Thrawn's Revenge

Off Topic => The Lounge => Topic started by: Meyer on July 27, 2007, 07:48:38 PM

Title: NATO
Post by: Meyer on July 27, 2007, 07:48:38 PM
Is NATO a relic from the Cold War? Or is it good that it still exist?
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Scarecrow63 on July 27, 2007, 11:57:28 PM
I think its a relic, i think the UN should do fine
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Meyer on July 28, 2007, 02:32:47 AM
I personally think that NATO is good to be, because I think it prevents large scale wars to happen again.
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Scarecrow63 on July 28, 2007, 11:30:47 PM
Sure but i think the UN could do a better job for everyone, not just NATO countries
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Kratas on July 29, 2007, 08:15:32 AM
ive never heard of it before what does it stand for?
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Meyer on July 29, 2007, 11:55:46 AM
UN? United Nations
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Noret on July 29, 2007, 12:21:38 PM
i think he meant NATO=North Atlantic Treaty Organization(plus australia :P)
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Meyer on July 29, 2007, 01:05:39 PM
and Japan
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Noret on July 29, 2007, 01:14:03 PM
wait japan's in NATO?
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Raptor on August 03, 2007, 11:07:57 PM
I dont think so.
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Meyer on August 04, 2007, 03:19:56 AM
yep it ain't. but neither is Australia.   But my opinion is that it would be the best for Finland if we would join NATO. Wouldn't have to fear attacks anymore.
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Raptor on August 04, 2007, 11:44:26 AM
attacks from who?
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Meyer on August 04, 2007, 11:48:32 AM
traditionally attacks to Finland come from east. or if it comes from west the enemy has gone around the globe. and who is the east neighbour of Finland?
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Raptor on August 04, 2007, 01:21:26 PM
Mother Russia.
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Meyer on August 04, 2007, 02:27:34 PM
Big fucking WRONG. It is the FuckingCommunistRussia and those bastards who run that country. USA should have destroyed them in the Cold War.
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Raptor on August 04, 2007, 04:55:40 PM
So now your on our side. 8)
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Meyer on August 04, 2007, 05:44:08 PM
I have always been on the side of Finland and those who oppose Communism.
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Mandalore-the-Inquizitor on August 05, 2007, 12:48:00 AM
communism i oppose but dont say oe bad thing aginst my mother land her peapole and her leaders are 2 differnt things
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Raptor on August 05, 2007, 01:03:46 AM
my uncles from Russia. And i agree with M-t-i
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Meyer on August 05, 2007, 04:42:47 AM
there has never come nothing good from the east. Communis and Russia are sicknes and they must be cured quickly before the spread.
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Mandalore-the-Inquizitor on August 05, 2007, 09:49:48 AM
look iv have three uncles from russia and my great granda from russia all of them hate communism as does all my family
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Meyer on August 05, 2007, 10:13:03 AM
Were they nobles? I mean many noble fled russia when communists took over. But still Russia and communists especially have always tried to invade Finland. It's only a matter of time before they try it again.
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Scarecrow63 on August 05, 2007, 10:13:38 AM
And wouldnt it be nice to have the world police come save you?
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Mandalore-the-Inquizitor on August 05, 2007, 12:33:30 PM
you dont think the u.s. would have your back ;)
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Meyer on August 06, 2007, 03:57:33 AM
And wouldnt it be nice to have the world police come save you?

Hell, help from USA is always good. I just hate the fact that you think you have the right to do whatever you want. But if you ever attack russia I'm pretty sure that many people in Finland would be happy and would gladly join you war against them.
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Scarecrow63 on August 06, 2007, 04:25:51 PM
Well i dont see that happening, although Russia hasnt been very cooperative as of late
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: sarcronis on August 06, 2007, 10:05:24 PM
While this board has gotten off topic, I think that NATO should still be around because the UN doesn't do anything.  In my opinion they are afraid to fight.  I also hate communism with  passion , but I find Russia ok now.
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Meyer on August 07, 2007, 02:23:29 AM
Everybody who hates communism and russia is a good man.
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Kratas on August 07, 2007, 12:49:32 PM
i hate communisim but i dont hate russia although i used to
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Noret on August 07, 2007, 01:10:26 PM
why does everyone hate Communism its actually not that bad of an idea when used correctly but it never is...
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Scarecrow63 on August 07, 2007, 03:41:14 PM
Which is why everyone hates it, its an impossible system, everything in it works except the human part
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Meyer on August 08, 2007, 03:41:45 AM
why does everyone hate Communism its actually not that bad of an idea when used correctly but it never is...

Communism doesn't work. If all are eguals I could just go to decide state business even if I'm only simple farmboy.
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Mandalore-the-Inquizitor on August 08, 2007, 05:24:53 AM
Cmmunism will never work whith humans
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Meyer on August 08, 2007, 06:20:02 AM
that is true.
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: sarcronis on August 08, 2007, 12:21:14 PM
it would only work if even the leaders were as convinced in equality as the people that they brainwashed.
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Meyer on August 08, 2007, 12:28:19 PM
Which will never happen.
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: sarcronis on August 08, 2007, 12:35:36 PM
that's true.  If one set of leaders actually believed it, they would be assassinated.
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Meyer on August 08, 2007, 12:40:06 PM
yep. that is also true.
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: sarcronis on August 08, 2007, 12:41:42 PM
stupid stupid commies.
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Meyer on August 08, 2007, 12:42:33 PM
That's why communism lost the Cold War.
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: sarcronis on August 08, 2007, 12:45:30 PM
and why there are only a few, power crazed countries left with it.  Most have delusions of grandeur.
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Meyer on August 08, 2007, 12:48:48 PM
that will never come true.
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: sarcronis on August 08, 2007, 12:49:31 PM
yes and the world is better without them coming true.
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Meyer on August 08, 2007, 12:59:38 PM
you got that one right.
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Raptor on August 08, 2007, 11:33:31 PM
We get it, you dont like communism, i hate it too, lets talk about something new.
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Meyer on August 09, 2007, 02:15:53 AM
Well how could NATO improve itself?
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: sarcronis on August 09, 2007, 06:35:02 PM
I think that NATO could take more action in world affairs.
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Meyer on August 10, 2007, 02:02:15 AM
yep. more NATO action and less USA action.
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: GrndAdmrlPellaeon on August 10, 2007, 10:07:20 AM
Yes, be nice if USA did not have to do NATO's job anymore, but someone has to do it.
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Meyer on August 10, 2007, 10:10:56 AM
I meant that NATO should act more and USA should stop acting solo like in the war of Iraq. Many NATO countries didn't want to go to war. If NATO would police the world I think it would be much better than the fact that USA is the world police alone.
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: GrndAdmrlPellaeon on August 10, 2007, 10:12:37 AM
I agree with you on that, if NATO did something than the USA would not have to.
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Meyer on August 10, 2007, 10:13:33 AM
yep and I think that not so many people would hate the fact on how USA acts.
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Raptor on August 10, 2007, 10:52:25 AM
What do you mean by "act"?
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Meyer on August 10, 2007, 11:21:36 AM
declare wars just like that. What justified your war in Iraq?
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Kratas on August 10, 2007, 02:18:56 PM
I meant that NATO should act more and USA should stop acting solo like in the war of Iraq. Many NATO countries didn't want to go to war. If NATO would police the world I think it would be much better than the fact that USA is the world police alone.
The UK also fought in iraq and still in
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Raptor on August 10, 2007, 03:06:57 PM
declare wars just like that. What justified your war in Iraq?

We declared war to keep the home front safe. So dont start that. I dont see Finland doing anything to end radical Islam. ANd to Arb and Meyer, Canada and Finland both use our aircraft.
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Corey on August 10, 2007, 03:19:24 PM
We use some american designs... If it wasn't for Diefenbaker cancelling the Arrow project because the Americans sold us the Bomarc missiles (Thank your government for those by the way- they didn'twork.) we would still have the Arrows, and most likel the design would have been improved even more in the decades since then. Instead we got Voodoos. Hurray.
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Raptor on August 10, 2007, 03:21:12 PM
you use our F-18's.
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Corey on August 10, 2007, 03:27:20 PM
I am aware of that.
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Raptor on August 10, 2007, 03:52:32 PM
so you are dependent on us.
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Corey on August 10, 2007, 04:05:52 PM
No. We buy planes from you that are inferior to the ones our government destroyed because the Americans sold us shitty missiles. Theres a difference between buying some planes and being dependant on a country. We depend on the Americans for money too much, though.
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Scarecrow63 on August 10, 2007, 09:08:11 PM
They're not inferior planes, US jets are the best in the world, only competition is the European Unions newest ones

And just because Canada buys our planes, doesnt make them dependant on us, i doubt Canada would cease to exist if they never had an f-18
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Corey on August 10, 2007, 09:12:28 PM
The Avro Arrow was, I'm 90% sure, a superior plane. It's speeds topped Mach 2. (MAking it good for hitting anything that wanted to blow up Ottawa or Toronto. Theres no point blowing up any other cities except Vancouver and Calgary, really)
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Scarecrow63 on August 10, 2007, 09:17:05 PM
It still didnt have the capabilities offered with the F-18

The arrow was designed as an interceptor, while the F-18 could also hit ground targets
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: sarcronis on August 10, 2007, 10:40:36 PM
I think that the United States and Canada should become one country.  That would solve the military problem.
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Corey on August 10, 2007, 10:41:16 PM
There is no military problem (I'm pretty sure no to few countries want to go to war with Canada). and I'd rather we didn't get their national debt,and  have to share our food and other resources with them (The states getting a hold of all of Alberta and the territories oil won't help reduce the American dependance on oil either). Also, since theres 300 million of them and 33 million of us, it would end up with us just being another state. I REALLY don't like that idea.
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: sarcronis on August 10, 2007, 10:46:41 PM
I see your point and withdraw my suggestion.
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Raptor on August 10, 2007, 10:56:57 PM
The F-18 was a fighter bomber.
Title: Re: NATO
Post by: Corey on August 10, 2007, 11:39:26 PM
Locked. These debates just go in circles and result in certain people flaming certain other people.