Those working on this mod do so in their own free time and for no pay.
Show your support for them by enabling ads on this site!

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - GreyStar

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 ... 20
161
Discussion, Suggestions and Feedback / Why Bring the Mod Back?
« on: May 02, 2017, 06:39:57 PM »
A question on my mind is, what is the reasoning for ressurecting FotR? I'm guessing it's more complicated then "for lols and we needed new things to model."

162
Star Wars Discussion / Re: The New cannon is frustrating
« on: May 01, 2017, 10:19:06 PM »
Quote from: AdmrialThrawn2 on May 01, 2017, 09:25:16 PM
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/f2/20/7d/f2207dab69a41cb22756a4a6c0df35fc.jpg
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-6bh26gL3Fk4/UCME5d_8AQI/AAAAAAAAA_8/aB7QLpDTI_s/s1600/black+pp.jpg
http://thepoliticalcarnival.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/coincidence-i-think-not.gif
https://pics.me.me/walmart-empire-coincidence-i-think-not-admin-finn-swhub-14054258.png

Compare the first two images than read the next two.... I dont know why I see this as similar....
Is Disney telling us the First Order=SJWs?????? Hmmmmmm....
This cannon is frustrating....
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/66/c2/47/66c247251046607f8d407a63f562a61d.jpg

163
Discussion, Suggestions and Feedback / Re: Possible Republic Unit Roster?
« on: May 01, 2017, 05:24:30 PM »
True, in addition the two other Acclamator classes aren't exactly useful in EaW compare to Sins and it's expanded ability list. I guess the Clone Commando carrier could have Boss' face on it (lol no). Though I would argue the Acclamator Carrier subclass should be either combined with the Accalmator 2 (which it is more or less in ICW) or a visibly lighter ship with little to no guns on it.

164
Discussion, Suggestions and Feedback / Re: Possible Republic Unit Roster?
« on: May 01, 2017, 12:25:43 PM »
Plus there is the Acclamator Carrier subclass (156 starifghters, what) and the Acclamator Clone Commando Carrier subclass.

As a side note an expanded refit system in Ascendancy would be weird.

165
The Lounge / The Forum Broke
« on: April 30, 2017, 06:31:07 PM »
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=916710495&fileuploadsuccess=1

Something is not quite right here guys.

166
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: 2.2 Demo Feedback
« on: April 30, 2017, 12:39:56 PM »
Where is everyone getting Coronas?

167
Star Wars Discussion / Re: Disney Star Wars cannon? Or EU (Legends)
« on: April 29, 2017, 10:49:13 PM »
Quote from: HobbesHurlbut on April 29, 2017, 08:07:33 PM
Rogue One.
Depends on the person. On a cinemtatic level Rogue One was... Good. On a plot level, boring. There's an issue when the random Stormtroopers are more sympathetic then the main characters.

168
Ascendancy Discussion / Re: Debuffs
« on: April 29, 2017, 01:25:34 PM »
I see. Thanks. That does explain why whenever I look at an MC80 it doesn't say it has a 75% dodge chance. Well this answers all my questions.

169
Ascendancy Discussion / Re: Dummy Trade Ships
« on: April 29, 2017, 01:00:23 PM »
True, it was more or less a dumb idea I came up with. A joke idea, funny to think about, but bad to implement.

170
Ascendancy Discussion / Re: Debuffs
« on: April 29, 2017, 12:55:33 PM »
Thanks for the remark on Ionic Disruption (time to adjust my IR fleet construction...)

Looking at Degrading Systems for the MC80.

If user has less then 50% hull: Damage output: 50%
If user had less then 20# hull: Damage output: 25%

171
Ascendancy Discussion / Debuffs
« on: April 29, 2017, 10:20:18 AM »
So I'm confused on debuffing in Ascendancy. Let's take the Carracks's Ion ability for example. 5% Weapon cooldown period increase per attack per Carrack. So 20 Carracks gives a 100% weapon cooldown period increase. That doubles the amount of time per attack of the enemy.

But then I look at the Degrading Systems ability. At 80% health I think, weapon damage is set to 80% damage in red. But then at 50% health weapon damage is set to 50% in red. So... Does the higher the number mean the worse the debuff? If so does Degrading Systems somehow alleviate itself at a lower threshold?

172
News & Updates / Re: Pentastar Alignment 1.1 Overview Video
« on: April 28, 2017, 05:07:44 PM »
So what will the ship over a certain size begins credit cost limit be? Nebulon B's big enough? Or is it more towards Victory 2s and up?

173
Ascendancy Discussion / Re: Dummy Trade Ships
« on: April 27, 2017, 11:36:44 PM »
Not at all. I mean a completely new ship unit but it's visibly identical to a trade ship for the faction that builds it. It can carry starfighters and boarding parties and would primarily be used as sneak attacking ships for flanking / surprsing. Nothing could really ruin's someone's day as a bunch of Y-Wings blowing up military labs.

Granted I think I've heard of several ships desings that would probably be more interesting for regular combat.

174
Star Wars Discussion / Re: The New cannon is frustrating
« on: April 27, 2017, 08:11:03 AM »
Quote from: AdmrialThrawn2 on April 27, 2017, 07:21:21 AM
It is a shame aftermath over shadows the good storys like Lost Stars, Tarkin, And Thrawn
Btw what the hell are these New worlds in Aftermath like "ze" or something. Someone said they are gender neutral pronouns which I really hope isn't true since I believe you only have two genders.(I don't hate against those people who

Apologies for quote mangling but there's plenty of gender neutral pronouns. I don't really see what's wrong with them. For example:

Them, They, We, Us, You, I, Me.

175
Forum Games / Re: Last Person to Post Wins
« on: April 26, 2017, 09:22:20 PM »
I'mgoing to guess rage.

176
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: NR's Multi-purpose ships
« on: April 26, 2017, 12:35:33 PM »


Because it leads to shots like this.

177
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: NR's Multi-purpose ships
« on: April 26, 2017, 11:54:21 AM »
I prefer the TR / Rebellion model.

178
Star Wars Discussion / Re: The New cannon is frustrating
« on: April 26, 2017, 09:39:16 AM »
Quote from: HobbesHurlbut on April 26, 2017, 08:12:16 AM
The fact that the novelization outshined the movie version for RotS...massively....and I have read and watched both. So yes RotS wasn't that GOOD, but better than TPM. I rank Prequels the lowest of the SW movies though.

TFA was great to watch, I would rank it on the same level as ANH.
Because puns make great comedy during murder.
"We were promised a handsome reward!"
"Am I not handsome enough for you?" Totally the Darth Vader we want guys.
"Make sure not to choke on your aspirations director."
Quote from: HobbesHurlbut on April 26, 2017, 08:17:32 AM
That's not the main reason. The main reason is.....look at what channel did Disney put the newest Star Wars show Rebels on? Then look at what channel the Clone Wars show was hosted.... And to help you get hang of it, Disney do not own the channel Clone Wars was on.
I'd argue that it was cancelled because it was during the prequels considering how much original trilogy merch was on sale in the FTA hype train.

179
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: NR's Multi-purpose ships
« on: April 26, 2017, 09:35:39 AM »
It doesn't have any uniqueness in that state as it's just a Strike Cruiser with no ion weaponrey.

180
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: NR's Multi-purpose ships
« on: April 26, 2017, 07:00:29 AM »
Well let's just kill any unique qualities the ship has then.

As a side note is the only reason you two want the Assualt Frigate changed is because of the Dreadnaught's lore?

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 ... 20
Those working on this mod do so in their own free time and for no pay.
Show your support for them by enabling ads on this site!