0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Excellent!But actually, while playing a bit of Galactic Conquest again i realised i have an approach somewhat between Harrsk and Delvardus.I build massive fleets of Victory II Stardestroyer, and Escortcarriers
I think you mean a combination of Delvardus and Teradoc
I wasnt sure about that myself.Victories do classify as Battleships so thats more Harrskthe great numbers are more from Teradoc true, but i build bigger ship(and with massive fleets in this case its about 5-10 victories at a borderplanet)so i went with Harrsk.Damn you, now im confused ^^
I do say Harrsk gets some points for trying to be more of the traditional fleet while keeping a balance but at the same time, it makes me feel that this really is a weakness that will blow in his face given time.His fleet is sorta becomes a jack of all trades deal, with a good number of ships but having decent firepower to make it a fight when he has to. While this works very well with the Rebellion...I can't say the same for the New Republic. The NR as time goes by has proven to grow past their old weakness of fleets composed of either old formidable war machines or ships quickly converted for war and are quickly making progress on making actual war machines that can more or less keep up with ISDs. Overtime, I think Harrsk will find himself outgunned/outnumbered eventually.
By the time of the new class standardization, the MC90 will probably equal to slightly defeat an ISD-I, while a Nebula SD will, without difficulty, defeat an ISD-I.
I'd expect the Tector would probably pull even with the Nebula, maybe be a bit more powerful even, except the Nebula's fighters vs the no-hangar Tector would wreck it.
yes, i'm resurecting this, but i would also go Delvardus route. or maybe somewhere in between Delvardus and Harrsk....
absolutely. plus tie defenders, interceptors, and the 4 pod tie bombers