Author Topic: Executor vs Viscount (Read 38535 times)

Meyer · « **Reply #40 on:** August 31, 2007, 02:22:51 PM »

well the fact that imperial shields were good and though. And how do you support your idea that viscount has better shields.

Scarecrow63 · « **Reply #41 on:** August 31, 2007, 02:25:29 PM »

Sure Imperial shields were strong, im not saying they're are weak, but when comparing every other moncal ship to its imperial counterpart, the moncal shields are always better

Slornie · « **Reply #42 on:** August 31, 2007, 02:49:30 PM »

Quote from: Meyer on August 31, 2007, 07:41:34 AM

and would propably have a better trained and motivated crew. propably even more experienced one.

Better trained, quite probably, more experienced, maybe. But i always feel that the Rebels were more motivated than the Imperials.

Meyer · « **Reply #43 on:** August 31, 2007, 03:44:55 PM »

Quote from: Scarecrow63 on August 31, 2007, 02:25:29 PM

Sure Imperial shields were strong, im not saying they're are weak, but when comparing every other moncal ship to its imperial counterpart, the moncal shields are always better

if one moncal ship class has better shields it doesn't mean that all of them have better shields than imperial ships. and it is also said that ISDs armament was much better than that of an moncal cruisers. so I claim that Executor-class also has much better weaponary than viscount.

Scarecrow63 · « **Reply #44 on:** August 31, 2007, 05:02:30 PM »

You cant say its better, we know the armament of both, the only difference is the 50 missle tubes of the SSD and the 50 ions of the Viscount

And its not just one ship, every Moncal ship has better shielding than the imperial counterpart, why would the most powerful ship ever built by the MonCal be any different?

Meyer · « **Reply #45 on:** August 31, 2007, 05:04:43 PM »

money. they had to get something weak. and maybe imperial ships had better turbolasers than moncal ships.

Scarecrow63 · « **Reply #46 on:** August 31, 2007, 05:08:49 PM »

I doubt they would have gotten low quality because of lack of funds

And the guns of the two ships were different for sure, but i doubt the difference in power was enough to have an impact

Meyer · « **Reply #47 on:** August 31, 2007, 05:10:46 PM »

point taken. but that moncal shield was achieved by overlapping many weak shields together to achieve one strong. those shields weren't so much better than their imperial counterparts if they were better at all.

Scarecrow63 · « **Reply #48 on:** August 31, 2007, 05:11:40 PM »

But we know they do make a much more effective system, and overlapping or not, it doesnt matter, it still worked better

Meyer · « **Reply #49 on:** August 31, 2007, 05:14:45 PM »

but still ISD would beat moncal cruiser on ship-to-ship battle? I think that proves that those "amazing and very good moncal shields" weren't so good afterall.

Scarecrow63 · « **Reply #50 on:** August 31, 2007, 05:16:13 PM »

Only because an ISD had the better armament, and in the Viscount vs Executor battle, both their armaments would be the same

Meyer · « **Reply #51 on:** August 31, 2007, 05:16:59 PM »

well 50 more missile launchers are much more effective than an 50 more ion cannons.

Scarecrow63 · « **Reply #52 on:** August 31, 2007, 05:20:25 PM »

Not neccessarily, the missle tubes had limited shots, and the ion cannons would do better against the shields of a capitol cruiser

Meyer · « **Reply #53 on:** August 31, 2007, 05:48:28 PM »

well ISDII could stay operational after full barrage of Executors ion cannons and Executor had stronger shields so it would surely stay operational long enough to destroy that viscount after it had been shot by it's ion cannons. and those 50 missiletubes has a load of 30 missiles each. that is 1500 missiles that were meant to anti-capital ship duty.

Scarecrow63 · « **Reply #54 on:** August 31, 2007, 06:06:06 PM »

That only works if the Viscounts shields go down first, which is highly unlikely

sarcronis · « **Reply #55 on:** August 31, 2007, 07:15:00 PM »

No one is ever going to win this argument unless there is clear proof. That will probably have to wait for R2. Then we can have a single executer cs a single viscount with all of their fighters. Until then, no one is going to convince anyone else.

Scarecrow63 · « **Reply #56 on:** September 01, 2007, 12:05:03 AM »

I wouldnt take that as proof, neither would anyone else i doubt, games are to far from actual canon

Meyer · « **Reply #57 on:** September 01, 2007, 02:36:22 AM »

Quote from: Scarecrow63 on August 31, 2007, 06:06:06 PM

That only works if the Viscounts shields go down first, which is highly unlikely

Why wouldn't the missiles work?

Scarecrow63 · « **Reply #58 on:** September 01, 2007, 03:49:19 PM »

It doesnt really matter any way, 50 missle tubes or 50 ion cannons isnt going to make that big a difference in the fight, both armaments are way too close to really matter

Meyer · « **Reply #59 on:** September 01, 2007, 04:59:37 PM »

It seems that viscounts armament is copied from Executor. just added some ion cannons and removed fed conc.launchers.

Poll

Which one would win a battle?

Author Topic: Executor vs Viscount (Read 38535 times)