nebula sd. Vs mc90

[MasterXendrex]

Which ship do you prefer: the mc90 or the Nebula sd.?
I usually use a Nebula with mc80b instead, because I think they have more shieldpoints, is that right?
Offensive wise the mc90 seems to be ahead of the mc80b, but not much.
Which would you prefer for your fleet? Nebula or mc90?
The Neb is a hard hitter with really good shields(they should have more points then the mc90)
but a pretty expensive.
Squadron wise I would give the Nebula the win.
The mc90 has very good shields and is not as expensive, while having a good amount of fighters and bombers.

As a defensive(planet blocking)ship I would prefer the mc90
Offensive wise the Nebula.

[DarthRevan106]

MC90 is maybe the best destroyer overall.Not only is it less expensive then nebula its 1 pop less.MC80b is just tank, it deals no damage whatsoever.I find the nebula underwhelming.Its damage is meh it has strong shields and good fighter compliment but instead of paying 8k for a nebula i would pay 10 for a boarding shuttle and steal an alligance.A fleet like that would consist of an alligance a few mc90s a few coronas maybe some blockade runners and ofcourse some Endurances.YOu could argue that its better to switch up the mc90s for nebulas but i feel like the shield ability makes the mc90 a better tank.And honestly i dont see a difference in damage between those 2 ships.

[tlmiller]

Nebula overall is a slightly better ship IMO, but the difference in pop cost makes me take the MC90 every time.

[MasterXendrex]

I really would say it like that:
Nebula
Good shields
Weak Armor
Very good firepower

Mc90
Very good shields
Medium Armor
Medium firepower

While my fleet needs a hard hitter I always choose the Nebula over the mc90
My rn fleet looks like that
1 Nebula
3-4 endurance
2 mc80b
4 sachsen?
Sometimes 1 mc90

I really can punch through everything on medium, while I focus on fighters.