Those working on this mod do so in their own free time and for no pay.
Show your support for them by enabling ads on this site!

Post reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 100 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:
Verification:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What is the name of the planet we live on? Type it backwards then add a 5.:
Who is taking revenge? (lowercase):

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: DarthRevansRevenge
« on: December 08, 2016, 11:03:27 AM »

I doubt it. if they tried 3 times already to make it and failed, I don't think they will try a fourth. then again, I might be wrong, but I personally would just use the best model they have made in 2.2, instead of make a new one
Posted by: Bucman55
« on: November 16, 2016, 06:57:36 PM »

Since it's gonna be in 2.2 is it gonna get a model or a skin upgrade?
Posted by: tlmiller
« on: October 27, 2016, 12:41:26 AM »

Quote from: Kyle-Katarn67 on October 27, 2016, 12:10:09 AM
The RSD isn't THAT ugly.  I find it quite unique.  I hope that it stays a separate unit from the MC80B.

I do think it's unique, but I'll disagree as I think it's one of the ugliest designs in all of star wars canon.  Even the Invincible Dreadnaught is better looking than the RSD.
Posted by: Kyle-Katarn67
« on: October 27, 2016, 12:10:09 AM »

The RSD isn't THAT ugly.  I find it quite unique.  I hope that it stays a separate unit from the MC80B.
Posted by: Slornie
« on: October 21, 2016, 04:26:13 PM »

Quote from: Corey on October 21, 2016, 02:19:19 PM
We've also already said we're putting it back in 2.2
We're using Jason Fry's almost-canon "the RSD and the MC80B are actually the same ship" thing, right?
Posted by: StarBornMichaelh165
« on: October 21, 2016, 03:10:54 PM »

Quote from: kucsidave on October 21, 2016, 08:25:10 AM
you start to open up a year old thread too? There is a big red warning sign for threads not written into in 3 months.
And if you want it, you can have it in Vulcanus' balance anf flavor submod.
Yeah Sorry about I just like the Ship but I'll be more careful for now on in opening year or years old threads ok.
Posted by: Revanchist
« on: October 21, 2016, 02:20:13 PM »

Quote from: Corey on October 21, 2016, 02:19:19 PM
We've also already said we're putting it back in 2.2

It will win battles purely by the ugly factor.
Posted by: Corey
« on: October 21, 2016, 02:19:19 PM »

We've also already said we're putting it back in 2.2
Posted by: kucsidave
« on: October 21, 2016, 08:25:10 AM »

Quote from: StarBornMichaelh165 on October 20, 2016, 08:21:39 PM
Nice I would love To use The Ship in mod.
you start to open up a year old thread too? There is a big red warning sign for threads not written into in 3 months.
And if you want it, you can have it in Vulcanus' balance anf flavor submod.
Posted by: StarBornMichaelh165
« on: October 20, 2016, 08:21:39 PM »

Quote from: Camellia on May 10, 2015, 09:14:52 PM
I know the New Republic has the Nebula class, but it and the Endurance look so much alike its a little annoying to anyone?

The Republic Class Star Destroyer was a Rendili Stardrive design for the New Republic that came before the Nebula class. I'm new and not sure how the forums work really, but this is a place to make suggestions right? So what if this was a Republic Cruiser alongside/in place of/or a placeholder an Era before the Nebula class comes in?

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Republic-class_Star_Destroyer
Nice I would love To use The Ship in mod.
Posted by: Corey
« on: May 11, 2015, 11:27:59 PM »

And then chewed gum at Willy Wonka's chocolate factory.
Posted by: tlmiller
« on: May 11, 2015, 11:18:18 PM »

While I agree it's nice that it's a little different, canon pictures make it look like a star destroyer and a mon calamari cruiser mated, had a child, and that child is sick and has boils all over the body.
Posted by: Camellia
« on: May 11, 2015, 09:49:38 PM »

Idk I think its relatively interesting in design personally, maybe because its just not another triangle.

X__X
Posted by: Corey
« on: May 11, 2015, 07:11:36 PM »

We with few exceptions make our own models, almost no other EaW mod does. I'm assuming the one you're talking about is the Warlords model since almost every other mod is just some compilation of Warlords and now Warb Null models, in which case it's not actually an accurate model. We don't need the RSD in the mod since it's as similar as it is to the NSD, its concept looks uglier, and the 3 tries we've made to stay true to the design haven't turned out well. If we wanted to deviate as much as the Warlords model does, we'd just design our own which essentially just means we're making up an entirely new ship and just using the name, but again, no need to do that when the NSD exists. We considered it for Ascendancy for a while, and may consider it again in the future since we may need a new capital ship for them and it's easier to play around with values in Ascendancy than it is with the system we use for ICW, especially with abilities. The design is just so irredeemably bad.

We were nearly saved from the pain this ship has caused us by the Essential Guide to Warfare, in which the RSD and MC80B were almost retconned as the same ship but unfortunately that didn't happen...
Posted by: Camellia
« on: May 11, 2015, 06:39:40 PM »

Nvm I see it is, and gosh is that model not like the others. you say you use a lot of old ones, have you seen the one used in the Legacy Era mod? (I thought they were gonna put out new content a while ago but it seems they went dark)
Those working on this mod do so in their own free time and for no pay.
Show your support for them by enabling ads on this site!