Author Topic: Suggestions for 2.1 (Read 282158 times)

Lord Xizer · « **Reply #320 on:** December 22, 2012, 12:10:05 PM »

the eoth does not need an ssd!

tlmiller · « **Reply #321 on:** December 22, 2012, 12:28:27 PM »

Even more than that, it has been pointed out mulitple times that the very idea of the core of the EOTH precludes the use of the SSD. Thrawn thought they were a waste of resources.

negativ21 · « **Reply #322 on:** December 22, 2012, 08:10:01 PM »

Could you add a galactic conquest exactly like from the ground up but with the Imps being at era 5 instead of era 3 the whole game. I realize era 3 is their best but it would be cool to be able to use the tector and venator and those later ships especially the Preybird.

Corey · « **Reply #323 on:** December 22, 2012, 08:13:48 PM »

We're probably going to do another FTGU style GC so we can add the PA with the PA in era 1, Remnant in Era 5 and the Empire of the Hand in era 2.

negativ21 · « **Reply #324 on:** December 22, 2012, 09:05:28 PM »

Awesome, and there's no NR

tlmiller · « **Reply #325 on:** December 22, 2012, 09:06:37 PM »

Ok, that would be cool.

Lord Xizer · « **Reply #326 on:** December 23, 2012, 10:43:24 AM »

will the AoW ever get all factions fighting at once again?(I.E. the Yevetha and Hapans being back in as NP factions in a battle royale?)

tlmiller · « **Reply #327 on:** December 23, 2012, 12:31:28 PM »

I can't see it being able to happen unless you wanted to have the freeze happen by week 60.

Lord Xizer · « **Reply #328 on:** December 23, 2012, 09:01:56 PM »

Sigh, true

Revanchist · « **Reply #329 on:** December 25, 2012, 08:02:56 PM »

Quote from: Lord Xizer on December 22, 2012, 12:10:05 PM

the eoth does not need an ssd!

Exactly. I don't know how many times the mod team has had to describe this, and it's getting pretty tiresome. On another note: you could give the Visvia the Deploy Squadron ability, so you could have the option to get more fighters on the field quickly (especially if you know it'll be destroyed).

Lord Xizer · « **Reply #330 on:** December 25, 2012, 11:32:17 PM »

Quote from: revanchist on December 25, 2012, 08:02:56 PM

Exactly. I don't know how many times the mod team has had to describe this, and it's getting pretty tiresome. On another note: you could give the Visvia the Deploy Squadron ability, so you could have the option to get more fighters on the field quickly (especially if you know it'll be destroyed).

I don't know, the Visvia seems to serve more of a cap ship killer role with the other EotH defense platform serving as a carrier.

Revanchist · « **Reply #331 on:** December 26, 2012, 08:05:05 PM »

Oops, I meant the carrier platform (thought it was the Visvia) is it the Brask?

Lord Xizer · « **Reply #332 on:** December 26, 2012, 08:27:27 PM »

Yes, it's the Brask

Eclipse · « **Reply #333 on:** December 31, 2012, 05:49:56 PM »

Talking of SSD is there a chance that the IR could choose between building the original Executor class and the Vengeance class? It just looks so cool and as some of them were with the empire according to the ICW manual.

And by the way I think the EoTH doesn't build turrets ( I mean the unique ones)

tlmiller · « **Reply #334 on:** December 31, 2012, 06:16:14 PM »

I don't think they would do it strictly out of canon reasons. To all I know of the Vengeance was just an Executor Jerec managed to have built with a different look, and it was a unique unit, no other Vengeance-style Executors were ever made.

Corey · « **Reply #335 on:** December 31, 2012, 06:18:32 PM »

They were, but they weren't common and they'd be completely redundant next to the Executor itself.

Revanchist · « **Reply #336 on:** December 31, 2012, 08:03:02 PM »

Quote from: Eclipse on December 31, 2012, 05:49:56 PM

Talking of SSD is there a chance that the IR could choose between building the original Executor class and the Vengeance class? It just looks so cool and as some of them were with the empire according to the ICW manual.

Quote from: Corey on December 31, 2012, 06:18:32 PM

They were, but they weren't common and they'd be completely redundant next to the Executor itself.

Very true, and it has a better feel to give it to just the PA so it can be both canon and unique.

Lord Xizer · « **Reply #337 on:** January 01, 2013, 01:53:36 AM »

only 3 Vengeance class SSDs were constructed. The first was Jerec's and the other two were built at Byss.

Singularity · « **Reply #338 on:** January 03, 2013, 06:42:01 PM »

Quote from: Lord Xizer on January 01, 2013, 01:53:36 AM

only 3 Vengeance class SSDs were constructed. The first was Jerec's and the other two were built at Byss.

We only know Palpatine used 3 during Dark Empire, we don't know if they built any more afterwards or if Jerec's was one of them.

There's not much point giving the IR the Vengeance, its just an Executor with a different model, but it can't hurt either I guess.

tlmiller · « **Reply #339 on:** January 03, 2013, 10:37:53 PM »

I say if you're going to, then just give them the Vengeance without the Executor. It's prettier anyway. :d