10
« on: December 02, 2007, 01:54:32 AM »
Ben says:
Why do you ask?
Corey says:
Cause I just did.
Ben says:
The intoverted answer implies a psychologal analysis of my prior remarks,
Ben says:
Do you confirm or deny this?
Ben says:
Are my allegations merely a shattered perception of the reality you have presented?
Corey says:
No
Corey says:
In fact
Ben says:
Or, are they seeded with a grain of truth?
Corey says:
They barely make any sense.
Corey says:
You just wanna use big words so you can try to confuse me.
Ben says:
Does the implications of the implied scare you?
Corey says:
WTF?
Ben says:
Indeed,
Corey says:
implications of the implied?
Corey says:
Double statement there...
Corey says:
anyways.
Ben says:
You are attempting to comprehend a situation to where the end does not complete the justifications of the irrelevent, resulting in a paradox of paradoxs where the beginning needs to follow the end of the end, wherein the middle is a neutral faction and the end is the end of the beginning as the beginning of the end. The factors of said pardoxial paradox result in the the equivalent of a division by zero, or the 'error' or 'infinite' in math, the resultant being bith too simple and too complex for your brain to understand, nay, the brains of all humans to understand.
Just goes to show how much win me and arbiter are made of.