Thrawn's Revenge

Imperial Civil War [Empire at War] => Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback => Empire at War and Forces of Corruption => Topic started by: Darth Dino on December 24, 2006, 01:17:30 PM

Title: FoC Review
Post by: Darth Dino on December 24, 2006, 01:17:30 PM
What did you think about Forces of Coruption?  I thaught that it was a 9/10 since it had really good gameplay.
Title: FoC Review
Post by: Chaosredsock on December 24, 2006, 03:16:04 PM
I can't run it :(  
Title: FoC Review
Post by: RedCommodore on December 25, 2006, 08:10:35 PM
I give it an overall 8/10...

Heres why:

Graphics: 8/10
Gameplay:7/10
Story:7/10
Balance:5/10
Thrawn-ness:10/10

 B)  
Title: FoC Review
Post by: Tyrant on December 29, 2006, 08:00:01 PM
the Thrawn icon wasn't all that great, although the Admonitor model is pretty cool. the TIE Defender was way overdone. the things a few squadrons of those fighters can do to a Rebel fleet
Title: Re: FoC Review
Post by: starwarslovr23 on January 14, 2007, 05:12:24 PM
I give it a 8/10 it was geat but not very balanced.   i.e. with a lv 5 space station, a keldabe, an agressor 2 interceptor 4s, a nebulo (space piracy yay :D)  and 3 crusaders, +garrison units, playing on hard i defeated, 7 ISD, Thrawn, Piet,Vader, an executor ssd, 5 victorysd, 11 acys, 5 tartans and a few ties couts and tie defenders.
 ;D
Title: Re: FoC Review
Post by: insanegolfer on January 16, 2007, 05:48:54 PM
The corruption side was way overpowered.  In space skirmish I could take out a level 2-3 space station with only two starviper squadrens.
Title: Re: FoC Review
Post by: Videoteck on January 27, 2007, 01:38:32 AM
The underworld is way to overpowed pretty much all around, empire is weaker than ever, rebels rule in land battles.

Lots of bugs when it first came out.

id say 7.5/10
Title: Re: FoC Review
Post by: Slornie on February 02, 2007, 06:37:08 AM
i quite liked it... there were some issues with the balance of the factions... but overall, i liked what it added to the game... so i reckon about 7 or 8 out of 10...
Title: Re: FoC Review
Post by: CBTS Demon on February 05, 2007, 03:17:51 PM
I liked it a lot
Could've let you build multiple SSD's though
Title: Re: FoC Review
Post by: Meyer on February 22, 2007, 03:50:22 AM
It wasn't so good I had hoped for. Thrawn was great thought. I'd give it 8.5/10.
Title: Re: FoC Review
Post by: Noret on April 17, 2007, 09:11:23 PM
i liked the new empire units but didnt like the new faction of "traitors" yes i know they are not techincaly traitors or not in the way the rebels are so 7.9/10
Title: Re: FoC Review
Post by: Meyer on April 29, 2007, 06:45:56 AM
Big problem in FOC is that rebel heroes like Bel Iblis, Yoda, Han and Chewbacca can alone concuer a planet against superior force. I mean I had 2 AT-ATs, 3 AT-STs and Stormtroopers and Han and Chewbacca destroyed them all.
Title: Re: FoC Review
Post by: SCPX on April 30, 2007, 03:27:40 PM
I thought Forces of Corruption did a good job bringing in a third faction without being too unbalanced. There were some problems, I admit, but they were the same problems the first one had.

8/10 (because I judge 9+ as heaven.)
Title: Re: FoC Review
Post by: Meyer on April 30, 2007, 04:18:46 PM
Rebel heroes are too good in my opinion
Title: Re: FoC Review
Post by: Slornie on May 01, 2007, 03:45:24 AM
well - they need to be good to balance the heavy equipment the Empire can bring to bear
Title: Re: FoC Review
Post by: Dr-Ludvig on May 10, 2007, 01:16:18 PM
i really like all the new gameplay features and such, and the new units of course, but i think the Campaing was WAY to short.... but i guess thats only me thinking that...
but all in all 8/10
Title: Re: FoC Review
Post by: insanegolfer on May 10, 2007, 01:37:02 PM
What irritated me was that in the campgain you couldn't capture all the planets.  The rebels still had one and so did the imps.  When I tried to attack them, it would say something like he was not ready to attack sort of bs.
Title: Re: FoC Review
Post by: Dr-Ludvig on May 10, 2007, 01:42:00 PM
yeah, thats annoying too,.. you just cant win without destroying everybody/thing!!!... i hope some mod will make that better!
Title: Re: FoC Review
Post by: SCPX on May 10, 2007, 02:12:52 PM
Maybe they did that to give hint of a sequel. The way the campaign ends implies a sequel is in the making...
Title: Re: FoC Review
Post by: Slornie on May 10, 2007, 03:03:32 PM
im sure they will do, in the fullness of time, when the current situation allows it...
Title: Re: FoC Review
Post by: Dr-Ludvig on May 10, 2007, 03:09:03 PM
Maybe they did that to give hint of a sequel. The way the campaign ends implies a sequel is in the making...
hmm, well maybe, it would be nice of they did!!!,... very nice indeed.. but aren't lucasarts concentrating on that Force Unleashed game?
Title: Re: FoC Review
Post by: Slornie on May 10, 2007, 03:11:42 PM
im sure they've got enough people to manage more than one project at a time (or i would hope so)
Title: Re: FoC Review
Post by: Dr-Ludvig on May 10, 2007, 03:14:43 PM
yeah, thats right, it just seems as if they are using all resources on that game,.. but what do i know?
Title: Re: FoC Review
Post by: Slornie on May 10, 2007, 03:20:46 PM
and they've got that recently announced one and the Indiana Jones game in production
Title: Re: FoC Review
Post by: Dr-Ludvig on May 10, 2007, 03:22:29 PM
ohh?,. well anyway i hope they got enough to make another expansion, that would be so sweet
Title: Re: FoC Review
Post by: Slornie on May 10, 2007, 03:27:16 PM
the new one is Fracture:
http://www.lucasarts.com/games/fracture/
Title: Re: FoC Review
Post by: Scarecrow63 on July 12, 2007, 02:11:51 AM
i just plain hate Garm Bel Iblis

And in GC the rebels attack my planets with fleets of like 30 bwiings, 50 assault frigates, and 40 MC 30s like every two days

heres the aftermath of one battle, doesnt even show fighters

http://s211.photobucket.com/albums/bb200/Scarecrow63/?action=view&current=WHOA.jpg
Title: Re: FoC Review
Post by: Raptor on July 17, 2007, 06:57:49 PM
Who is iblis? ???
Title: Re: FoC Review
Post by: Corey on July 17, 2007, 07:00:21 PM
General Garm Bel Iblis....
Title: Re: FoC Review
Post by: Raptor on August 02, 2007, 09:27:14 PM
I love the Gargantuan. Thats the only thing i like anout him.
Title: Re: FoC Review
Post by: Kratas on August 13, 2007, 05:45:12 AM
as soon as the gargantuans shields are down its a piece of junk
Title: Re: FoC Review
Post by: GrndAdmrlPellaeon on August 13, 2007, 08:56:39 AM
I cant stand how they gave Bel Iblis that and did not give him any Dreadnaughts or space units. He weould not have been able to wage his private war if it werent for them anyway.
Title: Re: FoC Review
Post by: lolzlolz on February 24, 2008, 11:40:36 PM
I personally like it and would give 9/10
i think it's pretty good, and balance gets better with each patch  :)
Title: Re: FoC Review
Post by: grandadmiralbeck on March 21, 2008, 10:33:58 PM
i thought this game was a lot like KOTOR 2, it had potential, and was overall a good game, but was rushed and was annoyingly non-canon in places.