Those working on this mod do so in their own free time and for no pay.
Show your support for them by enabling ads on this site!

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Lord Xizer

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 ... 149
41
Well there's a few issues here.
Hethrir did attempt to forge alliances with the Deep Core Warlords, not just Zero Command. By the time of Desann(who was working for Hethrir) launching his Empire Reborn offensive Harrsk was dead and Zero Command reunified into the Empire under Pellaeon.
Further The Disciples of Ragnos were formed after Hethrir and the Empire Reborn movement were destroyed, so the time lines don't add up.

42
Gorgeous

Thanks, good to see another fan of the Grand Admirals other than Thrawn. I presume Tigellinus is a personal favorite of yours?

43
Forum Games / Re: Last Person to Post Wins
« on: May 05, 2018, 12:47:12 PM »
The RvB series is actually painfully accurate on being in the military lol.
I can't drive a tank, I thought you could!
No I'm not armor certified I thought you were!
Oh my god who is running this army?!

44
Forum Games / Re: Last Person to Post Wins
« on: May 02, 2018, 03:34:23 PM »
This post...

45
News & Updates / Re: [ICW 2.2] Era Progression Overhaul
« on: May 01, 2018, 03:37:41 PM »
Because it was fun that if you wanted to keep Thrawn, you could keep thrawn.  Or as the NR, you could try to avoid Thrawn to avoid facing palpatine. Now that it forces you to progress, it just isn't any fun anymore IMO.
Isn't this the point of single era GCs? I actually feel like the new era progression is an improvement as it factors lore and story progression into things and if you don't like it you have tons of single era GCs to do what you previously stated.
Further all the main Imperial leaders(Pestage, Carvin, Isard, Thrawn,Palpatine, and Jax were all betrayed and killed by circumstances that would be outside normal game control and the last two-Daala and Pellaeon have fairly similar ships and units so it hardly seems problematic to have the event oriented progression as it is now.

46
Absolutely. As it should be.

The PA does work nicely as a carrier faction. Zsinj being the odd one out has made me think of all those empion mines, explosive asteroids and night cloaks. Maybe Zsinj could have some special abilities other factions don't have? *Looks at Mini modder Lord Xizer*
He will. We're working on night cloak ideas(in my sub mod) improved Raptor forces(including assault shuttles) Project Morrt(allowing following units with tracking)project Chubar(terrorist brain washing units that can move to any world and blow something up and his hidden support network(similar to smugglers in base game.

47
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: Ranking the Factions
« on: April 27, 2018, 12:54:46 PM »
You know the PA can recruit Jerecs SSD Vengeance(under cpt Sysco) from any major shipyards for 60k(42k if you have gregor) so they still have 2 SSDs

48
For my sub mod I plan to make the GM more focused on medium fast sips. More firepower and speed less armor and health.
EA will be heavy unit focus and long range-quality over quantity.
PA will be mainly carrier based
Zsinj will be subversion, commandos and quality elite raptor.
All SSDs getting duel heavy turbolasers(executor class) instead of single turn is.
Night Hammer is getting significant changes, much greater cost, build time and reduced speed but increased health, massively increased TIE fighter and bomber complement and some sensor detectability effects.
I'll be adding some Kazrak slavers for PA, Trandoshans for GM and a few other flavor elements.

49
Forum Games / Re: Last Person to Post Wins
« on: April 27, 2018, 12:38:38 PM »
It's not power I want. What I wanted to take back from the PATRIOTS were things like freedom, civil liberties and opportunity. Everything that's about to be erased by their digital censorship. ll I want Jack is to be remembered by other people, by history. Rather than an intron of history, I would be remembered as an EXON! But the PATRIOTS would deny us even that. I want my memory, my existence to remain! I will triumph over the PATRIOTS and liberate us all and we shall become the Sons of Liberty!

50
Forum Games / Re: Last Person to Post Wins
« on: April 22, 2018, 06:44:47 PM »
wow. nothing in 3 days? What happened here?

I've been rather busy with sub mod planning, testing and life.

51
What do you think about adding Ars Dangor, the imperial advisor, as an economic hero under Thrawn.

He'd make more sense in the Crimson Empire arc where he was part of the Imperial Ruling Council of Blood under Jax.

52
I was looking around for more information on the yevetha ( because I didn’t get to read the books on them) and I found this.

According to Ayddar, the order of battle for Black Sword includes forty-four capital ships which we have not seen nor heard of since the fall of the Emperor. None smaller than a Victory-class Star Destroyer. Three are Superclass vessels.

That’s a quote I found while looking for information on the black sword command; so I did a little more digging and it doesn’t say if they were destroyed or not.

so I was wondering how are you going to fit those other two in or even if you plan to at all.
Yes but this was Black Swords 'initial' order of battle. However due to reassignment and the post endor chaos most of Black Sword was sent elsewhere. Only nine ships were there at the time of the Yevethan revolt at N'zoth. A lot of the rest were lost in battles over that time period which accounts for the High Command thinking the entire group were lost.

53
Star Wars Discussion / Re: Opinion: Dark Empire is a little stupid
« on: April 03, 2018, 02:42:29 PM »
Crystal Star is 1/5 territory, Darksaber is more like 2/5 or 2.5/5 being generous. Its a bit silly but has some enjoyable moments and I enjoyed it circa 1996 probably because it was being compared to the Crystal Star And Corellia trilogy.


 How about I raise you a Planet of Twilight, The New Rebellion, and perhaps a Mandalorian Armor?
I'd put Darksaber at a solid 3 out of 5. Good and enjoyable but not on the X Wing series level. The X Wing series, Darth Bane trilogy, Thrawn trilogy are the 5 level. Shadows, bounty hunter wars and Force Heretic are 4 level.

I'll see your planet of twilight, new rebellion and mandalorian armor and raise you Crimson Empie I-III, Tales of the Bounty Hunters and Tag & Bink.

54
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: ICW Daily Screenshots Thread
« on: April 02, 2018, 09:10:33 PM »
The galaxy has changed...it's MINE for the taking!

55
Star Wars Discussion / Re: Opinion: Dark Empire is a little stupid
« on: April 02, 2018, 11:33:20 AM »
I have Darksaber available in HC, bought back in 95 or 96 IIRC. I liked it at the time (I was 16 or 17) tried rereading it and yeah it is kind of erm crap now.
NJO around 19 books of which maybe 5 were any good (the early/1st 3+ Aaron Alston?).

 I think the only legends stuff I liked after the 90's were maybe the legacy books (looked good by comparison to NJO), the legacy comic series and some of the RPG material for Star Wars Saga Edition.

 Main plotline anyway I liked the 1st Darth bane book and some of the Zahn books.

I don't think Darksaber falls into the 'crap' category- that is reserved for. Crystal Star, The Corellian trilogy and Children of the Jedi. It has memorable moments, is pivotal to various characters development and does a good job of showing viewpoints on the stories players.
It does suffer from plot bunny syndrome, lack of investment in the callista subplot and some cheesiness.

As to the NJO though, they were vastly superior in terms of character development, stakes, scale and writing. The Enemy Lines, Star by Star, the Force Heretic and the last prophecy were all incredible writing. Legacy was too much an unneeded rehash of CW and reboot feels

56
Star Wars Discussion / Re: Opinion: Dark Empire is a little stupid
« on: April 02, 2018, 04:57:45 AM »
+1 I learned about it indirectly back in the day via the Jedi Academy trilogy (Clone Emperor huh?).

 It started a tendency of can you top this carried on in the JA, Darksaber, Vong Invasion and even the new movies.

Darksaber and the Yuuzhan Vong War are actually some of my favorites-though I admit both have flaws- they are light years above Dark Empire in terms of quality,story and impact.

57
Depends on how you're defining Right there.  Stannis was next in line after Robert, true, but Robert was a usurper who seized the Iron Throne from the Targaryen line that created it in the first place - prior to Aegon's conquest there was no single ruler of Westeros, simply seven independent kingdoms.

Personally, I think Stannis would've been a terrible king.  Not because he was a bad person or incompetent, but because he was terrible with people - a king needs to maintain the loyalty of the lords and play them against each other, and Stannis never showed a talent for playing politics of that nature.  He's respected, but neither loved nor feared, and come winter his inability to inspire or motivate the lords would've torn the kingdoms apart as they tried to survive the onslaught.

Of course, Dany's not all that great a queen either, nor Jon Snow a great king - but these two are younger and more malleable, more willing to acknowledge and learn from their mistakes, so the potential to grow into the roles is there.  Stannis was too old and too stubborn to change his ways.

Simple, the Targaryan dynasty was created by Right of Conques. When Aegon conquered Westeros it established that as a Right recognized by the kingdoms. When Robert Baratheon killed Prince Rhaegar(effectively defeating the Targaryan dynasty at the Battle of the Trident and ensuring the collapse of the Mad King) and then took the Iron Throne the Targaryan dynasty was replaced by Right of Conquest with the Baratheon Dynasty-again widely accepted and then proven by the kingdoms as the new legitimate dynasty. Since Robert had no trueborn heirs the Throne by right of both birth, blood and succession passes by law to Stannis since the Baratheon Dynasty was not overthrown by conquest and the lannister bastards rule with Baratheon last names because it is still the acknowledged dynasty.

Stannis would I think be a good king-though an unpopular one- his reforms are based off merit earned, he would scour the court clean and appoint men of talent instead of sycophants. It is precisely this reason the schemes like Baelish and varys oppose him because he is not corruptible or acceptable to bribery and flattery. He's probably the best military commander in Westeros on land or sea and is just. He inspires no love but fierce loyalty in those who follow him, "the lords might have their doubts but the common man believed in their King-he was Robert's brother, victor of the famous battle off fair isle.-ADoD
Stannis would not be popular with the Lords but with support from the Iron Bank, a proven mind for both governing and warfare none would be able to mount effective challenge to his position were he to sit the Throne.

Finally your claim Stannis is too old to change is not based on what we've seen. He has the kingdom's longevity in mind sees the need to bend when it's called for and showed great versitility and the ability to adapt from the time Davos returned after Blackwater to his present time in the North-listening to Jon, distancing himself from the red woman, winning the northern clans and the iron bank.

58
I honestly wish Ezra and Thrawn show up and kill them all.
You can have a pilot played by Kit Harington says "True Empire is back bitches" before killing off maybe Rose and Finn.
Poe can live and maybe you can have Kylo take all his troops and moved to six small planets.
done.

We have quite enough poorly written segways due to plot with no thought or reason behind them already. Don't need more

59
While i do agree Stannis is the mannis and should have been king (he probably get shit done) i still like Dany.
And while Dany is very pretty i like more because we see her go from this weak little girl to this ruthless and fiery Targaryen with a little mercy in her heart. Whether or not she is qualified is another story.(though judging by how she ruled marreen, she be feared by the commenors, but attract plenty of suitors)

Rey on the other hand is shown to have not gone through a living hell. All she lived on was a hot planet where she worked for food. Unlike Dany she wasn't beaten, raped, almost murder, and betrayed by some of her closest allies.

I agree on this point. Dany has had actual character building and is shown to be flawed yet improving. She did have to work to get where she is and we get to SEE that development, further she has had lots of help and tutoring by experienced people around her, men and women. Rey by contrast starts at max level, has no flaws to overcome and is just better at everything than everyone else. The rest of the cast might as well not even be there. She's better with the Force than Luke-in spite of never being trained, she flies better and can fix the Falcon faster than Han and Chewie-by herself-she is more of a rallying point than Leia, she saves herself when captured, she constantly humiliates her supposed rival on the dark side and saves his life in spite of having roughly 10 hours training in the Force(which was really just Luke showing her one thing to convince her to NOT train) she can speak wookie, swim, fly and use the advanced techniques of the Force with zero reason or explanation as to WHY she can just DO all these things and have no weaknesses. She never pays for her decisions at all, unlike Dany, so there is zero investment in her 'character' Rey can't fall or fuck up, so there's never a time I feel she's in any actual danger or learning something. There is no PROGRESSION. What is her motivation for fighting the First Order? What is her investment in Kylo Ren-a guy she has spent less than a day around-and in that time period he killed her father figure and murdered billions, then just kind of asks her to join him. There's no investment, no development and no growth.  It's actually very sad that they had a chance to bring all the OT guys together for some scenes of interaction but didn't, they wanted them back in but didn't want them to be who they were because plot required it, not because it made sense to the character progression. These flaws will only become MORE apparent with time, the spectacle will fade, the special effects will age and the hype will die down-when that happens what are we left with? The characters and story, both of which in the new franchise are contradictory and under developed.

(and while I don't think Stannis will ever actually sit the Throne-that's not how his character arc is set up to play out in the books-he is certainly the best for the job as well as also being the Rightful King by all the laws of Gods and Men in Westeros)

60
Hey Lay off Daenerys. They aren't really comparable because Daenerys goes through hell and back. Also i say more people like Jon Snow because he is what people should be. People mostly like Daenerys because she is hot, ruthless, and powerful,

Stand down Dragon, That throne belongs to Stannis. A just and qualified King. It is also his by Right.
I also didn't lay into Dany, I was drawing a parallel between people liking someone solely based on looks and general is instead of qualification.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 ... 149
Those working on this mod do so in their own free time and for no pay.
Show your support for them by enabling ads on this site!