Posted by: Corey
« on: January 25, 2017, 04:21:01 PM »Quote
My friend and I tried Multi but couldn't progress in eras.
That's one of the many things that multiplayer won't let you do.
That's one of the many things that multiplayer won't let you do.
Posted by: Shadowfita
« on: January 25, 2017, 06:48:30 AM »The things that can be done in Empire at War multiplayer are significantly more limited than singleplayer, so it was never a heavy focus. The Thrawn GC that exists in multiplayer was made almost a decade ago. From what I remember, for balance reasons we picked a handful of similar heroes for each side, and used them.
I see, that's a shame. My friend and I tried Multi but couldn't progress in eras. Ah well. Great mod, thanks for the response.
Posted by: Corey
« on: January 24, 2017, 04:02:35 AM »The things that can be done in Empire at War multiplayer are significantly more limited than singleplayer, so it was never a heavy focus. The Thrawn GC that exists in multiplayer was made almost a decade ago. From what I remember, for balance reasons we picked a handful of similar heroes for each side, and used them.
Posted by: Shadowfita
« on: January 24, 2017, 03:57:01 AM »Were you playing Ascendancy (for Sins) or Imperial Civil War (for Empire at War)?
My friend and I have the same issue. Would love to know if that's a feature or a bug.
Never mind we may be stupid.
Posted by: Sigwald477
« on: December 01, 2016, 01:34:45 PM »Imperial Civil War, my apologies
Posted by: Corey
« on: December 01, 2016, 12:29:08 PM »Were you playing Ascendancy (for Sins) or Imperial Civil War (for Empire at War)?
Posted by: Sigwald477
« on: December 01, 2016, 12:06:12 PM »Good afternoon, my friend and I were playing multiplayer through game ranger, and the campaigns we had, had barely any (if any at all) of the heroes, is that intentional? or did we mess up our installation?