Posted by: Meyer
« on: August 22, 2007, 09:42:24 AM »well let's also hope they can make it less expenssive.
Posted by: Scarecrow63
« on: August 22, 2007, 12:39:22 AM »Unfortuneately its on the expensive side and most countries wont be able to afford it
Posted by: Meyer
« on: August 22, 2007, 12:37:02 AM »yes. but when they do get it work... all is well.
Posted by: Scarecrow63
« on: August 22, 2007, 12:35:53 AM »I think fusion is practically foolproof, the only problem is getting it to work
Posted by: Meyer
« on: August 22, 2007, 12:35:16 AM »yes. bring in the fusion.
Posted by: sarcronis
« on: August 22, 2007, 12:35:01 AM »Unless it goes wrong and kills everyone, but that is unlikely.
Posted by: Scarecrow63
« on: August 22, 2007, 12:34:18 AM »And fusion we will be next, even better
Posted by: sarcronis
« on: August 22, 2007, 12:33:37 AM »Nuclear power is the most economical, efficient process we have available now.
Posted by: Meyer
« on: August 22, 2007, 12:32:20 AM »exactly. I trust nuclear power. I don't care what some hippies say.
Posted by: Scarecrow63
« on: August 22, 2007, 12:31:02 AM »And they didnt turn out so bad as to not warrant their use
Posted by: Meyer
« on: August 22, 2007, 12:29:43 AM »Two ofthe mostsevere nuclearthathave happened happened in USA and russia. chernobyl and three mile island things.
Posted by: sarcronis
« on: August 21, 2007, 02:39:25 PM »I live 50 miles from one and it doesn't scare anyone I know.
Posted by: Scarecrow63
« on: August 21, 2007, 02:38:26 PM »Compared to the amount of power plants out there? I used to live 5 miles from a nuclear power plant, i was fine with it
Posted by: sarcronis
« on: August 21, 2007, 02:37:23 PM »2 maybe 3. not that many.
Posted by: Scarecrow63
« on: August 21, 2007, 02:30:22 PM »Im saying all of them