Thrawn's Revenge
Off Topic => The Lounge => Topic started by: Isamu on March 26, 2008, 09:33:13 PM
-
which should be legal, which shouldn't, which are necessecary?
for me nukes are necessary,
biologicals should be destroyed,
kenetic energy weapons should be legal
-
well, you can disarm, but you can't disinvent something. nukes should have quotas and be available as a intimidation-style weapon, never to be fired.
bio weapons should stay illegal
what kinetic energy weapons are there?
-
nukes should be slowly gotten rid of.
Bio weapons should be destroyed along with any information pertaining to their creation/use
Kenetic energy weapons?
-
ideally, nukes should be banned. however, nukes can't be disinvented.
are knietic energy weapons those theoretiical ones like particle cannons?
-
IMO WMD's should be used as physical weapons, to scare people not to really use them.
-
nukes will never go away. the rods from god project is projectile weapons. google it
-
which country has biological weapons? I may be wrong but I have understanded that no country has any biological weapons officially.
-
which country has biological weapons? I may be wrong but I have understanded that no country has any biological weapons officially.
How do you mean biological weapons ?
-
well biological weapons. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_weapons check there if you don't known what it means. bacteria, viruses etc.
-
I think biological weapons are seriously in need of being disamred and disabled; they are dangerous and they kill eople in ways so atrocious it makes my blood run cold. Nukes actually destroy the planet bit by bit, and the more we use will eventually be the death of the world, and consequently us, and kinetic energy weaponry...I aint too sure. If it were in my opinion, all should be sealed away forever, and war made not with weapons as dangerous and volatile as they.
-
Iraq had it.
-
no they didn't. or maybe they're invisible? you're only so called justification on your attack to Iraq was a hoax. there was no weapons. but countries that DO have biological weapons are for example USA and Russia.
-
no they didn't. or maybe they're invisible? you're only so called justification on your attack to Iraq was a hoax. there was no weapons. but countries that DO have biological weapons are for example USA and Russia.
Saddam used it on the Kurds.
He got the biological weapons from USSR.
-
no they didn't. or maybe they're invisible? you're only so called justification on your attack to Iraq was a hoax. there was no weapons. but countries that DO have biological weapons are for example USA and Russia.
Saddam used it on the Kurds.
He got the biological weapons from USSR.
that was a long time ago. it happened in the 80s if I remember right. before many of us were even born.
-
no they didn't. or maybe they're invisible? you're only so called justification on your attack to Iraq was a hoax. there was no weapons. but countries that DO have biological weapons are for example USA and Russia.
Saddam used it on the Kurds.
He got the biological weapons from USSR.
that was a long time ago. it happened in the 80s if I remember right. before many of us were even born.
Yes, in the 80s. But that still counts that he had.
-
back then. that doesn't prove he had them in 2000 and after.
-
Are we talking about 2000 - 2008 ?
USA prob. took them during the Invasion.
-
Are we talking about 2000 - 2008 ?
USA prob. took them during the Invasion.
and took their evidence that they were right? in which case I would have no problem about the war. but now US intelligence looks really stupid.
-
Who didn't see this coming?
Locked*
*Cleared out the off topic posts. Guys, please stop insulting each other and dragging threads off topic.