Those working on this mod do so in their own free time and for no pay.
Show your support for them by enabling ads on this site!

Author Topic: The strategic plans and tactics of the Big Three Deep Core Warlords.  (Read 12830 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

December 19, 2014, 12:52:50 AMReply #20

Offline Lord Xizer

  • Tester
  • Grand Moff
  • *
  • Posts: 3,222
  • Approval: +134/-14
  • Nothing shall withstand my ambition.
    • View Profile
Re: The strategic plans and tactics of the Big Three Deep Core Warlords.
« Reply #20 on: December 19, 2014, 12:52:50 AM »
Excellent!

But actually, while playing a bit of Galactic Conquest again i realised i have an approach somewhat between Harrsk and Delvardus.
I build massive fleets of Victory II Stardestroyer, and Escortcarriers

I think you mean a combination of Delvardus and Teradoc
"I do not intend to be the Emperor's servant forever..."-High Inquisitor Jerec

"The New Order has never fallen. Only the Emperor."-Grand Moff Ardus Kaine

December 19, 2014, 04:42:18 AMReply #21

Offline Guderian

  • Rear Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 149
  • Approval: +7/-1
    • View Profile
Re: The strategic plans and tactics of the Big Three Deep Core Warlords.
« Reply #21 on: December 19, 2014, 04:42:18 AM »
I think you mean a combination of Delvardus and Teradoc
I wasnt sure about that myself.
Victories do classify as Battleships so thats more Harrsk
the great numbers are more from Teradoc true, but i build bigger ship
(and with massive fleets in this case its about 5-10 victories at a borderplanet)
so i went with Harrsk.
Damn you, now im confused ^^

December 19, 2014, 09:42:42 AMReply #22

Offline tlmiller

  • Tester
  • Moff
  • *
  • Posts: 2,363
  • Approval: +56/-9
  • Don't turn around you moron, ATTACK!!!!!
    • View Profile
Re: The strategic plans and tactics of the Big Three Deep Core Warlords.
« Reply #22 on: December 19, 2014, 09:42:42 AM »
I wasnt sure about that myself.
Victories do classify as Battleships so thats more Harrsk
the great numbers are more from Teradoc true, but i build bigger ship
(and with massive fleets in this case its about 5-10 victories at a borderplanet)
so i went with Harrsk.
Damn you, now im confused ^^

Terradoc relied on Victories as the mainstay of his fleet.

Harsk relied on more "traditional" imperial ships, ISD's and the like.
People should not be afraid of their government...governments should be afraid of their people.

December 19, 2014, 12:14:12 PMReply #23

Offline Lord Xizer

  • Tester
  • Grand Moff
  • *
  • Posts: 3,222
  • Approval: +134/-14
  • Nothing shall withstand my ambition.
    • View Profile
Re: The strategic plans and tactics of the Big Three Deep Core Warlords.
« Reply #23 on: December 19, 2014, 12:14:12 PM »
I wasnt sure about that myself.
Victories do classify as Battleships so thats more Harrsk
the great numbers are more from Teradoc true, but i build bigger ship
(and with massive fleets in this case its about 5-10 victories at a borderplanet)
so i went with Harrsk.
Damn you, now im confused ^^

Yeah the mainstay of Harrsk's fleets were ISDs Tectors and the like. Teradoc was the one mass spamming VSDs
"I do not intend to be the Emperor's servant forever..."-High Inquisitor Jerec

"The New Order has never fallen. Only the Emperor."-Grand Moff Ardus Kaine

December 19, 2014, 04:27:10 PMReply #24

Offline Guderian

  • Rear Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 149
  • Approval: +7/-1
    • View Profile
Re: The strategic plans and tactics of the Big Three Deep Core Warlords.
« Reply #24 on: December 19, 2014, 04:27:10 PM »
Okay thanks for clearing that up.
I seriously need to read some EU books ^^

December 19, 2014, 08:46:09 PMReply #25

Offline CaptainPogo

  • Brevet Admiral
  • ****
  • Posts: 87
  • Approval: +3/-0
  • Won't be running into traps today!
    • View Profile
Re: The strategic plans and tactics of the Big Three Deep Core Warlords.
« Reply #25 on: December 19, 2014, 08:46:09 PM »
I do say Harrsk gets some points for trying to be more of the traditional fleet while keeping a balance but at the same time, it makes me feel that this really is a weakness that will blow in his face given time.

His fleet is sorta becomes a jack of all trades deal, with a good number of ships but having decent firepower to make it a fight when he has to. While this works very well with the Rebellion...I can't say the same for the New Republic. The NR as time goes by has proven to grow past their old weakness of fleets composed of either old formidable war machines or ships quickly converted for war and are quickly making progress on making actual war machines that can more or less keep up with ISDs.

Overtime, I think Harrsk will find himself outgunned/outnumbered eventually.


December 20, 2014, 12:08:52 AMReply #26

Offline tlmiller

  • Tester
  • Moff
  • *
  • Posts: 2,363
  • Approval: +56/-9
  • Don't turn around you moron, ATTACK!!!!!
    • View Profile
Re: The strategic plans and tactics of the Big Three Deep Core Warlords.
« Reply #26 on: December 20, 2014, 12:08:52 AM »
I do say Harrsk gets some points for trying to be more of the traditional fleet while keeping a balance but at the same time, it makes me feel that this really is a weakness that will blow in his face given time.

His fleet is sorta becomes a jack of all trades deal, with a good number of ships but having decent firepower to make it a fight when he has to. While this works very well with the Rebellion...I can't say the same for the New Republic. The NR as time goes by has proven to grow past their old weakness of fleets composed of either old formidable war machines or ships quickly converted for war and are quickly making progress on making actual war machines that can more or less keep up with ISDs.

Overtime, I think Harrsk will find himself outgunned/outnumbered eventually.

By the time of the new class standardization, the MC90 will probably equal to slightly defeat an ISD-I, while a Nebula SD will, without difficulty, defeat an ISD-I.
People should not be afraid of their government...governments should be afraid of their people.

December 20, 2014, 12:48:45 AMReply #27

Offline Pali

  • Tester
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 790
  • Approval: +39/-2
    • View Profile
Re: The strategic plans and tactics of the Big Three Deep Core Warlords.
« Reply #27 on: December 20, 2014, 12:48:45 AM »
By the time of the new class standardization, the MC90 will probably equal to slightly defeat an ISD-I, while a Nebula SD will, without difficulty, defeat an ISD-I.

I'd expect the Tector would probably pull even with the Nebula, maybe be a bit more powerful even, except the Nebula's fighters vs the no-hangar Tector would wreck it.

December 20, 2014, 10:07:58 AMReply #28

Offline Lord Xizer

  • Tester
  • Grand Moff
  • *
  • Posts: 3,222
  • Approval: +134/-14
  • Nothing shall withstand my ambition.
    • View Profile
Re: The strategic plans and tactics of the Big Three Deep Core Warlords.
« Reply #28 on: December 20, 2014, 10:07:58 AM »
I'd expect the Tector would probably pull even with the Nebula, maybe be a bit more powerful even, except the Nebula's fighters vs the no-hangar Tector would wreck it.

Yes plus we do know Harrsk had the Dominion and Megador but they were unmanned in Deep Space Nine(Harrsk's shipyard) my guess is he planned to disassemble these two vessels and build a lot more ISDs with their resources(Similar to what the NR said they would do with Lusankya)
"I do not intend to be the Emperor's servant forever..."-High Inquisitor Jerec

"The New Order has never fallen. Only the Emperor."-Grand Moff Ardus Kaine

March 12, 2017, 10:00:22 PMReply #29

Offline DarthRevansRevenge

  • Admiral
  • *******
  • Posts: 765
  • Approval: +14/-3
  • Your empire is doomed. Revan has returned
    • View Profile
yes, i'm resurecting this, but i would also go Delvardus route. or maybe somewhere in between Delvardus and Harrsk....
do you know what really makes me mad? that the NR didn't make as many different SSDs as the empire. they would have won much faster had they done so. it's just not fair. but, if their were more NR SSDs, they would be absolute SUPER-CARRIERS.

but, i'm a member of the PA at heart, and my wish here is to join the ranks of grand admirals... sorry, the elite imperial alignment

March 13, 2017, 10:49:38 AMReply #30

Offline Lord Xizer

  • Tester
  • Grand Moff
  • *
  • Posts: 3,222
  • Approval: +134/-14
  • Nothing shall withstand my ambition.
    • View Profile
I see
"I do not intend to be the Emperor's servant forever..."-High Inquisitor Jerec

"The New Order has never fallen. Only the Emperor."-Grand Moff Ardus Kaine

March 13, 2017, 10:51:58 AMReply #31

Offline Lord Xizer

  • Tester
  • Grand Moff
  • *
  • Posts: 3,222
  • Approval: +134/-14
  • Nothing shall withstand my ambition.
    • View Profile
yes, i'm resurecting this, but i would also go Delvardus route. or maybe somewhere in between Delvardus and Harrsk....

So ISDs, Battle cruisers and an all powerful SSD
"I do not intend to be the Emperor's servant forever..."-High Inquisitor Jerec

"The New Order has never fallen. Only the Emperor."-Grand Moff Ardus Kaine

March 13, 2017, 11:27:07 AMReply #32

Offline DarthRevansRevenge

  • Admiral
  • *******
  • Posts: 765
  • Approval: +14/-3
  • Your empire is doomed. Revan has returned
    • View Profile
absolutely. plus tie defenders, interceptors, and the 4 pod tie bombers
do you know what really makes me mad? that the NR didn't make as many different SSDs as the empire. they would have won much faster had they done so. it's just not fair. but, if their were more NR SSDs, they would be absolute SUPER-CARRIERS.

but, i'm a member of the PA at heart, and my wish here is to join the ranks of grand admirals... sorry, the elite imperial alignment

March 13, 2017, 03:32:37 PMReply #33

Offline Lord Xizer

  • Tester
  • Grand Moff
  • *
  • Posts: 3,222
  • Approval: +134/-14
  • Nothing shall withstand my ambition.
    • View Profile
absolutely. plus tie defenders, interceptors, and the 4 pod tie bombers

Night Hammer escorted by two Praetor II battlecruisers, two Immobilzor 418 Interdictor Cruisers and sixteen Victory II Class Star Destroyers with the fighter and bomber squadrons replaced by TIE Defenders. I would be without rival.
"I do not intend to be the Emperor's servant forever..."-High Inquisitor Jerec

"The New Order has never fallen. Only the Emperor."-Grand Moff Ardus Kaine

March 16, 2017, 03:02:27 PMReply #34

Offline DarthRevansRevenge

  • Admiral
  • *******
  • Posts: 765
  • Approval: +14/-3
  • Your empire is doomed. Revan has returned
    • View Profile
i would have a Night Hammer, 2 Praetor II, 1 Interdictor Star Destroyer, 2 Immobilizor cruisers, 5 ISD-II, 1 Tector, 2 Secutor, 3 torpedo spheres, 5 victory I, 5 Victory II, 4 Imperial II class carriers, and 20 Lancers. the fleet is fully stocked with TIE Defenders, and all ships have added anti-aircraft/point-defence lasers. i would be unstoppable!

now that i say that, i want to see that fleet
« Last Edit: March 16, 2017, 03:04:17 PM by DarthRevansRevenge »
do you know what really makes me mad? that the NR didn't make as many different SSDs as the empire. they would have won much faster had they done so. it's just not fair. but, if their were more NR SSDs, they would be absolute SUPER-CARRIERS.

but, i'm a member of the PA at heart, and my wish here is to join the ranks of grand admirals... sorry, the elite imperial alignment

 

Those working on this mod do so in their own free time and for no pay.
Show your support for them by enabling ads on this site!