Posted by: vadereclipse
« on: October 18, 2007, 03:23:16 PM »exactly
except technically revolution was october 1917
except technically revolution was october 1917
Posted by: Meyer
« on: October 18, 2007, 03:22:13 PM »from revolution to the death of Stalin?
my mistake ment civil war.
my mistake ment civil war.
Posted by: vadereclipse
« on: October 18, 2007, 03:21:03 PM »ill lay off you
i post too much on eeaw
i am studying the soviet union 1918-1953 now
i post too much on eeaw
i am studying the soviet union 1918-1953 now
Posted by: Meyer
« on: October 18, 2007, 03:13:34 PM »propably nobody except few historians. but studying history of a country helps you to understand it better in my mind. And I personally love history of all kind, especially WWII and ancient Rome. but back to topic before vadereclipse comes and says that all I do is spam.
Posted by: Scarecrow63
« on: October 18, 2007, 11:12:30 AM »Yeah but, no offense, who really cares much about Finland history?
Posted by: Meyer
« on: October 18, 2007, 02:33:11 AM »that's something I have always wondered. everyone knows german, russian and allied commanders but none knows the leader of finnish armed forces that stopped the red bear invasion. and he was our president even. and voted to be the greatest finn of all time.
Posted by: Scarecrow63
« on: October 17, 2007, 06:18:56 PM »Not many people besides Finns would know about him i doubt
Posted by: Meyer
« on: October 17, 2007, 12:30:36 AM »Mannerheim stopped the red invasion.
Posted by: GrndAdmrlPellaeon
« on: October 16, 2007, 09:46:18 PM »You, of all people M-t-I. I guess you finally decided to take your medication.
Posted by: Scarecrow63
« on: October 16, 2007, 08:13:24 PM »He did do good work in the Husky operation
Posted by: Mandalore-the-Inquizitor
« on: October 16, 2007, 07:38:38 PM »i say patton do to his work in africa and operation husky
Posted by: Meyer
« on: October 16, 2007, 09:36:05 AM »he didn't command the surface fleet, Raeder did. 1943 Hitler fired Raeder and nominated D
Posted by: Slornie
« on: October 16, 2007, 09:25:17 AM »Meh, his submarine force was primarily aimed at the Merchant Navy rather than the Royal Navy.. Although i do admit that he came close to closing the supply lanes. I was under the impression, however, that his surface fleet was far less successful..
Posted by: Meyer
« on: October 16, 2007, 09:15:20 AM »well he nearly defeated Royal Navy.
Posted by: Slornie
« on: October 16, 2007, 09:13:30 AM »Heh, i see you found and withdrew the claim, so fair enough.
I dont really know, each having faced different circumstances, its hard to evaluate.. But in the end i voted for D
I dont really know, each having faced different circumstances, its hard to evaluate.. But in the end i voted for D