · « **Reply #39 on:** September 29, 2007, 06:51:53 PM »

well someday you have to. but apparently that day hasn't arrived yet.

And yes. in vietnam war it was discovered that M-16 was more likely to jam because of water, sand and dust. AK-47 handled those problems much better. but maybe that is fixed now.