Those working on this mod do so in their own free time and for no pay.
Show your support for them by enabling ads on this site!

Author Topic: Super Star Destroyers  (Read 59428 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

August 11, 2007, 02:35:00 AMReply #100

Offline Meyer

  • Grand Moff
  • **********
  • Posts: 4,152
  • Approval: +69/-2
  • Do-ro'ik vong pratte!
    • View Profile
Re: Super Star Destroyers
« Reply #100 on: August 11, 2007, 02:35:00 AM »
And Executor-class SSDs were 19km long. I think that DSI wouldn't have been able to hit Executor with it's superlaser. But as sarcronis said there were thousands of other guns, turbolaser, ion cannons. But Executor was more mobile. It could have destroyed the weapons points of one spot and then say on that spot and fire upon it. I think that Executor would have won DSI.
I reject your canon and substitute my own!


August 11, 2007, 01:29:28 PMReply #101

Offline Scarecrow63

  • Former Mod Team Member
  • Moff
  • *
  • Posts: 1,891
  • Approval: +37/-30
  • In internet speak, vowels are the first casualty
    • View Profile
Re: Super Star Destroyers
« Reply #101 on: August 11, 2007, 01:29:28 PM »
And the DS1 had one shot before it had to recharge, i think it was close to a day
Isn't in the bath, he prefers the shower

August 11, 2007, 01:30:58 PMReply #102

Offline Meyer

  • Grand Moff
  • **********
  • Posts: 4,152
  • Approval: +69/-2
  • Do-ro'ik vong pratte!
    • View Profile
Re: Super Star Destroyers
« Reply #102 on: August 11, 2007, 01:30:58 PM »
yep. but That power was needed to destroy a planet. I think that they wouldn't have need the full power to destroy Executor.
I reject your canon and substitute my own!


August 11, 2007, 01:31:51 PMReply #103

Offline Scarecrow63

  • Former Mod Team Member
  • Moff
  • *
  • Posts: 1,891
  • Approval: +37/-30
  • In internet speak, vowels are the first casualty
    • View Profile
Re: Super Star Destroyers
« Reply #103 on: August 11, 2007, 01:31:51 PM »
If the DS1 could lower its power output, it wasnt designed for it
Isn't in the bath, he prefers the shower

August 11, 2007, 01:37:54 PMReply #104

Offline Meyer

  • Grand Moff
  • **********
  • Posts: 4,152
  • Approval: +69/-2
  • Do-ro'ik vong pratte!
    • View Profile
Re: Super Star Destroyers
« Reply #104 on: August 11, 2007, 01:37:54 PM »
wasn't it. then never mind what I said.
I reject your canon and substitute my own!


August 11, 2007, 01:39:11 PMReply #105

Offline Scarecrow63

  • Former Mod Team Member
  • Moff
  • *
  • Posts: 1,891
  • Approval: +37/-30
  • In internet speak, vowels are the first casualty
    • View Profile
Re: Super Star Destroyers
« Reply #105 on: August 11, 2007, 01:39:11 PM »
I dont know that it couldnt, im just saying its only purpose was for planets, nothing else was considered to be a target
Isn't in the bath, he prefers the shower

August 11, 2007, 01:41:54 PMReply #106

Offline Meyer

  • Grand Moff
  • **********
  • Posts: 4,152
  • Approval: +69/-2
  • Do-ro'ik vong pratte!
    • View Profile
Re: Super Star Destroyers
« Reply #106 on: August 11, 2007, 01:41:54 PM »
you are propably right.
I reject your canon and substitute my own!


August 11, 2007, 02:01:28 PMReply #107

Offline sarcronis

  • Vice Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 449
  • Approval: +8/-3
    • View Profile
Re: Super Star Destroyers
« Reply #107 on: August 11, 2007, 02:01:28 PM »
In a ssd vs ds1 i really don't know who would win.

August 11, 2007, 02:03:10 PMReply #108

Offline Meyer

  • Grand Moff
  • **********
  • Posts: 4,152
  • Approval: +69/-2
  • Do-ro'ik vong pratte!
    • View Profile
Re: Super Star Destroyers
« Reply #108 on: August 11, 2007, 02:03:10 PM »
SSD propably. Especially if it would be commanded by Thrawn.
I reject your canon and substitute my own!


August 11, 2007, 02:18:35 PMReply #109

Offline Scarecrow63

  • Former Mod Team Member
  • Moff
  • *
  • Posts: 1,891
  • Approval: +37/-30
  • In internet speak, vowels are the first casualty
    • View Profile
Re: Super Star Destroyers
« Reply #109 on: August 11, 2007, 02:18:35 PM »
But maybe only Thrawn, otherwise the DS1 would just overwhelm it with firepower and shield power
Isn't in the bath, he prefers the shower

August 11, 2007, 02:27:18 PMReply #110

Offline Meyer

  • Grand Moff
  • **********
  • Posts: 4,152
  • Approval: +69/-2
  • Do-ro'ik vong pratte!
    • View Profile
Re: Super Star Destroyers
« Reply #110 on: August 11, 2007, 02:27:18 PM »
I'm not so sure.
I reject your canon and substitute my own!


August 11, 2007, 07:53:41 PMReply #111

Offline Scarecrow63

  • Former Mod Team Member
  • Moff
  • *
  • Posts: 1,891
  • Approval: +37/-30
  • In internet speak, vowels are the first casualty
    • View Profile
Re: Super Star Destroyers
« Reply #111 on: August 11, 2007, 07:53:41 PM »
Taim & Bak D6 turbolaser batteries (5,000)
Taim & Bak XX-9 heavy turbolasers (5,000)
SFS L-s 4.9 laser cannons (2,500)
Borstel MS-1 ion cannons (2,500)
Phylon tractor beam generators (768)


Id say thats more than enough
Isn't in the bath, he prefers the shower

August 11, 2007, 08:07:00 PMReply #112

Offline sarcronis

  • Vice Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 449
  • Approval: +8/-3
    • View Profile
Re: Super Star Destroyers
« Reply #112 on: August 11, 2007, 08:07:00 PM »
That's the Ds1 firepower.  Dang.

August 11, 2007, 08:10:13 PMReply #113

Offline Corey

  • Mod Leader
  • Administrator
  • Emperor
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,520
  • Approval: +410/-80
  • Dream Crusher
    • View Profile
Re: Super Star Destroyers
« Reply #113 on: August 11, 2007, 08:10:13 PM »
Then you need to take into account radius and range. They would be evenly spaced around the gigantic station, so very few could shoot at one time.
I also have a YouTube channel where I talk about mod development and gaming, do tutorials, and Let's Plays. If you like the content, consider supporting it on Patreon


August 12, 2007, 11:20:31 AMReply #114

Offline Kratas

  • Chat Members
  • Grand Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1,073
  • Approval: +19/-38
  • "If my face looked like a squid, I'd be angry, too
    • View Profile
Re: Super Star Destroyers
« Reply #114 on: August 12, 2007, 11:20:31 AM »
i agree

August 12, 2007, 01:48:33 PMReply #115

Offline Scarecrow63

  • Former Mod Team Member
  • Moff
  • *
  • Posts: 1,891
  • Approval: +37/-30
  • In internet speak, vowels are the first casualty
    • View Profile
Re: Super Star Destroyers
« Reply #115 on: August 12, 2007, 01:48:33 PM »
Plus the 7000 starfighters and 4 strike cruisers
Isn't in the bath, he prefers the shower

August 12, 2007, 01:51:22 PMReply #116

Offline Corey

  • Mod Leader
  • Administrator
  • Emperor
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,520
  • Approval: +410/-80
  • Dream Crusher
    • View Profile
Re: Super Star Destroyers
« Reply #116 on: August 12, 2007, 01:51:22 PM »
I don't believe we're counting the Fighters, otherwise the Executor's could just do the trench run and it's not really the Executor and Death Star fighting.
I also have a YouTube channel where I talk about mod development and gaming, do tutorials, and Let's Plays. If you like the content, consider supporting it on Patreon


August 12, 2007, 01:58:02 PMReply #117

Offline Scarecrow63

  • Former Mod Team Member
  • Moff
  • *
  • Posts: 1,891
  • Approval: +37/-30
  • In internet speak, vowels are the first casualty
    • View Profile
Re: Super Star Destroyers
« Reply #117 on: August 12, 2007, 01:58:02 PM »
Okay, then take the DS1 shields into account, i mean it could create enough energy to destroy a planet, those shields would have been a liitle tougher than the ssd
Isn't in the bath, he prefers the shower

August 12, 2007, 02:07:56 PMReply #118

Offline Corey

  • Mod Leader
  • Administrator
  • Emperor
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,520
  • Approval: +410/-80
  • Dream Crusher
    • View Profile
Re: Super Star Destroyers
« Reply #118 on: August 12, 2007, 02:07:56 PM »
Yep. Thats why I said a few pages ago it would win assuming the DS1's shields were down.


also, I think this is straying from the topic.
I also have a YouTube channel where I talk about mod development and gaming, do tutorials, and Let's Plays. If you like the content, consider supporting it on Patreon


August 12, 2007, 02:32:49 PMReply #119

Offline Scarecrow63

  • Former Mod Team Member
  • Moff
  • *
  • Posts: 1,891
  • Approval: +37/-30
  • In internet speak, vowels are the first casualty
    • View Profile
Re: Super Star Destroyers
« Reply #119 on: August 12, 2007, 02:32:49 PM »
we're still talkin about ssds
Isn't in the bath, he prefers the shower

 

Those working on this mod do so in their own free time and for no pay.
Show your support for them by enabling ads on this site!