Posted by: Slornie
« on: October 02, 2007, 08:03:49 AM »I dont know that what i think i know is history hasnt been tampered with. But if it has been tampered with, whatever did happen still happened, i just dont know that it happened 
Posted by: Meyer
« on: October 02, 2007, 12:26:17 AM »well how do you that those things you right now take as an truth aren't a piece of altered history.
Posted by: Scarecrow63
« on: October 01, 2007, 03:10:00 PM »I was talking physical monuments and areas and suchs
Posted by: Slornie
« on: October 01, 2007, 02:07:21 PM »Thats only changing the record of history, what actually happened stays the same..
Posted by: Meyer
« on: October 01, 2007, 01:38:31 PM »yes it can. it's called altering the records.
Posted by: Slornie
« on: October 01, 2007, 01:04:35 PM »Soldiers originally came out of the civilian population, natural resources comes under environment.. But only physical reminders of the past can be destroyed, history itself cannot be touched.
Posted by: Scarecrow63
« on: October 01, 2007, 10:24:46 AM »not to mention historic stuff and natural resources
Posted by: Meyer
« on: October 01, 2007, 09:54:02 AM »how about soldiers?
Posted by: Slornie
« on: October 01, 2007, 03:43:15 AM »At the cost of international stability, civilian populations and the environment..
Posted by: Meyer
« on: October 01, 2007, 12:39:22 AM »yep. war does boost economy but at what cost.
Posted by: GrndAdmrlPellaeon
« on: September 30, 2007, 10:01:40 PM »Although I dont agree with him, M-t-I has a point: the US came out of a depression because of WWII.
Posted by: Scarecrow63
« on: September 30, 2007, 06:00:01 PM »Oh yeah, i see what you mean, i mean look at Russia's economy after WW2, or better yet how bout Germany
And the fighting hasn't ever stopped between countries, i dont see how it would after WW3
And the fighting hasn't ever stopped between countries, i dont see how it would after WW3
Posted by: Mandalore-the-Inquizitor
« on: September 30, 2007, 05:58:24 PM »Old contrys die new one rise and are stronger and war helps the ecomemyof all sides involed With all the prodution it makes the peapole Of the country closer and eventally they stop fighting and trebuild a better stronger world
Posted by: Scarecrow63
« on: September 30, 2007, 05:56:05 PM »You're right, without superweapons, there wouldn't be another cold war, they'd just go attack each other cause they have nothing to fear
And war may have helped in the past a few hundred years ago, but nowadays it wont help, only hurt, there aren't any more colonies or unclaimed land, everybodys got their own country now so the only thing war would do is kill off countries, not help new ones
And war may have helped in the past a few hundred years ago, but nowadays it wont help, only hurt, there aren't any more colonies or unclaimed land, everybodys got their own country now so the only thing war would do is kill off countries, not help new ones
Posted by: Mandalore-the-Inquizitor
« on: September 30, 2007, 05:52:48 PM »and u still dont look far enough ahead another cold war could not happen with out diterrance aka nukes Or super weapons im talking All possible super weapons and if you dont think war helps contry then i ask Are u on drugs Look at america It would not exist without war
France would Own Britan WIthout war And Look at the us and russia from allys to ememy to allys
BRitan and france emeys to allys it all dependes on circumstance mabey you should Try to imagne wat we would be without war and youll see my point
M-T-I
Peace
France would Own Britan WIthout war And Look at the us and russia from allys to ememy to allys
BRitan and france emeys to allys it all dependes on circumstance mabey you should Try to imagne wat we would be without war and youll see my point
M-T-I
Peace