Total Members Voted: 45
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Fine, since no one else will, i shall give a reason to like Isard. She managed to kill the bumbling Imperial Ruling Counsel, who would have torn the Empire apart were it not for their death. She also gave Soontir Fel to Thrawn, where he served in the EotH.
Yes, because the Empire totally didn't fall apart regardless!
She ACCELERATED it by decades. She gave the rebs Imp Center, helped foment distrust among Imps in her power grab and did unreparable damage.
Except that the loss of Coruscant gave the Empire nothing to rally around. Without any sort of homeworld or central location to govern them, or any way for a successor to establish legitimacy by owning it..well obviously they fractured. Sure the New Republic now had to protect Coruscant, but it's still a massively important planet that legitimized the New Republics rule and likely gave them control of much more of the galaxy than before. Many worlds that were iffy on the New Republic before quite likely switched sides, and even most of the remaining Imperial Worlds were likely much less loyal than before. Maybe if the Krytos virus had been implemented as planned it would have been a worthwhile plan, but as is it was the single worst thing to happen to the Empire since Endor.
Well said. Her plan in order to work had to be 100%. Absolutely every detail had to be perfect and if anything happened out of her intended plan it all fell apart...which is what happened.
Always a foolish way to do a plan...but that is why Isard is...less liked, to put it kindly.
All right, I'll try one more time. Isard killed the ruling counsel, then she herself was "killed". If we assume that the council had the same hatred of non-humans that palpi did (a logical guess) and that Isard would be unwilling to share her power (another logical guess), then Thrawn would never have returned, and Pellaeon never would have become the leader of the IR, since he wouldn't have been trained by Thrawn, and thus would have been merely a "competent captain."I personally voted for Pellaeon. It was a tough call, but I chose him over Thrawn because of one key attribute that Thrawn lacked: Vision. Thrawn was stuck in the past, feeling that the Empire could be restored to its former glory, not realizing that the galaxy was fundamentally different with the loss of the Emporer. Pellaeon, on the other hand, realized that there came a point where you just have to stop. I don't think that Thrawn would have seen that though surrender might not be the only option, it can be the wisest.
As to Thrawn being obsessed with the past, he was loyal to the idea of Empire, not the Empire. He wanted the stability of the Empire over the bureaucracy of NR. In Spector of the Past Parrk even mentions he wouldn't be sure which side Thrawn would come down on when he returned as promised since Thrawn wanted order to prepare for the Vong. Pellaeon is actually my favorite EU character though, he's just very likable.
I guess what I mean is that he still had the ideals of the original Empire in mind, with a few modifications. He still believed that total order at the expense of freedoms was superior. While this worked while the Emporer was alive (and even then not for very long), in the post-Empire galaxy, it simply wouldn't work, no matter how hard one tried. The people would not allow it. That is what he didn't see: that the Empire could not be restored to its former glory, at least not yet. If I am correct, Pellaeon himself said something about this. I think it was something to the like of: if we keep fighting, we will lose, but if we can establish a peace treaty, at least the Empire will live and can rebuild. And one day, when the people are ready, we can return.