Those working on this mod do so in their own free time and for no pay.
Show your support for them by enabling ads on this site!

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Tiel

Pages: [1] 2
1
Sins of a Solar Empire / Re: Is Sins of a Solar Empire worth buying?
« on: December 23, 2013, 03:11:39 PM »
I've played Sins for ~3 years before modding it for personal enjoyment, and since modding it have played it quite a bit as well, modded and unmodded. I got EaW when it first came out, played for 3 months, haven't played unmodded since the first 3 months it was out (save for about a week when FoC first came out and I played that unmodded). I haven't played EaW for personal enjoyment, modded or unmodded, since 2008. So no, it's not that I'm burnt out on EaW and haven't had the same amount of time to get tired of Sins. I've never liked EaW.

Then say that instead of declaring it a piece of shit all around because it doesn't suit your personal tastes. The game isn't perfect, to be sure, but imo it's miles better than SOASE; having played since the original.

3
Sins of a Solar Empire / Re: Is Sins of a Solar Empire worth buying?
« on: December 23, 2013, 12:36:15 PM »
Sins is definitely worth buying, and the point of the mod is to make it more worth buying. Multiplayer is especially fun. The biggest difference between EaW and Sins is that Sins is actually a good game, while EaW is shit. Sins basically combines GC and space battles into one continuous mode which works a lot better (you can have multiple battles at multiple planets going on at one time and zoom in and out between them). Sins doesn't have land battles, but EaW's land battles were pretty much unsalvageably bad to begin with.

Without the freeze EaW is a better game. Better pacing, better combat overall, and a setting that doesn't feel faker than the weapon blasts coming from ships (cough, cough).

You just haven't played Sins enough to get tired of it, is my guess.

4
News & Updates / Re: Leading to Release
« on: December 22, 2013, 07:05:15 PM »
Haven't checked in here in awhile. Glad to hear v2.1 is coming out soon. Happy holidays everyone.

Careful now, you might accidentally persecute someone with that kind of talk.

5
The Lounge / Re: Most likely cause of America's demise
« on: December 22, 2013, 06:46:55 PM »
I mean all of them. Republicans and Democrats.  There are people in Congress who have been there since the early 60s.  Their time of contribution has long since passed.  My family is Republican but we are starting to lean away from them, not towards Democrats we think they are stupid too nor the TEA partyers because they do not make any sense any more. I think it is time for the Imperial party to rise.

Ask japan how that worked out for them.

6
News & Updates / Re: Leading to Release
« on: December 22, 2013, 06:45:13 PM »
God, I just had the itch to start up EAW too. I'm gonna die this coming week waiting for release  :D

7
Star Wars Discussion / Re: Star Wars Empire at War "On Unity" ?
« on: August 06, 2013, 09:49:41 PM »
The page does list that "we need good models and designers at the moment" - TR has the former in abundance. Perhaps consider making a donation?

8
EaW and FoC Mods / Re: New Order mod
« on: July 15, 2013, 06:28:34 PM »
They don't know what they're doing! They don't know what good gameplay mechanics are...


Good gameplay mechanics is not putting every unit on speed.

9
Sins of a Solar Empire / Re: Rebellion on Steam Sale
« on: July 15, 2013, 06:06:01 PM »
75% off now at the swell price of ten dollars.

10
Welcome to the Boards / Re: Hi guys
« on: June 01, 2013, 09:54:33 AM »
Out of curiosity, what game mode do you play?

11
Sins of a Solar Empire / Re: Game Night
« on: June 01, 2013, 09:38:20 AM »
The arguments themselves are reason enough to join the Skype call. Very amusing.

13
Now, if EA has DICE Make the new Battlefront? Holy shit I'll be excited. And if we get another KOTOR Esque title because it was given to Bioware? Man, that'll be the fucking best. I don't know about you guys, but I am excited for the titles they might release.

I'd like you to take a look at a little game called Battlefield Play4free and tell me how you feel about it after an hour. It probably won't have as much meaning to you as you probably never saw the game before EA decided it wasn't pulling its weight, but..

Anyway, I confess I liked ME3 and didn't have much of a problem with the ending. If you want to see the reasons people do there's plenty of sources online concerning it. But that's Bioware. I imagine if they had their way it'd be over after 3, but instead EA's making them create 4, something that's indubitably going to go awful. It'd be sorta like Halo 4 where it's set after what was supposed to be the last game in the franchise, but without the commitment of the fans that worked within the company. That's not to say Bioware doesn't like its own story, but I can't imagine they'll feel any compulsion to put as much thought into it as the first three titles..

As for DICE making BFIII, I wouldn't have issue with that. Battlefront was originally a Battlefield ripoff in the first place (and objectively a rather poor one at that). What I do have an issue with is EA doing the publishing and making these stupid executive decisions that sacrifice the integrity of the game to pull some extra money in.

Lastly, KOTOR. You do realize TOR was made by Bioware, riiiight? (and apparently is the KOTOR 3 campaign) The game they had to go F2P just a year or two after release because subscribers were leaving in troves? They're unlikely to make any other Old Republic title while that's still bringing in revenue.

Justified pessimism is always better than blind optimism. Hop on chat sometime so we can yell at each other, eh?

@Corey

How so? The only recent blunder I can think of is Kinect Star Wars. We had 1313 coming out, as well as First Assault and Battlefront 3 if FA did well. I don't see how they're cashcowwy, either. Sure, there are a few stinkers like Republic Heroes, but they don't have any F2P titles (except for CWA, and that's Sony), they don't rehash the same thing every freaking year, they don't even make DLC for their games, for pete's sake! How could you possibly say that?

14
No, I shouldn't. My favorite game series come from Electronic Arts. Now I know it's the hip and cool thing to hate on EA because it's EA, but wait and see before you cast that judgement of yours.

I'm not hating on EA just for the sake of being 'hip'. I used to not give a flying crap who my games were coming from until I saw what a mess they've made in the past few years. I'd ask what game series you like that's published by them, because the general consensus is that most, if not all, recent updates to their IPs have been less than satisfactory. Command and Conquer 4. SimCity 5. Medal of Honor: Warfighter. Dead Space 3. Mass Effect 3 (wasn't bad persay, but clearly rushed)...and now 4 on the way (lord knows how they're going to pull that off), and lastly Battlefield, the upcoming fourth of which looks no different from the third. There's also their pathetic excuse for a Steam knockoff, Origin, that they now force anyone who buys games from them to use.

See, the purpose of a business is to make profit. I know that. But EA takes cashcowing to a whole new level, to the point where you get absolutely cruddy titles like Warfighter, utterly asinine decisions like the one to make the upcoming CnC an F2P, and blatant cashgrabs like their Play4free games. That's why I'm so distraught over them getting sole licensing rights. Just you wait and see, they're going to milk this as much as they can then toss it aside...and what then? They have sole. licensing. rights. No one else can make any Star Wars games.

Lucas might've been very detached from his community, but having the mantle given to such a disreputable company like Electronic Arts is much worse than mere inactivity. If I'm wrong, and it decides not to screw Star Wars up the bum like all its other series, then I'm wrong. But I find that extremely unlikely given their stellar track record over the past three years, and their seeming discovery as of late that people are willing to put up with microtransactions within retail-priced titles.

15
The Lounge / Re: good place for star wars roleplaying
« on: May 08, 2013, 03:08:44 PM »
Loathe free forums. If you can't set up one on your own you probably shouldn't be running one. (not referring to you specifically, just a sweeping assertion)

So are we doing the RP in this thread, or..? A TR roleplay actually sounds pretty cool.

16
I'm more concerned about them making Battlefront 3 and then pulling the s**t they did with BF3.

* Origin Only
* Purchasable weapons ingame
* Restrictive DRM
* Noticeable lack of modding tools
* Key concepts removed and replaced to accommodate COD kiddies
* Did I mention they want you to buy items in a game you've already paid full retail for? Because they totally do.

Lasers are red,
Ion bolts are blue,
I hate EA
You should too.

17
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: AI Moments of Glory
« on: May 05, 2013, 09:05:19 PM »


And NR is totally OP, they could probably send a CR90 against your SSD and still come out on top  -_^

18
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: Suggestions for 2.1
« on: May 02, 2013, 05:37:14 PM »
Wouldn't waves be preferable to one massive death-fleet that murders everything you throw at it?

19
The Lounge / Re: Post Your Desktop
« on: April 28, 2013, 08:55:22 AM »


edit: oh crap, month old bump xP

20
Star Wars Discussion / Re: Prank, or Reality?Star Wars Reclamation
« on: April 27, 2013, 08:34:30 PM »
I hope it's a prank. It looks like it will utterly devastate post episode VI canon...'Supreme Chancellor Mon Mothma', really? I don't get why these big budget studios can't just put their 'creative license' in the closet for an hour or two and just follow the damn timeline that's been given to them completely free of charge. TCW managed to pull it off pretty well, I'll give them that, but they still managed to screw up once or twice (ie: Barriss becoming a traitor and dying? The ***k?)

I think everyone would've been happy with a series centered on just the clones, those were arguably the best episodes (like the Umbara arc), but for some unfathomable reason the producers kept returning to the way, way, way overdone 'jedi plots', even if it meant butchering established canon in the process.

Somehow I managed to go off on a tangent here, but I really and truly hope Disney ditches this script and uses a book for Episode VII. Shadows of Mindor would be great. The series can follow up on that (as TCW did on its movie), exploring the adventures of Luke following his resignation from the NR military (such as The Jedi Academy Trilogy books), and then switching off to an original Jedi character, or heck, maybe even a firebrand like Kyp Durron. Him as a protagonist in the Sun Crusher crisis would be awesome, the viewer would get to experience his inner turmoil, and then his escapades following the incident. Perhaps even include the Yuuzhan Vong war! It would be a completely different perspective, that of Kyp's Dozen.

It could be great, but lord knows Disney's probably going to just try to make it TCW with Original Trilogy characters -_-

Pages: [1] 2
Those working on this mod do so in their own free time and for no pay.
Show your support for them by enabling ads on this site!