81
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: ssd
« on: December 09, 2012, 07:44:03 PM »
It has to deal with the awful pathfinding system EAW/FOC has and how this system works with large ships. There is nothing we can do about it.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
82
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: Questions/Comments about 2.0
« on: November 26, 2012, 04:32:40 PM »
Nobody has even mentioned the costs let alone how the ship will be implemented. I wouldn't jump to conclusions about its tactical value in the mod before you use it ingame.
83
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: Suggestions for 2.1
« on: November 22, 2012, 01:19:14 PM »
I wouldn't begin to put a timeline on the release. Frankly this is the busiest part of the year for most of the staff due to University. It'll be done when it's done.
84
Sins of a Solar Empire / Re: Rebellion on Steam Sale
« on: November 22, 2012, 01:16:56 PM »
I kind of doubt it, Stardock has it discounted just because of their own Thanksgiving sale; not directly due to there being a Autumn Steam sale.
85
Imperial Civil War Tech Support / Re: Language issue
« on: November 18, 2012, 03:38:30 PM »
Go into your Imperial_Civil_War\Data\Text folder and rename MasterTextFile_English to MasterTextFile_Italian (assuming you have the Italian version of the game).
86
Imperial Civil War Tech Support / Re: I cant move any of my newly created ships!!!!
« on: November 16, 2012, 02:04:29 PM »
Basically after some point based on the numbers of units killed etc. the game just decides to give up on life and this "freeze" occurs where you can no longer control new units. Unfortunately it appears to be related to the hard-coding and no solution has yet be found within the modding community. It tends to occurs more in TR due to the increased activity that is present in our GC scenarios. You're pretty much out of luck for continuing that game.
87
Sins of a Solar Empire / Sins of a Solar Empire 1.1
« on: November 15, 2012, 06:41:10 PM »
So, the 1.1 update for SOASE just got released recently. You can check out the change log here: http://forums.sinsofasolarempire.com/436120
I'm personally quite happy about some of the Vasari changes; especially regarding the Orkulus star base. I'll also never complain about buffs to the Ragnarov
.
I'm personally quite happy about some of the Vasari changes; especially regarding the Orkulus star base. I'll also never complain about buffs to the Ragnarov
. 88
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: Anti-Vehicle Units
« on: November 15, 2012, 01:01:44 AM »
Ooops, I meant for my comment to be in the thread where you mentioned the Air Straeker. My bad.
89
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: Anti-Vehicle Units
« on: November 14, 2012, 07:15:32 PM »
Senza, have you installed hotfix 2 beta?
http://gutr.swrebellion.com/forums/index.php/topic,2800.0.html
http://gutr.swrebellion.com/forums/index.php/topic,2800.0.html
90
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: Suggestions for 2.1
« on: November 10, 2012, 10:37:39 AM »
We have zero intention of using unit models and skins from other mods. We like to make our our art assets for that.
91
Forum Games / Re: Last Person to Post Wins
« on: November 08, 2012, 08:59:13 PM »
Honestly, reporting doesn't do a whole hell of a lot except send us annoying emails. We see the spambot posts when we go on the forum; they're not that hard to pick out.
92
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: Suggestions for 2.1
« on: November 01, 2012, 07:29:57 PM »
Yeah except for the part where it wouldn't be just a simple copy and paste. It's a large amount of work for very minimal gains. At least you can look forward to Ascendancy where you can name your ships whatever you want.
93
Star Wars Discussion / Re: Disney buys Lucasfilm
« on: October 31, 2012, 10:36:42 AM »EDIT: 7) Disney only bought Lucas Film, not the same company that made EaW so I think we're safe on the mod front.
It's not Petroglyph that worries us when it comes to copyright enforcement since they have no jurisdiction over anything Star Wars beyond their own code/art assets; it's LucasArts/Film (LucasArts is now owned by Disney as well). They have every right to shut down all fan based material if they wanted. It wouldn't be the first time a company has shut down a mod over intellectual rights (ie. all BSG mods on ModDB, Halogen etc.).
94
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: Visual Bug
« on: October 26, 2012, 08:11:18 PM »
Does the mod run fine without the trainer?
95
Imperial Civil War Tech Support / Re: No AI
« on: October 26, 2012, 04:20:12 PM »
In that case enjoy the mod now that the AI should put up a bit more of a fight.
96
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: Suggestions for 2.1
« on: October 21, 2012, 11:05:40 AM »
Skimping out on a faction of dinos wouldn't do them much justice.
97
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: Suggestions for 2.1
« on: October 21, 2012, 10:33:47 AM »Are you sure Enc? I thought that was the video with you, Kalo and I that we didn't actually release because of certain reasons.
No suh,
Add the Ssi-ruu.
One fairly big issue with that is that modelling and animating dinosaurs isn't exactly easy. I think Corey would agree it's a bit beyond our current capabilities at least to the extent of the ground side of things.
98
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: Suggestions for 2.1
« on: October 20, 2012, 11:49:05 PM »
If you've been keeping up with our videos you'd know that one of the units that you listed is already planned to be in 2.1. 
99
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: Suggestions for 2.1
« on: October 19, 2012, 03:27:31 PM »
Doesn't really solve the whole problem of that it's an ugly ship that none of the team really likes.
100
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: Suggestions for 2.1
« on: October 14, 2012, 03:08:50 AM »
Take cover will not be re-added because the NR troopers don't have the anims for it .There would be a lack of balance between the basic infantry for the different factions.