Post reply

Topic Summary

Posted by: kucsidave

« on: June 02, 2016, 03:46:27 PM »

Insert Quote

Quote from: capshades on June 01, 2016, 02:19:33 AM

No shit Sherlock.

You don't have to be vulgar dude.
In other news he highlighted it because it can't be went around at the moment. if you can't destroy something by bombardment and you use a massive bombardment... surprise, you won't destroy it and it will regenerate both health, population and therefore income. Just as the scripts tell a planet not at full health to regenerate it.

Posted by: capshades

« on: June 01, 2016, 02:19:33 AM »

Insert Quote

No shit Sherlock.

"Lastly, I want to contradict what I said earlier and address a specific bug (and also one of the major features of the 1.83 patch as far as modders are concerned). This is the issue where Starbases can sometimes prevent the Galaxy Gun from destroying actually a planet- we're working on a fix for this."

Thank you Corey.

Posted by: Mat8876

« on: May 01, 2016, 04:36:37 AM »

Insert Quote

The answer is in the description "Starbase is preventing the loss of ownership by bombardment".

Posted by: capshades

« on: May 01, 2016, 12:51:06 AM »

Insert Quote

Not sure if this is a preventable bug on your part, but I hit this planet with the galaxy gun, and not only do the rebs still have it, it's still got a nice 1000 person taxable planet: