Thrawn's Revenge
Off Topic => The Lounge => Topic started by: Meyer on August 18, 2007, 05:20:00 PM
-
Who killed JFK? and was there a conspiracy behind it?
-
Dont know, i think Oswald probably killed him but maybe not
-
oswald and no
-
i killed him bwahahaha, no ithink some unreveled person did it
-
I don't believe that Oswald killed him. And there was somesort of an conspiracy behind it. but how large I don't know.
-
I dont really know and overall dont care.
-
i dont really either although jfk was a good president
-
its was dora. dang illegals.
-
i dont really either although jfk was a good president
He was good. Reagan was better.
-
(http://www.archives.gov/press/press-kits/picturing-the-century-photos/images/reagan-at-durenberger-rally.jpg)
-
ohhohohoh ahahahaha
Don't quote posts right above yours, and never quote pictures.
-
Nice pic of Reagan, and oswald killed JFK and he was alone. The mafia and Cuba weren't involved.
-
Raptor, don't post large pointless pictures like that, and don't link to your hard drive for sig pictures. They have to be from a site.
[img ] Link here [ /img] without the spaces.
It's the exact same as posting a picture, just in your profile.
-
but oswald couldn't have possibly killed JFK. I don't know about cubans and mafia. I doubt their involment.
-
Why couldn't oswald have killed him?
-
haven't you seen Zapruder's film? Kennedy's head clearly moves back, not forward as it should if the bullet had been shot by Oswald from behind JFK. And I doubt Oswald shot any round from any weapon.
-
That movie is full of mistakes. If a person is shot in the chest, some times they fall forward. The same goes for getting shot from behind. The bullets also matched up with the type of round that the gun oswald had used.
-
The bullet entered from the back of the head
-
i dunt even know who jfk is
-
John Kennedy? Former president of the US during the Cuban Missle Crisis and such
-
but still in most of the photos shown the FBI presents wrong gun topublic. Oswalds gun Manliherr-Carcano or something like that, and FBI photos show us Kar98 and lee-enfield.
-
i saw the Italian rifle photos
besidex, you shouldnt be getting your facts from a conspiracy movie
-
hm cus movies are always madee so they can make money not present the truth
-
i saw the Italian rifle photos
besidex, you shouldnt be getting your facts from a conspiracy movie
I haven't watched any conspiracy movies.
-
Weren't you just refering Zapruders film?
-
I don't see that as a conspiracy film. It shoves the truth. that JFKwas shot from thefront.
-
Zapruders film was a conspiracy film, and it has hardly any truth. Except JFK got shot and he was the president.
-
All it shows is Kennedy gettin shot and then him telling you what happened because 'he knows'
-
I knowwhat I saw. And I saw that kennedy was shot from front.
-
The entry wound was from the back. Prior to 9/11, the JFK assassination was the most talked about conspiracy ever. The film was to make money. To do that it appealed to people looking for a historical film and people looking for a conspiracy film.
-
how can yousay wherethe entry wound was when one quarter of his head was blown off. the where he was shot.
-
I am pretty sure this is going to degenerate into spamming. But forensic evidence points to only one shooter. And it is likely for him to have gotten 3 shots off. Oswald was a former marine corp sniper.
-
let's hope it is notgoing to spamming. but wasn't oswald only mediocre shooter?
-
Mediocre for a marine corp sniper is plenty for the distance he was at
-
could be but remeber that his vision was blockedby a tree. onlyway for oswaldto have been able to kill JFK is that you believe in singlebullet theory. And if you believe it you are stupid. I hope that those words don't insult someone
-
There were 3 shots.
-
three bullets couldn't have done all those wounds. only way to explain them is the singlebullet theory. and that is bullshit.
-
That last post was so self-contradictory i dont know what to say
-
how is it self contradictrory? there where more than three bullets. and that is stated by several witnesses.
-
You said it couldnt be done one way, only another way and then you said that way was bullshit too
-
ah sorry. I was trying to say that if only threebullets were shot and responsiblefor all the damage, you would have to believe the single bullettheory. And I find it very stupid theory.
-
that makes more sense
-
thatwas my mistake. my english ain't that good you know.
-
I know, i didnt get mean like others might have *cough* raptor *cough*
-
and I thank you for your patience for not just come and say that all of that was wrong and whateverhe might say.
-
I am rather amazing arent i?
-
yep. you are, You are one of those handful of ameicans I respect.
-
Score, im respectable
-
What about me, do you respect me?
-
i doubt he respect us but i respect him
-
Sarconis and MTI are above the average americans in my opinion.
-
Thank you, but we should get back on topic.
-
yep. who here believes in single bullet theory?
-
I know I heard about it, but I can't remember what it is.
-
search on wikipedia
-
its bull shit
-
wikipedia or he single bullet theory?
-
single bullet theroy my freind
-
yep. that can't be true.
-
any one whith a brain cant possibly belive that
-
and the single shooter theory is only said to be possible if you believe the single bullet theory.