21
Star Wars Discussion / Re: Unknown Imperial Ship Identity? Background, SW Battlefront 2 SP Story Trailer.
« on: October 01, 2017, 09:18:06 AM »
yup. that's her raider. no doubt about it.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
22
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: Planet-Specific Shipyards
« on: September 28, 2017, 02:36:51 PM »
you really obsessed with this? play the NJO Compilation mod when it comes out. should satisfy all you mega-massive numbers of ships needs
23
Imperial Civil War Community Mods / Re: Infinities/expansion submod for 2.2
« on: September 24, 2017, 09:25:22 PM »
thank you. have to say, i've made no progress. also, when i do make it, it will be an add-on for Lord Xizer&Co's submod
25
Star Wars Discussion / Re: Procurator-class Star Battlecruiser
« on: September 16, 2017, 09:48:59 PM »
While maybe ugly, people have said the NR stuff is ugly. Everyone has their own tastes. While not the best, it is interesting. Also, for the sake of diversity, it is a good pick for another unique battle cruiser,.
26
Star Wars Discussion / Re: Procurator-class Star Battlecruiser
« on: September 14, 2017, 09:28:17 PM »
actually like the look. good to see he is sticking with the Bulky designs(see assertor)
i got to say, for the 200 years prior thing, looks like the empire recycled the design for the ship. would LOVE to see this in TR for a 4th battlecruiser for the empire and for some Imperial warlords variaty even more. No corey, not pressuring you yet, but if this could show up in ICW 2.3, FOTR 0.6, or ASC 1.2 that would be awesome. also, on the republic note, we have a heavy ship for the Republic fleets now guys
i got to say, for the 200 years prior thing, looks like the empire recycled the design for the ship. would LOVE to see this in TR for a 4th battlecruiser for the empire and for some Imperial warlords variaty even more. No corey, not pressuring you yet, but if this could show up in ICW 2.3, FOTR 0.6, or ASC 1.2 that would be awesome. also, on the republic note, we have a heavy ship for the Republic fleets now guys
27
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: Your Best/Most Memorable Battles
« on: September 14, 2017, 08:01:03 PM »
lol. same as in regular
28
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: Unit suggestions [Split from Tester Signup]
« on: September 13, 2017, 11:26:05 AM »Unit suggestions, you say? Do you poor people understand the gravity of your query..? Well... If you're sure you want me to...
SNIP
No rebuttals? I guess I'll press on
SNIP
this is a lot of Balance things you have. but a suggestion for you. if these don't get implemented, which some of them might, haven't gone through everything of yours, you should try releasing a balance submod for 2.2. it's perfectly allowed, and it helps people bring more variety in balance to the table. I'll consider these for our submod though
29
Imperial Civil War Community Mods / Re: Submod announcement: GCW in TR
« on: September 12, 2017, 09:38:05 AM »
i wonder if Petroglyph will patch the game again too fix that problem... that would be nice
30
News & Updates / Re: Leading to Release, Official EaW Patch & Era 4 Breakdown
« on: September 12, 2017, 09:35:51 AM »
so, Black fleet, Orinda, Caamas, and the final imperial push are all in Era 5?
31
Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback / Re: Imperial Mutiny Event (Split from ICW Daily Screenshots Thread)
« on: September 07, 2017, 04:12:03 PM »
i love how the 1 post i had in the 12 post discussion about this was what was inlcuded for the topic. Thanks corey
32
Star Wars Discussion / Re: Disney Star Wars cannon? Or EU (Legends)
« on: September 06, 2017, 10:22:36 AM »
even looking at the Movie, it is a Large ship, but not a %#$@ing Battlecruiser, as the first Mon Cal Battlecruiser ship was the Mediator. even if i wasn't going for the 1445 meters limit i saw in the book, or the 1300 meters length on Wookieepdia(i looked again after i posted previously) i would only scale it up to 1800-1900 meters. Large? yes. Super Capital sized? NO
33
Star Wars Discussion / Re: Disney Star Wars cannon? Or EU (Legends)
« on: September 05, 2017, 05:30:05 PM »
Nope. While disputed, a cross-sections book for movies 1-6 put Home One's length at 1445 meters, with 36 Turbolasers, 36 ion Cannons, 10 fighter squadrons, and mon cal tech. The Liberty is 1200 meters, and we all know the ISD's length. So, sorry, but Petroglyph got it wrong
34
Star Wars Discussion / Re: Disney Star Wars cannon? Or EU (Legends)
« on: September 04, 2017, 09:20:21 AM »
FYI the Raddus is 3km, not Home one sized, but yeah, this completely sucks
35
News & Updates / Re: Leading to Release, Official EaW Patch & Era 4 Breakdown
« on: September 04, 2017, 09:14:33 AM »
Very Nice. can't wait for the Release to come out. Keep up the good work!!
36
Star Wars Discussion / Re: Disney Star Wars cannon? Or EU (Legends)
« on: September 03, 2017, 09:58:20 PM »
IKR
so much for a "FRESH" start
so much for a "FRESH" start
37
Star Wars Discussion / Re: Disney Star Wars cannon? Or EU (Legends)
« on: September 03, 2017, 02:27:51 PM »
ugly, but if the Team can make a beautiful model for it as a small dreadnought unique to the EoTH then i would totally love to see it again. because a Dreadnought with EoTH principles is a better match for them then the Bellator in the PA, which DOESN'T truly match their doctrine. Talking about both platforms here. would rather see this as the unique Small Titan/ Hero only Dreadnought for the EoTH, and Give the PA the Assertor to match their slow, tough, defensive Fighter spam doctrine
but yeah, i see your point
but yeah, i see your point
38
Star Wars Discussion / Re: Disney Star Wars cannon? Or EU (Legends)
« on: September 03, 2017, 10:07:24 AM »
yeah there's that, and then the stupid Mandator 4 as well... "sigh" well, there went any hope the Eclipse would be it instead.
interesting though, aside from the class name, as a Headquarters/Mobile shipyard rather than straight warship for the Order is an interesting concept. something is likely to trace it back to Palpatine though, as How the *%#$ could the First order build THAT!! and theStarkiller Base Death Star 3.0!!!
at least a Viscount analogue is in in the form of the Raddus
interesting though, aside from the class name, as a Headquarters/Mobile shipyard rather than straight warship for the Order is an interesting concept. something is likely to trace it back to Palpatine though, as How the *%#$ could the First order build THAT!! and the
at least a Viscount analogue is in in the form of the Raddus
39
News & Updates / Re: Official EaW/FoC Patch
« on: September 01, 2017, 03:11:56 PM »
This is Disney we are talking about. They want everything to be THEIR Cannon
40
News & Updates / Re: Official EaW/FoC Patch
« on: September 01, 2017, 02:47:54 PM »
hooray! Finally! Are the planning to do a canon version of the game and fix some other issues?