Posted by: Corey
« on: July 31, 2018, 03:37:38 PM »It could be, but we don't want it to be. Most of it would stop making sense or become a lot more complicated for basically no reward, gameplay-wise.
Posted by: Decepticon141
« on: July 31, 2018, 10:55:45 AM »Week 283 to be exact. Then again in 430ish. I understand if the script can't be set up that way. Wish it could.
Posted by: Corey
« on: July 29, 2018, 07:38:19 PM »Some important characters are not treated as "deaD" if thewwy are that plot-relevant later, basically like when you have perma-death on in Fire-Emblem and plot-relevant charatcers don't "die" so they can continue on with the story. We can't cut off the entire fifth era because Pellaeon happens to die earlier in another place, nor the second one if Thrawn dies under the EotH. There's no way to make that kind of branching either make sense or function. Pellaeon isn't an era two hero though anyways, so I'm not sure how you'd have gotten him killed as the Empire in era 2.
Posted by: Decepticon141
« on: July 29, 2018, 07:42:58 AM »Small but significant bug. Sanrafsix Starting defense spot is wrong. No commander would start their defense ships from that asteroid pocket. (This was in the 138 planet GC)
Also is is possible to address Gilad Pellaeon dying in Era 2 then coming back in the later Era? Personally he is my top 3 least favorite Imperials all time. Strange when after I "accidentally" hypered him in too close to a massive rebel fleet in week 80. Just to have him take over my Imperial Remnant in Era 5.
Also is is possible to address Gilad Pellaeon dying in Era 2 then coming back in the later Era? Personally he is my top 3 least favorite Imperials all time. Strange when after I "accidentally" hypered him in too close to a massive rebel fleet in week 80. Just to have him take over my Imperial Remnant in Era 5.