Posted by: Meyer
« on: October 31, 2007, 11:01:29 AM »yeah. even more than they had towards Thrawn.
Posted by: Slornie
« on: October 31, 2007, 08:00:06 AM »But they still held great respect and loyalty to Vader.
Posted by: Meyer
« on: October 31, 2007, 01:41:06 AM »no. she was the heir of Darth Vader yes. but Vader gave the noghri to Thrawn years before so she is only the daughter of their "savior".
Posted by: Scarecrow63
« on: October 30, 2007, 03:43:20 PM »Because technically she was his lord
Posted by: Meyer
« on: October 30, 2007, 01:19:55 AM »possible but you have to remember that Khabarakh had doubts about taking Leia to Honoghr. So why would he immediatly tell the name of their lord?
Posted by: Scarecrow63
« on: October 29, 2007, 05:06:36 PM »Im sure Thrawn came up, I mean he was the one that ordered him to kidnap leia
Posted by: Meyer
« on: October 29, 2007, 01:24:54 AM »maybe. but in the book it is mentioned that Leia didn't leran much from Khabarkh.
Posted by: GrndAdmrlPellaeon
« on: October 28, 2007, 11:55:45 AM »Ya, I believe he told her.
Posted by: Scarecrow63
« on: October 28, 2007, 11:34:41 AM »Maybe he told her
Posted by: Meyer
« on: October 28, 2007, 02:19:08 AM »when she was going to Honoghr with Khabarkh.
Posted by: sarcronis
« on: October 28, 2007, 12:53:27 AM »What part of dark force rising did she know it?
Posted by: Scarecrow63
« on: October 27, 2007, 05:01:30 PM »Yeah, i just checked, he doesnt say anything about Thrawn
Posted by: Meyer
« on: October 27, 2007, 04:54:54 PM »at least in the finnish edition of DFR, Ferrier doesn't mention Thrawn.
Posted by: Scarecrow63
« on: October 27, 2007, 04:50:29 PM »that was before the Coral Vanda trip, and i think he did say it, when he was telling them about the guy who was buying up ships like crazy
Posted by: Meyer
« on: October 27, 2007, 04:48:21 PM »Did they? I'm not sure. but I think it's possible.