Thrawn's Revenge
Imperial Civil War [Empire at War] => Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback => Empire at War and Forces of Corruption => Topic started by: Darth Dino on December 02, 2006, 06:48:18 PM
-
What thing do you play most? I'd choose skirmish since it's easier than trying to take over the galaxy.
-
I like campaign just because I like to conquer the galaxy in stages. ;)
-
Good ole' GC for me.
-
GalCon
-
Skirmish. I suck at GC... as certain people know well :ph34r:
-
Galactic Conquest. Skirmish is too short and boring
-
Galactic conquest. I like the long, drawn out strategies.
-
GC, Simply for the tactics on a large scale.
-
I like Galactic Conquest, becausse it allows a more complex game than just a single battle.
-
skirmishes for me. I like quick tactics and i'm also very,very,very,very,very,very,very impatient.
-
Galactic conquest because I like to go to tech 5 then roll over all opposition.
-
Oh, it shall be harder than that when we're done with it.
-
cool, can't wait
-
space skirmish is my favorite anyways.
-
i prefer GC, i dont like skirmishes because they are too short and dont have as much strategy in them (or the sort of strategy that i like) and the campaign gets repetitive...
-
The main problem with skirmish was the maps being so small. At least thats my opinon. There were others, of course.
-
Galactic Conquest cause I get to use the Death Star on those Wookiees and Ewoks :D
-
Galactic Conguest is the best. Space skirmish is good thought short
-
galactic conquest
-
it gives you many choices on how to proceed: attacking and killing quickly or waiting and building a fleet to minimize casualties
-
well....
if i have the time, i like a GC, but i never save a GC, and then continue later. so often it will just be a skirmish, space preferable
-
I mostly prefer space skirmish as the Galactic Empire since I love pumping out Tie afer Tie against the Rebels and I like the fact of being able to build during space skirmish battle because I like its flexibilities in tactics!! :laugh:
-
i like space skirmish but i hate land skirmish its just to slow and but overall i prefer gc cus i like hit and run tactics as the empire with vsds and with gunships as alliance they have to be the ultimate hit and run craft
-
Well GC is all I play, they take time true, I just save and come back to it later. a 90 planet galaxy map can take a while to conquer.
-
GC, I love hitting my opponent with hit-and-run tactics across the galaxy.
-
galactic conquest because it allows for change. never will you have the same thing happen twice.
-
Yeah. EAW is too repetitive unless you play Galactic Conquest, and it's more fun to have access to more units, destroy planets, take over planets, hire bounty hunters and smugglers, use all the heroes, etc. It adds strategy to the game, and it actually forces the player to think, whereas in skirmish it's just mindless spawning and attacking with no real purpose. And you can do so much in GC; spread corruption, steal stuff, steal credits, assassinate people, carry out missions, etc. It's so much more fun.
-
Yeah with random missions turned on its really cool as well, it mixes things up a bit
-
Yeah, but then again, FoC doesnt have that anymore. :-[
-
Easily fixable...
-
GC by far, it's less repetative than campaign, and you get better stuff than in skirmish, it takes a lot more cunning and strategy