Thrawn's Revenge

Imperial Civil War [Empire at War] => Discussion, Suggestions & Feedback => Topic started by: StarBornMichaelh165 on December 31, 2016, 03:51:10 PM

Title: The Assertor class SSD in 2.3 And other Unit idea's.
Post by: StarBornMichaelh165 on December 31, 2016, 03:51:10 PM
I hope this help in keeping you all form Tell this question to Corey and The Team this question OVER AND OVER again.
Title: Re: The Assertor class SSD in 2.3 And other Unit idea's.
Post by: StarBornMichaelh165 on December 31, 2016, 03:56:34 PM
Ok I fix it I'll come out with and actually Question for why the Assertor Class Star Dreadnaught should be in the next Version (or the one after 2.3 aka 2.4 of Thrawns Revenge)  of the mod or the one after that.
Title: Re: The Assertor class SSD in 2.3 And other Unit idea's.
Post by: Mr.Puerto on December 31, 2016, 08:21:57 PM
Hasn't Corey said multiple times he will not add the Assertor.
Title: Re: The Assertor class SSD in 2.3 And other Unit idea's.
Post by: tlmiller on December 31, 2016, 08:26:12 PM
where's the option:

"The Assertor wasn't very common, and is totally redundant, and thus completely not worth the mod team wasting their efforts on"?


(And this coming from someone who's second favorite Dreadnought after the Sovereign is the Assertor)
Title: Re: The Assertor class SSD in 2.3 And other Unit idea's.
Post by: StarBornMichaelh165 on December 31, 2016, 08:49:04 PM
where's the option:

"The Assertor wasn't very common, and is totally redundant, and thus completely not worth the mod team wasting their efforts on"?


(And this coming from someone who's second favorite Dreadnought after the Sovereign is the Assertor)
And now you can see why this is here so that people can talk about the Ship here instead of somewhere else. But I can see why that is the case in why they wouldn't put the ship in the mod (Until they need the Assertor for the mod) yeah again I can why.
Title: Re: The Assertor class SSD in 2.3 And other Unit idea's.
Post by: Helix345 on January 01, 2017, 03:48:03 PM
where is the option in the poll to never add the assertor class?
Title: Re: The Assertor class SSD in 2.3 And other Unit idea's.
Post by: StarBornMichaelh165 on January 01, 2017, 06:05:34 PM
where is the option in the poll to never add the assertor class?
none HAHAHA but try looking it up man.
Title: Re: The Assertor class SSD in 2.3 And other Unit idea's.
Post by: Helix345 on January 01, 2017, 10:40:05 PM
none HAHAHA but try looking it up man.
Looking up the assertor class, or the option to say we don't want another ssd? Because if I were to make a new poll with that, option corey would probably delete it due to how redundant it is.
Title: Re: The Assertor class SSD in 2.3 And other Unit idea's.
Post by: StarBornMichaelh165 on January 02, 2017, 10:12:30 AM
Looking up the assertor class, or the option to say we don't want another ssd? Because if I were to make a new poll with that, option corey would probably delete it due to how redundant it is.
well ok then.
Title: Re: The Assertor class SSD in 2.3 And other Unit idea's.
Post by: DarthRevansRevenge on January 07, 2017, 04:59:44 PM
now that ive seen the Bellator for maldrood, we need more small SSDs for this game, instead of/in addition to the Five/(four?) monster SSDs
Title: Re: The Assertor class SSD in 2.3 And other Unit idea's.
Post by: tlmiller on January 07, 2017, 05:23:33 PM
Assertor isn't a small SSD.  Assertor is the same length as the Sovereign, at 15 KM.  Mandator 1 & 2 would be the only other "small" Star Dreadnoughts, being 8 KM each, with even the III being 12 KM.
Title: Re: The Assertor class SSD in 2.3 And other Unit idea's.
Post by: Mr.Puerto on January 07, 2017, 05:25:27 PM
now that ive seen the Bellator for maldrood, we need more small SSDs for this game, instead of/in addition to the Five/(four?) monster SSDs
you mean like pocket SSDs like the Allegiance  and the Praetor II. Or something on a bigger scale?
Title: Re: The Assertor class SSD in 2.3 And other Unit idea's.
Post by: DarthRevansRevenge on January 07, 2017, 06:18:49 PM
no, not battlecruisers(like allegiance or preator), but like assertor and Mandator class SSDs. there are WAY too many executors running around, we need more smaller stuff
Title: Re: The Assertor class SSD in 2.3 And other Unit idea's.
Post by: Helix345 on January 07, 2017, 08:27:13 PM
I really don't think we need more ssds.
Title: Re: The Assertor class SSD in 2.3 And other Unit idea's.
Post by: tlmiller on January 07, 2017, 08:36:08 PM
I really don't think we need more ssds.

+1.  We have enough, doubly now that with the Bellator, there's 5 different types of SSD in the mod.
Title: Re: The Assertor class SSD in 2.3 And other Unit idea's.
Post by: Mr.Puerto on January 07, 2017, 09:08:42 PM
no, not battlecruisers(like allegiance or preator), but like assertor and Mandator class SSDs. there are WAY too many executors running around, we need more smaller stuff
Mandator's would probably be gone by this point and doesn't have any cannon design (I think).  I rather have them make more amazing GCs than code one or two SSDs . As for the Assertor Corey has already put the solid no on that ship. 5 SSDs are already enough. So I am on that side. I enjoy using SSDs but when they just take over the game play and mod, it becomes annoying.