Those working on this mod do so in their own free time and for no pay.
Show your support for them by enabling ads on this site!

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - tlmiller

Pages: 1 ... 94 95 96 97 [98] 99 100 101 102 103
1941
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: Suggestions for 2.1
« on: August 22, 2012, 10:12:55 PM »
Oh, cool.  AT-TE is my favorite ground forces there are.  Nowhere near as capable as the AT-AT in the games that have them, but so much cooler looking.

1942
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: Suggestions for 2.1
« on: August 22, 2012, 09:32:22 PM »
The Recusant falls under the same category as the other non-IGC CIS units, and the problems with the DSD are more logistical than anything. As far as the AT-TE, I wouldn't be opposed to having it replace the AT-AT for them after era 2 or something.

Although if you do that, they really should get the AT-AT in era 1 (currently in patch5, it's only era2+).

1943
Forum Games / Re: What are you listening to right now?
« on: August 22, 2012, 09:24:19 PM »
Rush - The Analog Kid.

1944
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: Suggestions for 2.1
« on: August 21, 2012, 05:40:43 PM »
It can easily hold it's own against 3 ISD-II's or MC80b's from what I've found in my testing.  AI doesn't build enough MC90's for me to have tested that.

1945
News & Updates / Re: Imperial Civil War 2.0 Manual [Download]
« on: August 19, 2012, 10:21:39 PM »
And as soon as I post, it becomes a normal link.

1946
News & Updates / Re: Imperial Civil War 2.0 Manual [Download]
« on: August 19, 2012, 10:20:42 PM »
The ModDB one isn't a link anymore.

I point this out because Scribd requires you to sign up.

1947
News & Updates / Re: Imperial Civil War 2.0 Manual [Download]
« on: August 19, 2012, 10:18:18 PM »
Quote from: Gamefront
The file you are looking for seems to be unavailable at the moment. Please come back later.

1948
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: Suggestions for 2.1
« on: August 19, 2012, 06:43:07 PM »
Well, since we're not doing two seperate Palpatine cycles we just went with the one that came first to cover the whole era. After all, the Eclipse II only became the flagship after the first Eclipse was destroyed so making the Eclipse II be the one represented alone would seem kind of like jumping the gun, and doing both in sequence would be kind of overkill.

And also asking too much of the evil New Republic to be able to defeat two of the eclipses.

1949
I'll abandon some, and I do have a tendency to sell a lot of units (corvettes, units that tend to act as nothing more than cannon fodder like Dreadnaughts, etc), but I try to keep my initial "core" planets.  The only thing I wish was changed with it is that the PA won't be able to be used for it.  Which is too bad.  I might still try it as the EOTH or IR though.

1950
Ascendancy Discussion / Re: Ascendancy? :o
« on: August 17, 2012, 07:34:06 PM »
Depending on how the mod looks when it's released, I might pick up the game.  Doesn't look in the least bit interesting to play (for me) as it is, but with the mod, I imagine I'd enjoy it.

1951
Star Wars Discussion / Re: The Star Wars That I Used to Know
« on: August 17, 2012, 02:09:11 PM »
:D

1952
Star Wars Discussion / Re: MC80 Liberty Type Vs Imperator mk I
« on: August 16, 2012, 02:13:08 PM »
What's the basis for this?  As i recall, the ISD-II was known as "174,000 design flaws waiting to be exploited". Presumably the ISD-I was just as riddled with faults and design flaws which would naturally have an impact on reliability and repair times! :P

Yes, but they were all the same.  Each MC80 was different from every other MC80, so there was no "oh, go to here and fix this", that if you've repaired one you can repair any.  You had to learn each ship anew.

1953
Star Wars Discussion / Re: MC80 Liberty Type Vs Imperator mk I
« on: August 16, 2012, 12:55:32 AM »
En-masse, I'd take the MC80 for exactly the reason woodie pointed out.  You can pull them back to let the shields recharge even if they've been completely drained.

However, I think the ISD is better looking, and 1 on 1, I'll take it every time.

1954
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: Vicount v.s. Sovereign
« on: August 15, 2012, 09:30:22 AM »
My garrison then for Kuat is the same on the Golans and the Hypervelocity.  But then I have 1 Sovereign, 1 Executor, 2 Praetor II's, and 4 ISD II's

1955
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: Vicount v.s. Sovereign
« on: August 14, 2012, 11:40:19 PM »
And 1 above Kuat...after all, you don't want to lose KDY...

1956
Also many of the maps that have been redone have more areas that aren't accessible to mechs.

1957
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: Vicount v.s. Sovereign
« on: August 14, 2012, 07:40:37 PM »
Extremely.  You can count how far your hair grows while moving any fleet that has a Sovereign in it the things are so bloody slow (and yes, I realize this is canon).

1958
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: Suggestions for 2.1
« on: August 14, 2012, 07:38:54 PM »
Yes, that made me happy.  I had argued for the Enforcer months before 2.0 started beta-ing.

1959
My problem with the Rebellion/NR is from the movies.  You had Luke "I am such a bad actor I have trouble portraying that I'm wearing clothes because of my stupidity" Skywalker as the hero of the Rebellion.  If that's the hero's, I'm rooting for the Empire!!

1960
News & Updates / Re: 2.0 Preview: The Katana Fleet
« on: August 14, 2012, 04:51:24 PM »
That's, basically, just basically awesome.  :D

Pages: 1 ... 94 95 96 97 [98] 99 100 101 102 103
Those working on this mod do so in their own free time and for no pay.
Show your support for them by enabling ads on this site!