Those working on this mod do so in their own free time and for no pay.
Show your support for them by enabling ads on this site!

Post reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 100 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:
Verification:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What is the name of the planet we live on? Type it backwards then add a 5.:
Who is taking revenge? (lowercase):

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: Meyer
« on: October 25, 2007, 09:40:41 AM »

I said almost. If you want everybody to love and like someone you have to wait a long time. of course there is always some who say that he is bad and bla bla bla. And many people were happy about Kristallnacht. And it was because of usa, gb and france that Hitler got to power so blame yourself. you could say gb almost brought it's own destruction. And FYI, Hitler wasn't the started of genocide. It was Himmler who organized and was in charge of it. And why didn't nobody say anything about that Kristallnacht when it happened? every other country accepted it.
Posted by: vadereclipse
« on: October 25, 2007, 07:51:06 AM »

hmm...
hitler-fascist xenophobic genocide starter-BAD
mussolini-pretty much the same and corupt-BAD
Mugabe-corrupt-BAD
as for the ancient ones, they are not really verypossible these days to be loved
and hitler was loved by everyone before 1939? you need to study nazi germany
november 8, 1937-kristallnacht(night of the broken glass) assisted by the people of germany, riots took place and hundreds of jews were murdered, synagogues were burnt down, and businesses were ransacked
i can safely say not all germans loved hitler before 1939.
Posted by: Meyer
« on: October 25, 2007, 01:18:51 AM »

yep. because every country is already united. at least the succesful ones. and there are many good dictators. ever heard of Augustus or Caesar? And Hitler was loved by almost everyone before september 1st 1939. And the term dictator itself is good.
Posted by: vadereclipse
« on: October 24, 2007, 04:54:17 PM »

well said scarecrow
and meyer, the onkly good dictator (from a to his people view, not in reasons of hum,anity adnd characteristics) was genghis Khan, who was known to be a rapist and has a gene pool of over 10 million poeople
but he brought together all the tribes of mongolia
needless to say, that cant happn in modern times.
Posted by: Scarecrow63
« on: October 24, 2007, 03:47:45 PM »

Democracy is a good system, we all just have the wrong people leading it
Posted by: Kratas
« on: October 24, 2007, 01:43:03 PM »

i agree nothing ever gets done apart from more and more roadworks
Posted by: Meyer
« on: October 24, 2007, 01:31:50 PM »

I'm not, yet. but if one man or woman decides everything it means that something will be done. now there are, in Finland for example, 200 MPs who just debate and don't get anything done. because only thing they agree is that they should get a raise. And of course that one leader can have and should have assistants. but the ultimate decision would be his/hers.
Posted by: Kratas
« on: October 24, 2007, 11:37:27 AM »

listening to you anyone would think you were a dictator
Posted by: Meyer
« on: October 24, 2007, 11:02:59 AM »

who says that dictatorship leads corrupiton and war? It only happens when dictators are fools. A good leader can be dictator without corruption, war and massmurders.
Posted by: Kratas
« on: October 24, 2007, 07:31:33 AM »

it also leads to war
Posted by: vadereclipse
« on: October 23, 2007, 02:07:04 PM »

dictatorship is pointless
people's interests arent accounted for
and it always leads to corruption
mugabe, etc
all corrupt
Posted by: Meyer
« on: October 23, 2007, 02:01:51 PM »

because of those outrageous salaries and the fact that MPs don't get anything done, I prefer dictatorship.
Posted by: vadereclipse
« on: October 23, 2007, 12:41:22 PM »

i dont have a problem with m=paying MPs taxes (i dont yet im 16)
they do something
the royal family do one think

make scandals
Posted by: s-t-n
« on: October 23, 2007, 12:38:57 PM »

i know....and (most) of the time, they dont do anything...but its because it is REALLY difficult when you are doing something...reading thousands of pages of a new law to make sure oyu have no objections
Posted by: Meyer
« on: October 23, 2007, 12:36:51 PM »

that's a lot of money that is used to pay them
Those working on this mod do so in their own free time and for no pay.
Show your support for them by enabling ads on this site!