Author Topic: What would you likein game? (Read 24265 times)

kucsidave · « **on:** January 30, 2014, 08:31:02 PM »

I AMNOT IN PLACE TO BRING THIS TOREALLITY!!!
i just asking, if u were in position, what would be add or remove from the game

i am curiousfor ideas you have in mind

just lke: i found out that the DL used immobilizer 418s and other capitals as well

"...The famous Han Solo was temporarily made a commodore and placed in charge of this force. However, on the way to take command of the Fifth, his shuttle was yanked out of hyperspace by a Yevethan Immobilizer 418 cruiser and he was brought before Nil Spaar on N'zoth."
source:
http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Black_Fleet_Crisis

"...New Republic Intelligence later divulged that the smallest class of ship represented in Camp Pa'aal Squadron was the 600m Immobilizer 418 interdictor.
An "Interdictor Dreadnaught", the Imperator, was responsible for the seizure of the New Republic shuttle Tampion..."
source:
http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Black_Fleet
So interdictors too...
Should be intrestingto see in game isn't it???

tlmiller · « **Reply #1 on:** January 30, 2014, 10:01:44 PM »

Mine would be simple. I'd love to see some IR vessels spawn Tie Avengers. They're my favorite starfighter. I understand why they're not in the game, but that would be my one change if I could do it.

Revanchist · « **Reply #2 on:** January 30, 2014, 11:40:39 PM »

Mine would be to give the EotH an SSD (lol, runs away before killed by angry mod team)

On a serious note, I would like to see an end to the freeze (hopefully soon this will be a reality), a proper PA Era advancement or something equivalent (Maybe something like R2 and 3POs Steal Tech ability, except with Gregor purchasing it; will never happen because PA is the fourth faction), and Gladiators for the PA.

Lord Xizer · « **Reply #3 on:** January 31, 2014, 12:27:22 AM »

A Total War aspect to ICW with politics, coups, assassinations and war on ALL fronts!

kucsidave · « **Reply #4 on:** March 11, 2014, 06:41:04 AM »

Quote from: Revanchist on January 30, 2014, 11:40:39 PM

...a proper PA Era advancement or something equivalent (Maybe something like R2 and 3POs Steal Tech ability, except with Gregor purchasing it; will never happen because PA is the fourth faction), and Gladiators for the PA.

Well, if u think carefully you will understand why this isnt't in game
HEROES ARE NOT RETURNING
You steal 1 tech and you lost your hero forever

However i want to see a proper PA advancement...
In fact, with open office i made a shipset comparison between the imperial fractions(IR,PA,IW(Warlords),DL), and i found out that the PA has the most "Light Frigate Yard" units(nearly twice as much as IR), but have half as much Capitals and nearly half as much "Heavy Frigate Yard" Units
if someone want the shiplist i will send it to him

I tried to compare the ships as primary: Production facility, secondary: Role

Revanchist · « **Reply #5 on:** March 11, 2014, 08:26:24 PM »

Possibly; I'm no coder (yet) but it would not surprise me if you could have him return after tech buying (think of Pellaeon retuning at Era 5) while still letting him die permanently if actually killed.

Lord Xizer · « **Reply #6 on:** March 11, 2014, 09:20:41 PM »

Would also be nice if Zsinj's ships spawned TIE Raptors...

kucsidave · « **Reply #7 on:** March 12, 2014, 12:58:03 PM »

Quote from: Lord Xizer on March 11, 2014, 09:20:41 PM

Would also be nice if Zsinj's ships spawned TIE Raptors...

Also would be good if the tech trees of the 2 Zsinj GC would have the same tech tree...
In the smaller version You are able to build SSDs as Zsinj, but in the larger you can not...
If u ask me it'd be better at least the opposite way

Singularity · « **Reply #8 on:** March 12, 2014, 05:31:54 PM »

Playable Zsinj (or another warlord faction) in one of the big GC's would be pretty sweet.

Thunderdome08 · « **Reply #9 on:** March 12, 2014, 07:11:42 PM »

When you have fleetsizes > the pop cap can you make it so only 1 unit jumps in and the player can jump the rest in at will?

theDefender · « **Reply #10 on:** March 12, 2014, 08:42:06 PM »

what I would like in the next update is more stuff for the PA There units are unique but it would be nice to see more clone war units in there like b2 battle droids or AAT's and maybe some transports as well. It would also be cool if they added more space units from the clone wars. and had a better tech tree for the PA. It would be nice if they had mini missions in GC. for example some planet might ask you to liberate them, or a planet might rebel. natives are also missed and should be put back in.

Slornie · « **Reply #11 on:** March 13, 2014, 02:06:38 PM »

@Thunderdome08: I doubt it's possible to make this happen automatically, but you can do it manually using the pathfinder slot:

Quote from: Slornie on October 29, 2013, 02:29:53 PM

2) The players talking about hyperspacing individual units into battle instead of relying on the auto-fleet are using the pathfinder slot in their space fleets (top left with a gold border). If there is a unit in that slot then only that unit will hyperspace in at the start of the battle; allowing the player more control over what other ships they bring in, when they bring them in, and where the put them. This was a feature introduced in Forces of Corruption (see page 9 of the FoC manual).

Lord Xizer · « **Reply #12 on:** March 13, 2014, 08:19:27 PM »

Quote from: Singularity on March 12, 2014, 05:31:54 PM

Playable Zsinj (or another warlord faction) in one of the big GC's would be pretty sweet.

There is a way to do that in the XML files as I recall, but it makes the main factions unplayable and is crash prone but it has been done.

I too like the Warlords. I was the chief arguer for Delvardus, Teradoc and Harrsk being included(as well as the PA so I could have Jerec and Kaine playable, my sinister goal from the very beginning mwuhahahaha!) For some reason the Warlords fascinate me and I'd love some multiplayer aspects with them, but some things simply can't be done due to base game limits.

Carnivore Jacques · « **Reply #13 on:** March 13, 2014, 09:53:10 PM »

In the same vein, I wonder if multiplayer GC with more than two people is possible.

Lord Xizer · « **Reply #14 on:** March 13, 2014, 10:06:00 PM »

Quote from: Carnivore Jacques on March 13, 2014, 09:53:10 PM

In the same vein, I wonder if multiplayer GC with more than two people is possible.

Unlikely, again due to limitations in Petro

Singularity · « **Reply #15 on:** March 14, 2014, 12:58:18 PM »

I know its completely impossible due to the game's limitations, but being able to form treaties and alliances (a la SoaSE) would also be awesome.

kucsidave · « **Reply #16 on:** March 14, 2014, 03:54:31 PM »

Quote from: Lord Xizer on March 13, 2014, 08:19:27 PM

I too like the Warlords. I was the chief arguer for Delvardus, Teradoc and Harrsk being included(as well as the PA so I could have Jerec and Kaine playable, my sinister goal from the very beginning mwuhahahaha!) For some reason the Warlords fascinate me and I'd love some multiplayer aspects with them, but some things simply can't be done due to base game limits.

Well you are not alone...
Somehow i am a large Warlord fan too...
I even created "my own" Warlord fraction's plans about land and space units, with unique units...(of course not original star wars fraction)
I don't want to make a public mod, it is just for myself...
So sad EaW have theese limits...

Singularity · « **Reply #17 on:** March 14, 2014, 06:59:17 PM »

This is a nitpick, but the AT-PTs should be made a bit smaller, they're actually bigger than AT-STs in the game!

Weaver · « **Reply #18 on:** March 15, 2014, 07:28:48 PM »

Feasible requests:

Make the AI build and appropriately use SSDs. Right now they are too easy to blow up with fighters, or in general--the AI doesn't retreat, and Auto-Resolve doesn't work correctly--every time I send 100 fighters into a battle Auto-Resolve kills them all without any losses.

Less feasible:

EotH SSD?

Corey · « **Reply #19 on:** March 15, 2014, 08:06:05 PM »

Quote

Revanchist and Kucisdave on PA Era Advancement

While the non-respawning heroes thing prssents a significant limitation to having the PA use the Rebel's version of tech advancement, the main reason we wouldn't go that route is because it doesn't make any sense considering that they would already have the designs for stuff. As we've said, considering we can't make it timeline based for obvious reasons, we'd rather have it be astrography based. The problem with this and any other PA progression is their overall lack of units.

Quote from: Singularity on March 12, 2014, 05:31:54 PM

Playable Zsinj (or another warlord faction) in one of the big GC's would be pretty sweet.

This would require that another faction (the Remnant) be unplayable in that GC, and the GC would have to be non-progressive.

Quote from: theDefender on March 12, 2014, 08:42:06 PM

what I would like in the next update is more stuff for the PA There units are unique but it would be nice to see more clone war units in there like b2 battle droids or AAT's and maybe some transports as well. It would also be cool if they added more space units from the clone wars. and had a better tech tree for the PA.

We really don't want to just randomly throw in Clone Wars units for them, because that's not what they were; the Clone Wars units they do have are in because they were still being used in areas related to the PA

Quote

It would be nice if they had mini missions in GC. for example some planet might ask you to liberate them, or a planet might rebel. .

We already have one (the Katana mission), but those take several months to make. As for the other small "liberate this planet" stuff that came up in EaW, it's essentially identical to our planet capture rewards.

Quote

natives are also missed and should be put back in

We've never removed them, we've even added some...

Quote from: Supreme on March 15, 2014, 07:28:48 PM

Feasible requests:

Make the AI build and appropriately use SSDs. Right now they are too easy to blow up with fighters, or in general--the AI doesn't retreat, and Auto-Resolve doesn't work correctly--every time I send 100 fighters into a battle Auto-Resolve kills them all without any losses.

None of this is actually feasible or even possible to fix in EaW.

Quote from: Supreme on March 15, 2014, 07:28:48 PM

Less feasible:

EotH SSD?

Never.