Those working on this mod do so in their own free time and for no pay.
Show your support for them by enabling ads on this site!

Poll

What was the best tank in WWII

Sherman
1 (14.3%)
Tiger
0 (0%)
Panther
5 (71.4%)
T-34
1 (14.3%)
Churchill
0 (0%)
King Tiger
0 (0%)
Cromwell
0 (0%)
KV-1
0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 7

Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: tanks in WWII  (Read 11541 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

August 11, 2007, 06:39:59 PMReply #20

Offline Scarecrow63

  • Former Mod Team Member
  • Moff
  • *
  • Posts: 1,891
  • Approval: +37/-30
  • In internet speak, vowels are the first casualty
    • View Profile
Re: tanks in WWII
« Reply #20 on: August 11, 2007, 06:39:59 PM »
Thats not it, the factories in perfect condition weren't built to produce alot in a little amount of time
Logged
Isn't in the bath, he prefers the shower
August 11, 2007, 06:41:13 PMReply #21

Offline Meyer

  • Grand Moff
  • **********
  • Posts: 4,152
  • Approval: +69/-2
  • Do-ro'ik vong pratte!
    • View Profile
Re: tanks in WWII
« Reply #21 on: August 11, 2007, 06:41:13 PM »
yes but mostly because allies bombed everything. railroads, factories everything.
Logged
I reject your canon and substitute my own!

August 11, 2007, 07:05:37 PMReply #22

Offline sarcronis

  • Vice Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 449
  • Approval: +8/-3
    • View Profile
Re: tanks in WWII
« Reply #22 on: August 11, 2007, 07:05:37 PM »
The bombings probably saved the allied armies.
Logged
August 11, 2007, 07:51:45 PMReply #23

Offline Scarecrow63

  • Former Mod Team Member
  • Moff
  • *
  • Posts: 1,891
  • Approval: +37/-30
  • In internet speak, vowels are the first casualty
    • View Profile
Re: tanks in WWII
« Reply #23 on: August 11, 2007, 07:51:45 PM »
Thats like saying the military won the war
Logged
Isn't in the bath, he prefers the shower
August 11, 2007, 08:06:11 PMReply #24

Offline sarcronis

  • Vice Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 449
  • Approval: +8/-3
    • View Profile
Re: tanks in WWII
« Reply #24 on: August 11, 2007, 08:06:11 PM »
Well it did.
Logged
August 12, 2007, 12:28:58 AMReply #25

Offline Mandalore-the-Inquizitor

  • Admiral
  • *******
  • Posts: 529
  • Approval: +9/-48
    • View Profile
Re: tanks in WWII
« Reply #25 on: August 12, 2007, 12:28:58 AM »
T-34
Was
the
best
Tank
in
the
war
it
was
the
best
ballenced between armor Fire power and speed and manuvarability
Logged
92% of teens have moved on to (c)rap. if you are one of the 8% who listen to real music, copy and paste this into your sig
August 12, 2007, 05:52:18 PMReply #26

Offline GrndAdmrlPellaeon

  • Chat Members
  • Grand Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1,319
  • Approval: +35/-35
  • Yub Squadron This (Replaced by ASG)
    • View Profile
Re: tanks in WWII
« Reply #26 on: August 12, 2007, 05:52:18 PM »
I would not use the word balanced, I would use all-around.
Logged
"No! Try not. Do, or do not. There is no try." Jedi Master Yoda

I hate the Yuuzhan Vong!

92% of teens have moved on to (c)rap. if you are one of the 8% who listen to real music, copy and paste this into your sig
August 15, 2007, 08:40:23 AMReply #27

Offline Meyer

  • Grand Moff
  • **********
  • Posts: 4,152
  • Approval: +69/-2
  • Do-ro'ik vong pratte!
    • View Profile
Re: tanks in WWII
« Reply #27 on: August 15, 2007, 08:40:23 AM »
Quote from: Mandalore-the-Inquizitor on August 12, 2007, 12:28:58 AM
T-34
Was
the
best
Tank
in
the
war
it
was
the
best
ballenced between armor Fire power and speed and manuvarability

I have to disagree. Panther had the best balance between armor, gun and mobility. Hell it could destroy T-34 from an distance of 1km. And Tiger could do that from 1.5km
Logged
I reject your canon and substitute my own!

August 15, 2007, 02:00:45 PMReply #28

Offline Scarecrow63

  • Former Mod Team Member
  • Moff
  • *
  • Posts: 1,891
  • Approval: +37/-30
  • In internet speak, vowels are the first casualty
    • View Profile
Re: tanks in WWII
« Reply #28 on: August 15, 2007, 02:00:45 PM »
The reason T-34 was so good because it had okay armor and weapons, good speed, but most importantly very easy to make
Logged
Isn't in the bath, he prefers the shower
August 15, 2007, 02:09:55 PMReply #29

Offline Meyer

  • Grand Moff
  • **********
  • Posts: 4,152
  • Approval: +69/-2
  • Do-ro'ik vong pratte!
    • View Profile
Re: tanks in WWII
« Reply #29 on: August 15, 2007, 02:09:55 PM »
so was Panther. problem in german tanks was the lack of fuel.
Logged
I reject your canon and substitute my own!

August 15, 2007, 03:35:03 PMReply #30

Offline Scarecrow63

  • Former Mod Team Member
  • Moff
  • *
  • Posts: 1,891
  • Approval: +37/-30
  • In internet speak, vowels are the first casualty
    • View Profile
Re: tanks in WWII
« Reply #30 on: August 15, 2007, 03:35:03 PM »
that was only a real problem in Africa and the late stages of the war
Logged
Isn't in the bath, he prefers the shower
August 16, 2007, 01:04:16 AMReply #31

Offline Meyer

  • Grand Moff
  • **********
  • Posts: 4,152
  • Approval: +69/-2
  • Do-ro'ik vong pratte!
    • View Profile
Re: tanks in WWII
« Reply #31 on: August 16, 2007, 01:04:16 AM »
yep. And Panther entered service in 1943. which is after Africa and is late war.
Logged
I reject your canon and substitute my own!

August 16, 2007, 10:16:18 PMReply #32

Offline Scarecrow63

  • Former Mod Team Member
  • Moff
  • *
  • Posts: 1,891
  • Approval: +37/-30
  • In internet speak, vowels are the first casualty
    • View Profile
Re: tanks in WWII
« Reply #32 on: August 16, 2007, 10:16:18 PM »
Good point
Logged
Isn't in the bath, he prefers the shower
August 19, 2007, 03:46:22 PMReply #33

Offline Raptor

  • Admiral
  • *******
  • Posts: 640
  • Approval: +15/-54
  • F-22 Raptor
    • View Profile
Re: tanks in WWII
« Reply #33 on: August 19, 2007, 03:46:22 PM »
yeah.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
 

Those working on this mod do so in their own free time and for no pay.
Show your support for them by enabling ads on this site!